Skip to content

TEST: use stub GH action workflow to test new LS version action [NOT FOR MERGE] #18050

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 23 commits into from
Closed

TEST: use stub GH action workflow to test new LS version action [NOT FOR MERGE] #18050

wants to merge 23 commits into from

Conversation

@donoghuc
Copy link
Member

@donoghuc donoghuc commented Aug 27, 2025 •
edited
Loading

TEST: use stub GH action workflow to test action

This PR is not meant to be merged. It is for demonstrating a successful action run for #18035

@donoghuc donoghuc requested review from a team as code owners August 27, 2025 22:21
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🤖 GitHub comments

Expand to view the GitHub comments

Just comment with:

  • run docs-build : Re-trigger the docs validation. (use unformatted text in the comment!)

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Aug 27, 2025

This pull request does not have a backport label. Could you fix it @donoghuc? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
branches, such as:

  • backport-8./d is the label to automatically backport to the 8./d branch. /d is the digit.
  • If no backport is necessary, please add the backport-skip label

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Aug 27, 2025

⚠️ The sha of the head commit of this PR conflicts with #18035. Mergify cannot evaluate rules on this PR. ⚠️

1 similar comment
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Aug 27, 2025

⚠️ The sha of the head commit of this PR conflicts with #18035. Mergify cannot evaluate rules on this PR. ⚠️

@donoghuc
Copy link
Member Author

Used this https://github.com/elastic/logstash/actions/runs/17280779831/job/49048532820 to raise #18052

@donoghuc donoghuc changed the title TEST: use stub GH action workflow to test new LS version action TEST: use stub GH action workflow to test new LS version action [NOT FOR MERGE] Aug 27, 2025
@donoghuc donoghuc mentioned this pull request Aug 27, 2025
Merged
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Aug 27, 2025

⚠️ The sha of the head commit of this PR conflicts with #18035. Mergify cannot evaluate rules on this PR. ⚠️

1 similar comment
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 4, 2025

⚠️ The sha of the head commit of this PR conflicts with #18035. Mergify cannot evaluate rules on this PR. ⚠️

@donoghuc donoghuc force-pushed the bump-ls-version-action branch from 68d599f to 972aed3 Compare September 8, 2025 22:25
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 8, 2025

⚠️ The sha of the head commit of this PR conflicts with #18035. Mergify cannot evaluate rules on this PR. ⚠️

2 similar comments
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 8, 2025

⚠️ The sha of the head commit of this PR conflicts with #18035. Mergify cannot evaluate rules on this PR. ⚠️

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 8, 2025

⚠️ The sha of the head commit of this PR conflicts with #18035. Mergify cannot evaluate rules on this PR. ⚠️

@donoghuc
GH action for updating logstash version
95119ee 
This commit adds a GH action for bumping the logstash version. It uses the
updatescli based on a suggestion for how the beats team is doing file updates.
There is a workflow_dispatch trigger that accepts a new logstash version. Both
the versions.yml and lock file are updated. If it is a branch where we are not
vendoring a lockfile that file is skipped without failing the workflow step.
@donoghuc
use stub workflow to test
e75a275
@donoghuc
Separate step when modifying
9f2a3bd
@donoghuc
dont track temp updatecli file and install action
3d29a0a
@donoghuc
restore stub
fafaf94
@donoghuc
Refactor updatecli workflow
beab304 
use pattern suggested in code review
@donoghuc
Use test stub to validate changes
537f00d
@donoghuc
fix inputs section
f7bf2c6
@donoghuc
fix branch
5eb366e
@donoghuc
dont fail if file is not present
c0b7aab
@donoghuc
try with no global conditionals
bc2f8da
@donoghuc
file condition
76da246
@donoghuc
name conditional
65baa46
@donoghuc donoghuc force-pushed the bump-ls-version-action branch from 1051c59 to b7bf644 Compare September 9, 2025 22:02
@donoghuc donoghuc force-pushed the bump-ls-version-action branch from b7bf644 to d53ef1d Compare September 9, 2025 22:12
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 9, 2025

⚠️ The sha of the head commit of this PR conflicts with #18035. Mergify cannot evaluate rules on this PR. ⚠️

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 12, 2025

⚠️ The sha of the head commit of this PR conflicts with #18035. Mergify cannot evaluate rules on this PR. ⚠️

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 12, 2025

⚠️ The sha of the head commit of this PR conflicts with #18035. Mergify cannot evaluate rules on this PR. ⚠️

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 16, 2025

⚠️ The sha of the head commit of this PR conflicts with #18035. Mergify cannot evaluate rules on this PR. ⚠️

@elastic-sonarqube
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

💛 Build succeeded, but was flaky

Failed CI Steps

History

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 17, 2025

⚠️ The sha of the head commit of this PR conflicts with #18035. Mergify cannot evaluate rules on this PR. ⚠️

@donoghuc donoghuc closed this Sep 23, 2025
@donoghuc donoghuc deleted the bump-ls-version-action branch September 23, 2025 22:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@donoghuc @elasticmachine