New bots, parsers and outputs

[helderfernandes1279]

No description provided.

[SYNchroACK]

@helderfernandes1279 , Is it possible for you to make different pull requests for the different features:

Pull request 1 (TCP Collector):
intelmq/bots/collectors/tcp/__init__.py
intelmq/bots/collectors/tcp/collector.py

Note: this bot is bot named 'intelmqlistner' that you commit in this pull req

Pull request 2 (UDP Collector):
intelmq/bots/collectors/udp/__init__.py
intelmq/bots/collectors/udp/collector.py

Note: this bot is bot named 'syslog' that you commit in this pull req

Pull request 3 (XMPP Collector):
intelmq/bots/collectors/xmpp/__init__.py
intelmq/bots/collectors/xmpp/collector.py

Pull request 4 (TCP Output):
intelmq/bots/outputs/tcp/__init__.py
intelmq/bots/outputs/tcp/output.py

Note: this bot is bot named 'IntelMQAgent' that you commit in this pull req

We rest of the commits we can discuss after we handle all the pull request mentioned before. Its a lot of work for eeryone to test and check your awesome work! ;D

Thank you @helderfernandes1279

[robcza]

@helderfernandes1279 will this eventually be fixed for the recent state of IntelMQ? Missing the Shadowserver parsers a lot

[sebix]

@robcza You can cherry-pick cc446fc into a branch of your fork, rebase on master, add tests :), and create a PR.

[robcza]

@sebix just making sure whether there is anything going on or not :) Direct cherry-picking seems to be a problem as I'm not able to find the source repo/branch. I can do it manually however it does not feel appropriate

[sebix]

@robcza We don't have feedback since half a year, so I think it's ok. Already did it the same with some other PRs.

git remote add helderfernandes1279 [email protected]:helderfernandes1279/intelmq.git
git remote update
git checkout -b shadowserver
git cherry-pick cc446fc

And follow the instructions, they are basically the same as for rebasing.

[helderfernandes1279]

I didn't check this latest version yet, but I think that I wil check that as soon as possible.......

[robcza]

@sebix can not deal with fatal: bad revision 'cc446fc' while cherry-picking
I believe, it is a problem with cherry-picking a commit from pull request, which is described in here: https://it-offshore.co.uk/code/47-git-cherry-pick-pull-request-fatal-bad-revision However, proposed solution doe not work for me either :) Any idea?

[sebix]

Please show your remotes:

git remote -v

Btw: git remote update fetches all sources from all remote repositories

[robcza]

git remote -v
helderfernandes1279 https://github.com/helderfernandes1279/intelmq.git (fetch)
helderfernandes1279 https://github.com/helderfernandes1279/intelmq.git (push)
origin  https://github.com/robcza/intelmq.git (fetch)
origin  https://github.com/robcza/intelmq.git (push)
upstream    https://github.com/certtools/intelmq.git (fetch)
upstream    https://github.com/certtools/intelmq.git (push)

[sebix]

I'm working on some shadowserver parsers in my feature branch, I used the existing ones in v0.9 branch as base, using:

git checkout v0.9 intelmq/bots/parsers/shadowserver

That pulls in the given files into the current branch.

https://github.com/sebix/intelmq/tree/bugfixes

[sebix]

• XMPP collector: we have one
• shadowserver parser: in master too
• Syslog collector, we want this, but we can postpone it to 1.1 0666a81
• Intelmq collector: basically a tcp collector, opening a local port, can be postponed to 1.1 d64673f
• intelmq output, basically the tcp output, but sending b64-encoded data, not json
• phishtank parser fixes: in master too

[SYNchroACK]

I talked with @helderfernandes1279 and we decided that is ok to close this pull request. However, I created two new issues ( #848 and #849 ) tagged as 'feature request' for v1.1 milestone.