Skip to content

Conversation

dmth
Copy link
Contributor

@dmth dmth commented Sep 12, 2016

We enhanced the Filterexpert in order to be capable of using regular expressions.

If a value is set in filter_regex, the field filter_value is interpreted as RegEx. The expert will always use pythons re.search to filter the values.

If no value is set in filter_regex, the common behavior == is used.

This change should not be incompatible with existing configurations.

@dmth dmth mentioned this pull request Sep 12, 2016
18 tasks
@sebix sebix added feature Indicates new feature requests or new features component: bots needs: review labels Sep 12, 2016
"time.source": "2005-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"time.observation": "2015-09-12T00:00:00+00:00",
"feed.name": "test-feed",
"raw": "fds56gf4jh4jhgh4j6"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is an invalid base64-value and will fail once #669 is merged.

@sebix sebix modified the milestone: Release v1.0 Sep 13, 2016
@sebix sebix merged commit f5bf3fb into certtools:master Sep 14, 2016
sebix added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2016
ENH: Filterexpert can now use RegEx

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Wagner <[email protected]>
@dmth dmth deleted the dev-filterexpert branch January 20, 2017 14:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

component: bots feature Indicates new feature requests or new features

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants