Skip to content

Conversation

@aarondav
Copy link
Contributor

@aarondav aarondav commented Dec 4, 2014

Just found this instance while doing some jstack-based profiling of a Spark SQL job. It is very unlikely that this is causing much of a perf issue anywhere, but it is unnecessarily suboptimal.

Just found this instance while doing some jstack-based profiling of a Spark SQL job. It is very unlikely that this is causing much of a perf regression anywhere, but it is unnecessarily suboptimal.
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 4, 2014

Test build #24119 has started for PR 3593 at commit 962cdfc.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 4, 2014

Test build #24119 has finished for PR 3593 at commit 962cdfc.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24119/
Test PASSed.

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Dec 4, 2014

LGTM. Merging in master & branch-1.2.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2014
Just found this instance while doing some jstack-based profiling of a Spark SQL job. It is very unlikely that this is causing much of a perf issue anywhere, but it is unnecessarily suboptimal.

Author: Aaron Davidson <[email protected]>

Closes #3593 from aarondav/seq-opt and squashes the following commits:

962cdfc [Aaron Davidson] [SQL] Minor: Avoid calling Seq#size in a loop

(cherry picked from commit c6c7165)
Signed-off-by: Reynold Xin <[email protected]>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in c6c7165 Dec 4, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants