Skip to content

Conversation

@sakno
Copy link
Contributor

@sakno sakno commented Aug 17, 2022

Fixes #70330

@ghost ghost added area-System.Numerics community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member labels Aug 17, 2022
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 17, 2022

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-numerics
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Fixes #70330

Author: sakno
Assignees: -
Labels:

area-System.Numerics

Milestone: -

@danmoseley danmoseley changed the title Fix for issue 70330 Fix for Random failures in System.Numerics.Tests.modpowTest.ModPowAxiom test Aug 18, 2022
@danmoseley
Copy link
Member

Updated the title -- issue numbers in titles don't work well when looking at lists of PR's 😸

@danmoseley
Copy link
Member

.NET 7 port needed?

@sakno
Copy link
Contributor Author

sakno commented Aug 18, 2022

@danmoseley , I I think yes, .NET 7 port is needed because without the fix ModPow operation gives incorrect result for some corner cases.

Copy link
Contributor

@dakersnar dakersnar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, nice catch. Thanks for the fix!

power >>= 1;
}

return result.Slice(0, resultLength);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was this slice basically unnecessary in all cases, and causing problems in this edge case?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, correct. It doesn't exist for overload of PowCore with exponent of arbitrary length.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removing this slice introduced a regression for the case of:

value: 174475926811173371108797680334274448482027679060635889276326576767485928691470272416521788770673419883076040463212449631887959313694345475337324466914914839368969988215395980439434099840700753576299320684517028939674493640310781015739837159625716992654178036326745036841619965661654305787656989089177185300627
exponent: 152266387011071825363527751452194927195391511201743678326712300944812006670853968954038119879530327815990523885596782666640476470053822766345969220504425389995206265094671158964311234812226260664473986637197447367726400093404731405598815953979171704175885394570388678952091206779039984338579147114424357147650
modulus: 15548277136038299103

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In this scenario, the length of result is greater than the length of bits and so the result.CopyTo(bits) operation fails as the destination is too short.

I expect the actual issue here is that resultLength isn't being correctly tracked somewhere.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Its not that resultLength is incorrect, its that bits will have been mutated and may contain temporary data

@dakersnar
Copy link
Contributor

@danmoseley Yes, I'd like to get this in for .NET 7, as this is a regression from .NET 6.

@dakersnar dakersnar merged commit bee9904 into dotnet:main Aug 18, 2022
@dakersnar
Copy link
Contributor

/backport to release/7.0-rc1

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0-rc1: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/2885517952

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Numerics community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Random failures in System.Numerics.Tests.modpowTest.ModPowAxiom test

4 participants