-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.9k
[SPARK-21413][SQL] Fix 64KB JVM bytecode limit problem in multiple projections with CASE WHEN #18641
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
[SPARK-21413][SQL] Fix 64KB JVM bytecode limit problem in multiple projections with CASE WHEN #18641
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a26aafe
initial commit
kiszk 6f0de18
remove end-to-end test since sbt test does not go to fallback path in…
kiszk 7c78cf2
Changed a decision logic to split it into methods
kiszk 2e01427
address review comment
kiszk fb62f3c
fix comments
kiszk 85bee25
fix failure of HiveCompatibilitySuite.ppr_allchildsarenull
kiszk 3cb95aa
address review comment
kiszk ca0ddd5
use return value of addNewFunction for caller function name
kiszk 9080500
rebase with master
kiszk b6030d9
address review comment
kiszk e69f126
fix failures for ImputerSuite
kiszk 5466ef0
fix failures for ImputerSuite
kiszk File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we follow what we did for
AndandOr, and just check the code length at the beginning? TBH I don't understand your change after several minutes reading.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For
CaseWhen, the code bloat occurs in one case class. TheCaseWhenCodegen.doGenCodecan generate deeply-nestedif-then-elsestatements as above in the comment. Each element incaseshas only aif-then. Thus, it is not possible to insert code check here. SinceAndandOrgenerates deeply nestedif-then-elseby callingdoGenCodemany times, to check code size here works well.This line generates the nested
if-then-else. Thus, after this line, code size check is performed.What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We only codegen CASE WHEN if the case branches are less than 20, I think check code size here is good enough.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see. Do you want to add such a code?