Skip to content

Conversation

@JkSelf
Copy link
Contributor

@JkSelf JkSelf commented Dec 14, 2018

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

revert spark 21052 in spark 2.4 because of the discussion in PR23269

How was this patch tested?

N/A

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

ok to test

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

Can you fix the PR title to [SPARK-26316][BRANCH-2.4] Revert hash join metrics in spark 21052 that causes performance degradation?

@JkSelf JkSelf changed the title revert spark 21052 in spark 2.4 because of the performance degradation [S[SPARK-26316][BRANCH-2.4] Revert hash join metrics in spark 21052 that causes performance degradation Dec 14, 2018
@JkSelf JkSelf changed the title [S[SPARK-26316][BRANCH-2.4] Revert hash join metrics in spark 21052 that causes performance degradation [SPARK-26316][BRANCH-2.4] Revert hash join metrics in spark 21052 that causes performance degradation Dec 14, 2018
@JkSelf
Copy link
Contributor Author

JkSelf commented Dec 14, 2018

@HyukjinKwon ok. Fixed.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 14, 2018

Test build #100128 has finished for PR 23318 at commit ca4ae0e.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 14, 2018

Test build #100134 has finished for PR 23318 at commit 45e16a9.

  • This patch fails due to an unknown error code, -9.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

Retest this please.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 15, 2018

Test build #100166 has finished for PR 23318 at commit 45e16a9.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

cc @viirya

Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, LGTM. Merged to branch-2.4.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2018
…at causes performance degradation

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
revert spark 21052 in spark 2.4 because of the discussion in [PR23269](#23269)

## How was this patch tested?
N/A

Closes #23318 from JkSelf/branch-2.4-revert21052.

Authored-by: jiake <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

Thank you, @JkSelf .

@viirya
Copy link
Member

viirya commented Dec 17, 2018

Late LGTM. Thanks @dongjoon-hyun for pinging me.

@JkSelf As this was merged, you can close it now.

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

Thank you, @viirya .

BTW, I forgot to close this. After Gitbox transition, the committers are able to close.

kai-chi pushed a commit to kai-chi/spark that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2019
…at causes performance degradation

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
revert spark 21052 in spark 2.4 because of the discussion in [PR23269](apache#23269)

## How was this patch tested?
N/A

Closes apache#23318 from JkSelf/branch-2.4-revert21052.

Authored-by: jiake <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
kai-chi pushed a commit to kai-chi/spark that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2019
…at causes performance degradation

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
revert spark 21052 in spark 2.4 because of the discussion in [PR23269](apache#23269)

## How was this patch tested?
N/A

Closes apache#23318 from JkSelf/branch-2.4-revert21052.

Authored-by: jiake <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants