Skip to content

Conversation

@uncleGen
Copy link
Contributor

@uncleGen uncleGen commented Mar 9, 2017

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

A follow up to SPARK-19859:

  • extract the calculation of delayMs and reuse it.
  • update EventTimeWatermarkExec
  • use the correct delayMs in EventTimeWatermark

How was this patch tested?

Jenkins.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 9, 2017

Test build #74233 has finished for PR 17221 at commit 2c2c806.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@uncleGen
Copy link
Contributor Author

uncleGen commented Mar 9, 2017

cc @zsxwing

@zsxwing
Copy link
Member

zsxwing commented Mar 9, 2017

Thanks! LGTM. Merging to master and 2.1.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in eeb1d6d Mar 9, 2017
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2017
…d one.

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

A follow up to SPARK-19859:

- extract the calculation of `delayMs` and reuse it.
- update EventTimeWatermarkExec
- use the correct `delayMs` in EventTimeWatermark

## How was this patch tested?

Jenkins.

Author: uncleGen <[email protected]>

Closes #17221 from uncleGen/SPARK-19859.

(cherry picked from commit eeb1d6d)
Signed-off-by: Shixiong Zhu <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants