Skip to content

Conversation

@driazati
Copy link
Member

@driazati driazati commented Feb 18, 2022

As discussed in https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-remove-codeowners/12095/2?u=driazati, this adds a mechanism to auto-tag people based on PR/issue titles and labels. This should improve visibility across the project and make it easy for interested people to subscribe to various topics.

Details on usage will be posted in the relevant issue: #10317

cc @areusch

As discussed in https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-remove-codeowners/12095/2?u=driazati, this adds a mechanism to auto-tag people based on PR/issue titles and labels. This should improve visibility across the project and make it easy for interested people to subscribe to various topics.

Details on usage will be posted in the relevant issue: #10317
@areusch areusch merged commit 70ad1d5 into apache:main Mar 3, 2022
ziqiangxu8457 pushed a commit to ziqiangxu8457/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2022
As discussed in https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-remove-codeowners/12095/2?u=driazati, this adds a mechanism to auto-tag people based on PR/issue titles and labels. This should improve visibility across the project and make it easy for interested people to subscribe to various topics.

Details on usage will be posted in the relevant issue: apache#10317

Co-authored-by: driazati <[email protected]>
pfk-beta pushed a commit to pfk-beta/tvm that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2022
As discussed in https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-remove-codeowners/12095/2?u=driazati, this adds a mechanism to auto-tag people based on PR/issue titles and labels. This should improve visibility across the project and make it easy for interested people to subscribe to various topics.

Details on usage will be posted in the relevant issue: apache#10317

Co-authored-by: driazati <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants