Skip to content

Conversation

@WangTaoTheTonic
Copy link
Contributor

I found this by chance while building spark and think it is better to keep its name consistent with other sub-projects (Spark Project *).

I am not gonna file JIRA as it is a pretty small issue.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jun 3, 2015

Test build #34053 has finished for PR 6603 at commit 994b3ba.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@pwendell
Copy link
Contributor

pwendell commented Jun 3, 2015

Sure, sounds good.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in ccaa823 Jun 3, 2015
jeanlyn pushed a commit to jeanlyn/spark that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2015
I found this by chance while building spark and think it is better to keep its name consistent with other sub-projects (Spark Project *).

I am not gonna file JIRA as it is a pretty small issue.

Author: WangTaoTheTonic <[email protected]>

Closes apache#6603 from WangTaoTheTonic/projName and squashes the following commits:

994b3ba [WangTaoTheTonic] make the project name consistent
nemccarthy pushed a commit to nemccarthy/spark that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2015
I found this by chance while building spark and think it is better to keep its name consistent with other sub-projects (Spark Project *).

I am not gonna file JIRA as it is a pretty small issue.

Author: WangTaoTheTonic <[email protected]>

Closes apache#6603 from WangTaoTheTonic/projName and squashes the following commits:

994b3ba [WangTaoTheTonic] make the project name consistent
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants