Skip to content

Conversation

wjur
Copy link
Contributor

@wjur wjur commented Feb 18, 2016

The PR changes outdated scaladocs for Gini and Entropy classes. Since PR #886 Spark supports multiclass classification, but the docs tell only about binary classification.

@wjur wjur changed the title [Docs] Fix Gini and Entropy scaladocs in context of multiclass classification WIP [Docs] Fix Gini and Entropy scaladocs in context of multiclass classification Feb 18, 2016
@wjur wjur force-pushed the wjur/docs_multiclass branch from 51e940c to d08cfc7 Compare February 18, 2016 12:54
@wjur wjur changed the title WIP [Docs] Fix Gini and Entropy scaladocs in context of multiclass classification [Docs] Fix Gini and Entropy scaladocs in context of multiclass classification Feb 18, 2016
@jkbradley
Copy link
Member

ok to test

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Jun 15, 2016

I'm going to merge this in master/2.0.

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Jun 15, 2016

Thanks.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 6e0b3d7 Jun 15, 2016
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2016
…fication

The PR changes outdated scaladocs for Gini and Entropy classes. Since PR #886 Spark supports multiclass classification, but the docs tell only about binary classification.

Author: Wojciech Jurczyk <[email protected]>

Closes #11252 from wjur/wjur/docs_multiclass.

(cherry picked from commit 6e0b3d7)
Signed-off-by: Reynold Xin <[email protected]>
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jun 15, 2016

Test build #60613 has finished for PR 11252 at commit d08cfc7.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants