Skip to content

Conversation

sryza
Copy link
Contributor

@sryza sryza commented Nov 12, 2014

Sorry if this is a little premature with 1.2 still not out the door, but it will make other work like SPARK-4136 and SPARK-2089 a lot easier.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 12, 2014

Test build #23234 has started for PR 3215 at commit b0bbb13.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 12, 2014

Test build #23234 has finished for PR 3215 at commit b0bbb13.

  • This patch fails Scala style tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23234/
Test FAILed.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 12, 2014

Test build #23242 has started for PR 3215 at commit f8c90f3.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 12, 2014

Test build #23242 has finished for PR 3215 at commit f8c90f3.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23242/
Test PASSed.

@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Nov 12, 2014

Yes, if it's targeted for 1.3, it would be nice to get this in not long after 1.2.
I think there's more that simplifies, like some reflection-related code to bridge the gap between the two versions. That's worth a review.

@sryza
Copy link
Contributor Author

sryza commented Nov 12, 2014

I have a whole set of simplifying changes that I want to go in (e.g. YARN-1714), but thought it would probably be good to break things up a bit for easier review.

@vanzin
Copy link
Contributor

vanzin commented Nov 12, 2014

+1; cleanups can come later.

@sryza
Copy link
Contributor Author

sryza commented Nov 12, 2014

@tgravescs

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 12, 2014

Test build #23279 has started for PR 3215 at commit 8427a9b.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is \n still needed?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops sorry missed that one

@tgravescs
Copy link
Contributor

If we don't pull this in right away (wait til closer to 1.2 release) is it going to delay your other prs? It would be nice to hold off a bit to pull this in if not.

I took a quick look at the pr, we need to update docs/building-spark.md. I still need to download this and try it out.

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

+1. I imagine this opens up a world of opportunities to cleanup, which can come later in separate PRs. In particular we relied on a lot of abstractions that were necessary to avoid duplicate code, but these are no longer needed and it would simplify the code significantly if we get rid of them.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 12, 2014

Test build #23279 has finished for PR 3215 at commit 8427a9b.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23279/
Test PASSed.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 13, 2014

Test build #23290 has started for PR 3215 at commit 66e731f.

  • This patch does not merge cleanly.

@sryza
Copy link
Contributor Author

sryza commented Nov 13, 2014

@tgravescs it would delay other PRs, but not a huge deal if you think it's too soon.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 13, 2014

Test build #23293 has started for PR 3215 at commit ec3d8da.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 13, 2014

Test build #23290 has finished for PR 3215 at commit 66e731f.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch does not merge cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23290/
Test PASSed.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 13, 2014

Test build #23293 has finished for PR 3215 at commit ec3d8da.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23293/
Test PASSed.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I know you didn't change this here (so we can file separate jira for it if you want) but perhaps we should add example and some text here about hadoop 2.5 and >. Since there is no hadoop profile 2.5 and the user should use the 2.4 profile.

@tgravescs
Copy link
Contributor

was the yarn/stable directory removed with this? I couldn't tell from applying the patch and not sure how directory removals show up here.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 17, 2014

Test build #23469 has started for PR 3215 at commit 8fbf896.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@sryza
Copy link
Contributor Author

sryza commented Nov 17, 2014

Successfully ran spark-shell in yarn-client mode and an app in yarn-cluster mode.

@ksakellis
Copy link

LGTM - can't wait for this to merge in.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 24, 2014

Test build #23774 has started for PR 3215 at commit 7175ae8.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 24, 2014

Test build #23774 has finished for PR 3215 at commit 7175ae8.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23774/
Test PASSed.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 3, 2014

Test build #24069 has started for PR 3215 at commit 3128915.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 3, 2014

Test build #24069 has finished for PR 3215 at commit 3128915.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24069/
Test PASSed.

@sryza sryza force-pushed the sandy-spark-4338 branch 2 times, most recently from 72b63a9 to 3d244f2 Compare December 5, 2014 09:41
@sryza
Copy link
Contributor Author

sryza commented Dec 5, 2014

@tgravescs @andrewor14 do you feel comfortable merging this now that 1.2 is almost out the door?

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 5, 2014

Test build #24180 has started for PR 3215 at commit 1c5ac08.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24179/
Test FAILed.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 5, 2014

Test build #24180 has finished for PR 3215 at commit 1c5ac08.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24180/
Test PASSed.

@sryza sryza changed the title SPARK-4338. Ditch yarn-alpha. SPARK-4338. [YARN] Ditch yarn-alpha. Dec 5, 2014
@tgravescs
Copy link
Contributor

seems like we are pretty close on the rc. I'm good with merging this. @andrewor14 any objections at this point?

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

We actually don't need to wait on the RC to merge this since this is only going into master. I'll take a quick look and will likely merge it after that since this is pretty straightforward.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do you need to do .stripMargins here?

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

Hey this LGTM. I'm just gonna merge this. My comments are minor enough that we can slip them in later.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 912563a Dec 9, 2014
@sryza
Copy link
Contributor Author

sryza commented Dec 9, 2014

Woot! I'll make that fix as part of SPARK-4447.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants