Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions eng/pipelines/libraries/outerloop-mono.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ schedules:
branches:
include:
- main
always: false # run only if there were changes since the last successful scheduled run.

variables:
- template: variables.yml
Expand Down
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion eng/pipelines/libraries/outerloop.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,7 +6,8 @@ schedules:
branches:
include:
- main
- release/*.*
- release/*.0
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The -staging variants might be more useful as they get active changes. Granted - neither release branch gets a lot of scrutiny.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah I don't have a strong opinion. My thinking was that since they don't get a lot of scrutiny anyway (they've been red forever) it'd be better to save more reasources by only running on the .0 branches which change less often.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I assume the always change is really the more important of the two here.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we ever decide to once again release a version like 3.1, this filter won't apply. Shouldn't it just be release/*?

Copy link
Member Author

@akoeplinger akoeplinger Apr 24, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@carlossanlop no since that one will match the preview/staging branches again. if we ever go back to .1 then lots of other stuff will break, this is the least of my concerns :)

always: false # run only if there were changes since the last successful scheduled run.

variables:
- template: variables.yml
Expand Down
Loading