Use Reference items instead of P2Ps for inbox libs #64508
Conversation
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-infrastructure-libraries Issue DetailsSome libraries still had ProjectReferences to libraries which refs
|
Some libraries still had ProjectReferences to libraries which refs were added to the targeting pack with the last release. Therefore these references can just be normal "Reference" items instead of P2Ps.
ViktorHofer
force-pushed
the
UseReferencesInsteadOfP2Ps
branch
from
f08df56 to
6e03bdf
Compare
ericstj
left a comment
ericstj
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. I wonder if we can catch this with a validation target so that folks don't introduce more?
Such validation (either via a target or even without one) could be easily implemented. Ideally we would go the opposite way and use P2Ps everywhere which is why I'm a bit torn. |
ghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
2 participants
Some libraries still had ProjectReferences to libraries which refs
were added to the targeting pack with the last release. Therefore these
references can just be normal "Reference" items instead of P2Ps.