Skip to content

Conversation

@hamogu
Copy link
Member

@hamogu hamogu commented Jun 27, 2025

While the registry still lists the main original author as maintainer, he has left astronomy several years ago and I agreed to take over, though I have never done anything to get saba back to a functioning state or maintain it in any way.

As it stands, saba is old, unmaintained and doesn’t actually work for anything newer than astropy 1.0 or so (because astropy.modelling has been changing so much).
I think there are better alternatives to get more fitting algorithms into astropy by now (e.g. optimagic ) and realistically, I’m not going to pick up saba again - I’d rather spend energy to keep Sherpa itself running or bridge astropy.modelling to optimagic. I suggest we archive saba and remove it from the affiliated package list. It never gained much traction so the risk that people need it to be listed there for help with their pre-astropy 2.0 fitting is vanishingly low.

I request this removal as current acting maintainer of saba and I have received confirmation from the other original author who is still active in the Astropy project (@taldcroft) that he agrees.

While the registry still lists the main original author as maintainer, he has left astronomy several years ago and I agreed to take over, though I have never done anything to get saba back to a functioning state or maintain it in any way.

As it stands, saba is old, unmaintained and doesn’t actually work for anything newer than astropy 1.0 or so (because astropy.modelling has been changing so much).
I think there are better alternatives to get more fitting algorithms into astropy by now (e.g. optimagic ) and realistically, I’m not going to pick up saba again - I’d rather spend energy to keep Sherpa itself running or bridge astropy.modelling to optimagic. I suggest we archive saba and remove it from the affiliated package list. It never gained much traction so the risk that people need it to be listed there for help with their pre-astropy 2.0 fitting is vanishingly low.

I request this removal as current acting maintainer of saba and I have received confirmation from the other original author who is still active in the Astropy project (@taldcroft) that he agrees.
Copy link
Contributor

@dhomeier dhomeier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed. I’d consider not being able to work with Astropy > 1.x as setting devstatus to red – no longer fully functional.

Copy link
Member

@pllim pllim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@pllim pllim merged commit efb7a64 into astropy:main Jun 27, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants