-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 183
[MRG] Regression on pickling classes from the __main__ module #132
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d3c1f46
New tests for interactively defined functions
ogrisel 8d7c003
More robust non-regression test
ogrisel 5d2ae3e
Use __file__ as reference instead of os.getcwd()
ogrisel 9443907
Nicer indentation handling for inline code snippet
ogrisel b7014de
cleanup
ogrisel 99bfb95
More comprehensive interactive function tests
ogrisel acf5edd
Fix interactive function pickling
ogrisel 7da07a3
Simpler fix
ogrisel d9e02fb
Further simplification of save_global
ogrisel 20feec2
Add entry to CHANGES.md
ogrisel 748e7d2
Revert "Further simplification of save_global"
ogrisel File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this mean
save_dynamic_classis also used for functions? If so, could you rename that method and update its docstring?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think functions get dispatched here. The dispatch entries for
save_globalare:whereas function-likes are dispatched via:
I believe the name
save_globalis a holdover from the basePicklerclass, which callsself.save_globalin some base class methods that we call into viasuper, so renaming this isn't straightforward.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have pushed a new commit to simplify that function even further and all tests still pass. However, I am not sure we are not breaking edge cases in third party libraries and applications.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have run the test suite of both loky and joblib against this branch all tests pass as well so I am pretty confident that the changes are fine.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you check whether
save_dynamic_classreally gets a function as input and, if so, change the name or docstring?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@pitrou I'm pretty confident
save_dynamic_classcan never be called with a function as input. It accessesobj.__bases__unconditionally, which doesn't exist on function objects.