Skip to content

Conversation

@bmish
Copy link
Member

@bmish bmish commented Jul 7, 2022

  • Improve/simplify wording
  • Add context including link to approved RFC with latest plans for ESLint v9
  • Remove redundant examples from rule doc

@bmish bmish changed the title docs: improve and modernize doc for prefer-object-rule rule docs: modernize doc for prefer-object-rule rule Jul 7, 2022
@bmish bmish force-pushed the prefer-object-rule-doc-update branch from aa8e3f9 to 8341bfe Compare July 7, 2022 22:28
@bmish bmish changed the title docs: modernize doc for prefer-object-rule rule docs: modernize rule doc for prefer-object-rule rule Jul 7, 2022
@bmish bmish changed the title docs: modernize rule doc for prefer-object-rule rule docs: modernize rule doc for prefer-object-rule Jul 7, 2022
@aladdin-add aladdin-add merged commit f90478c into eslint-community:main Jul 8, 2022
bmish added a commit to bmish/eslint-plugin-eslint-plugin that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2022
* main:
  docs: modernize rule doc for `no-identical-tests` (eslint-community#265)
  docs: modernize rule doc for `require-meta-schema` (eslint-community#266)
  docs: modernize rule doc for `prefer-object-rule` (eslint-community#264)
  docs: modernize rule doc for `consistent-output` (eslint-community#263)
  chore: run version-specific CI jobs on Node 18 (eslint-community#260)
bmish added a commit to bmish/eslint-plugin-eslint-plugin that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2022
* main:
  docs: modernize rule doc for `no-identical-tests` (eslint-community#265)
  docs: modernize rule doc for `require-meta-schema` (eslint-community#266)
  docs: modernize rule doc for `prefer-object-rule` (eslint-community#264)
  docs: modernize rule doc for `consistent-output` (eslint-community#263)
  chore: run version-specific CI jobs on Node 18 (eslint-community#260)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants