Skip to content

Conversation

@Lunderberg
Copy link
Contributor

@Lunderberg Lunderberg commented May 23, 2022

Follow-up from #10181 and #11399. Thank you to @rgommers for pointing out that the non-versioned link is stable and working. The use of the versioned link was only introduced to work around the breakage of the stable link, so this reverts to the pre-breakage behavior.

cc @Mousius @areusch @driazati

…rsphinx link

Follow-up from apache#10181 and
apache#11399.  Thank you to @rgommers for
[pointing out]
(apache#11399 (comment))
that the non-versioned link is stable and working.  The use of
the versioned link was only introduced to work around the breakage of
the stable link, so this reverts to the pre-breakage behavior.
@Lunderberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Low-priority, as the CI is currently working.

Copy link
Member

@driazati driazati left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for following up, lgtm

@areusch areusch merged commit 7bab8f7 into apache:main May 23, 2022
@Lunderberg Lunderberg deleted the scipy_intersphinx_unversioned branch May 23, 2022 19:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants