Skip to content

Conversation

@hhbyyh
Copy link
Contributor

@hhbyyh hhbyyh commented May 9, 2017

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20670
As suggested by Sean Owen in #17130, the transform code in FPGrowthModel can be simplified.

As I tested on some public dataset http://fimi.ua.ac.be/data/, the performance of the new transform code is even or better than the old implementation.

How was this patch tested?

Existing unit test.

@hhbyyh
Copy link
Contributor Author

hhbyyh commented May 9, 2017

cc @srowen @jkbradley @felixcheung Thanks.

Copy link
Member

@felixcheung felixcheung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - yap we reviewed this

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented May 9, 2017

Test build #76635 has finished for PR 17912 at commit b9e3e47.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@felixcheung
Copy link
Member

merged to master

@asfgit asfgit closed this in a819dab May 10, 2017
liyichao pushed a commit to liyichao/spark that referenced this pull request May 24, 2017
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20670
As suggested by Sean Owen in apache#17130, the transform code in FPGrowthModel can be simplified.

As I tested on some public dataset http://fimi.ua.ac.be/data/, the performance of the new transform code is even or better than the old implementation.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing unit test.

Author: Yuhao Yang <[email protected]>

Closes apache#17912 from hhbyyh/fpgrowthTransform.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants