-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.9k
[SPARK-40229][PS][TEST][FOLLOWUP] Add openpyxl to requirements.txt
#38425
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
cc @itholic , @HyukjinKwon , @Yikun |
|
LGTM when the test pass. Thanks! |
|
Thank you, @itholic . |
Yikun
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, and this requirements.txt is just for dev install, we can safe to merge and don't need CI.
|
@dongjoon-hyun @itholic Thanks, merged to master. |
|
Thank you, @Yikun . |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thx!
|
Thank you, @HyukjinKwon . |
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This is a follow-up of apache#37671. ### Why are the changes needed? Since apache#37671 added `openpyxl` for PySpark test environments and re-enabled `test_to_excel` test, we need to add it to `requirements.txt` as PySpark test dependency explicitly. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. This is a test dependency. ### How was this patch tested? Manually. Closes apache#38425 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-40229. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <[email protected]>
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up of #37671.
Why are the changes needed?
Since #37671 added
openpyxlfor PySpark test environments and re-enabledtest_to_exceltest, we need to add it torequirements.txtas PySpark test dependency explicitly.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No. This is a test dependency.
How was this patch tested?
Manually.