[SPARK-20792][SS] Support same timeout operations in mapGroupsWithState function in batch queries as in streaming queries #18024
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
jenkins test this please |
|
Test build #77047 has finished for PR 18024 at commit
|
|
LGTM. Merging to master and 2.2. |
asfgit
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2017
…te function in batch queries as in streaming queries ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? Currently, in the batch queries, timeout is disabled (i.e. GroupStateTimeout.NoTimeout) which means any GroupState.setTimeout*** operation would throw UnsupportedOperationException. This makes it weird when converting a streaming query into a batch query by changing the input DF from streaming to a batch DF. If the timeout was enabled and used, then the batch query will start throwing UnsupportedOperationException. This PR creates the dummy state in batch queries with the provided timeoutConf so that it behaves in the same way. The code has been refactored to make it obvious when the state is being created for a batch query or a streaming query. ## How was this patch tested? Additional tests Author: Tathagata Das <[email protected]> Closes #18024 from tdas/SPARK-20792. (cherry picked from commit 9d6661c) Signed-off-by: Shixiong Zhu <[email protected]>
liyichao
pushed a commit
to liyichao/spark
that referenced
this pull request
May 24, 2017
…te function in batch queries as in streaming queries ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? Currently, in the batch queries, timeout is disabled (i.e. GroupStateTimeout.NoTimeout) which means any GroupState.setTimeout*** operation would throw UnsupportedOperationException. This makes it weird when converting a streaming query into a batch query by changing the input DF from streaming to a batch DF. If the timeout was enabled and used, then the batch query will start throwing UnsupportedOperationException. This PR creates the dummy state in batch queries with the provided timeoutConf so that it behaves in the same way. The code has been refactored to make it obvious when the state is being created for a batch query or a streaming query. ## How was this patch tested? Additional tests Author: Tathagata Das <[email protected]> Closes apache#18024 from tdas/SPARK-20792.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, in the batch queries, timeout is disabled (i.e. GroupStateTimeout.NoTimeout) which means any GroupState.setTimeout*** operation would throw UnsupportedOperationException. This makes it weird when converting a streaming query into a batch query by changing the input DF from streaming to a batch DF. If the timeout was enabled and used, then the batch query will start throwing UnsupportedOperationException.
This PR creates the dummy state in batch queries with the provided timeoutConf so that it behaves in the same way. The code has been refactored to make it obvious when the state is being created for a batch query or a streaming query.
How was this patch tested?
Additional tests