Skip to content

Conversation

SergioGasquez
Copy link
Member

@SergioGasquez SergioGasquez commented Jun 27, 2023

No description provided.

@jessebraham
Copy link
Member

jessebraham commented Jun 27, 2023

Thanks for looking into this! At first glance I think this actually looks quite good. I was expecting ci.yml to be messier than it is, so that's great.

I will do a proper review when I get a chance but I expect it's likely fine as-is.

@jnross
Copy link
Contributor

jnross commented Aug 27, 2023

I like the idea of this one. I was recently bouncing between the two CI workflows while debugging a CI issue and wondering why they were split.

@jessebraham
Copy link
Member

jessebraham commented Sep 12, 2023

Sorry it's been awhile 😅 I think this looks fine, if you wouldn't mind updating it (our workflow has changed since this PR was opened, so we need to be careful to reflect those changes) then I think we can merge this.

Please just convert this from a draft and request a review when you're ready!

@SergioGasquez SergioGasquez mentioned this pull request Sep 13, 2023
@SergioGasquez
Copy link
Member Author

Closed in favor of #470

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants