-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.9k
[SPARK-21751][SQL] CodeGeneraor.splitExpressions counts code size more precisely #18966
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4ac090a
initial commit
kiszk d96f8e5
make threshold configurable
kiszk 87578db
use lines per method as split threshold instead of chars per method
kiszk 073e9e5
update benchmark results
kiszk 63377a6
make a new option effective at runtime
kiszk a489938
rebase with master
kiszk b04c09c
avoid to use SparkEnv.get
kiszk 4c47802
use the original threshold against Java code excluding comments
kiszk 516a72a
revert test case
kiszk File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -772,16 +772,19 @@ class CodegenContext { | |
| foldFunctions: Seq[String] => String = _.mkString("", ";\n", ";")): String = { | ||
| val blocks = new ArrayBuffer[String]() | ||
| val blockBuilder = new StringBuilder() | ||
| var length = 0 | ||
| for (code <- expressions) { | ||
| // We can't know how many bytecode will be generated, so use the length of source code | ||
| // as metric. A method should not go beyond 8K, otherwise it will not be JITted, should | ||
| // also not be too small, or it will have many function calls (for wide table), see the | ||
| // results in BenchmarkWideTable. | ||
| if (blockBuilder.length > 1024) { | ||
| if (length > 1024) { | ||
|
||
| blocks += blockBuilder.toString() | ||
| blockBuilder.clear() | ||
| length = 0 | ||
| } | ||
| blockBuilder.append(code) | ||
| length += CodeFormatter.stripExtraNewLinesAndComments(code).length | ||
| } | ||
| blocks += blockBuilder.toString() | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you also add back the test case of this function?