-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 201
[9.1] (backport #10103) Update code ownership of core-components.yml #10114
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
* Update code ownership of core-components.yml With increased components' movement, the role of `core-components.yml` is becoming critical. The ingest docs team is not qualified to decide on the content of that file. This PR suggests adding the PM and EM for these file decisions as exclusive owners of the file. That also means they would be gating components updates and changes in each Collector release. * Add group * Update CODEOWNERS (cherry picked from commit 8079da9) # Conflicts: # .github/CODEOWNERS
|
Cherry-pick of 8079da9 has failed: To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally |
|
This pull request is now in conflicts. Could you fix it? 🙏 |
|
This pull request has not been merged yet. Could you please review and merge it @theletterf? 🙏 |
1 similar comment
|
This pull request has not been merged yet. Could you please review and merge it @theletterf? 🙏 |
|
@theletterf reminder to please revisit this backport PR, address the conflicts, and merge when possible. |
|
This pull request has not been merged yet. Could you please review and merge it @theletterf? 🙏 |
1 similar comment
|
This pull request has not been merged yet. Could you please review and merge it @theletterf? 🙏 |
With increased components' movement, the role of
core-components.ymlis becoming critical. The ingest docs team is not qualified to decide on the content of that file.This PR suggests adding the PM and EM for these file decisions as exclusive owners of the file. That also means they would be gating components updates and changes in each Collector release.
Case in point: the status of some new receivers in #9344
+CC @mlunadia @AlexanderWert @colleenmcginnis
This is an automatic backport of pull request #10103 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).