Skip to content

Config updates for the new shuffle transport. #3657

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Config updates for the new shuffle transport. #3657

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rxin
Copy link
Contributor

@rxin rxin commented Dec 10, 2014

No description provided.

@aarondav
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 10, 2014

Test build #24281 has started for PR 3657 at commit 7370eab.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 10, 2014

Test build #24281 has finished for PR 3657 at commit 7370eab.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24281/
Test PASSed.

@aarondav
Copy link
Contributor

Merging this into master and branch-1.2.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2014
@rxin @aarondav
Config updates for the new shuffle transport.
5e5d8f4 
Author: Reynold Xin <[email protected]>

Closes #3657 from rxin/conf-update and squashes the following commits:

7370eab [Reynold Xin] Config updates for the new shuffle transport.

(cherry picked from commit 9bd9334)
Signed-off-by: Aaron Davidson <[email protected]>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 9bd9334 Dec 10, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@rxin @aarondav @SparkQA @AmplabJenkins