-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.9k
SPARK-4338. [YARN] Ditch yarn-alpha. #3215
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
52a4a75
to
b0bbb13
Compare
Test build #23234 has started for PR 3215 at commit
|
Test build #23234 has finished for PR 3215 at commit
|
Test FAILed. |
Test build #23242 has started for PR 3215 at commit
|
Test build #23242 has finished for PR 3215 at commit
|
Test PASSed. |
Yes, if it's targeted for 1.3, it would be nice to get this in not long after 1.2. |
I have a whole set of simplifying changes that I want to go in (e.g. YARN-1714), but thought it would probably be good to break things up a bit for easier review. |
+1; cleanups can come later. |
f8c90f3
to
8427a9b
Compare
Test build #23279 has started for PR 3215 at commit
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is \n still needed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oops sorry missed that one
If we don't pull this in right away (wait til closer to 1.2 release) is it going to delay your other prs? It would be nice to hold off a bit to pull this in if not. I took a quick look at the pr, we need to update docs/building-spark.md. I still need to download this and try it out. |
+1. I imagine this opens up a world of opportunities to cleanup, which can come later in separate PRs. In particular we relied on a lot of abstractions that were necessary to avoid duplicate code, but these are no longer needed and it would simplify the code significantly if we get rid of them. |
Test build #23279 has finished for PR 3215 at commit
|
Test PASSed. |
Test build #23290 has started for PR 3215 at commit
|
66e731f
to
ec3d8da
Compare
@tgravescs it would delay other PRs, but not a huge deal if you think it's too soon. |
Test build #23293 has started for PR 3215 at commit
|
Test build #23290 has finished for PR 3215 at commit
|
Test PASSed. |
Test build #23293 has finished for PR 3215 at commit
|
Test PASSed. |
docs/building-spark.md
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know you didn't change this here (so we can file separate jira for it if you want) but perhaps we should add example and some text here about hadoop 2.5 and >. Since there is no hadoop profile 2.5 and the user should use the 2.4 profile.
was the yarn/stable directory removed with this? I couldn't tell from applying the patch and not sure how directory removals show up here. |
ec3d8da
to
8fbf896
Compare
Test build #23469 has started for PR 3215 at commit
|
Successfully ran spark-shell in yarn-client mode and an app in yarn-cluster mode. |
LGTM - can't wait for this to merge in. |
8fbf896
to
7175ae8
Compare
Test build #23774 has started for PR 3215 at commit
|
Test build #23774 has finished for PR 3215 at commit
|
Test PASSed. |
7175ae8
to
3128915
Compare
Test build #24069 has started for PR 3215 at commit
|
Test build #24069 has finished for PR 3215 at commit
|
Test PASSed. |
72b63a9
to
3d244f2
Compare
3d244f2
to
1c5ac08
Compare
@tgravescs @andrewor14 do you feel comfortable merging this now that 1.2 is almost out the door? |
Test build #24180 has started for PR 3215 at commit
|
Test FAILed. |
Test build #24180 has finished for PR 3215 at commit
|
Test PASSed. |
seems like we are pretty close on the rc. I'm good with merging this. @andrewor14 any objections at this point? |
We actually don't need to wait on the RC to merge this since this is only going into master. I'll take a quick look and will likely merge it after that since this is pretty straightforward. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do you need to do .stripMargins
here?
Hey this LGTM. I'm just gonna merge this. My comments are minor enough that we can slip them in later. |
Woot! I'll make that fix as part of SPARK-4447. |
Sorry if this is a little premature with 1.2 still not out the door, but it will make other work like SPARK-4136 and SPARK-2089 a lot easier.