Skip to content

Conversation

@etan-status
Copy link
Contributor

Align MAX_VERSIONED_HASHES_LIST_SIZE with LIMIT_BLOBS_PER_TX and MAX_TX_WRAP_KZG_COMMITMENTS changes from #6500.

assert len(versioned_hashes) == len(commitments) == len(blobs)

Align `MAX_VERSIONED_HASHES_LIST_SIZE` with `LIMIT_BLOBS_PER_TX` and
`MAX_TX_WRAP_KZG_COMMITMENTS` changes from ethereum#6500.

```python
assert len(versioned_hashes) == len(commitments) == len(blobs)
```
@github-actions github-actions bot added c-update Modifies an existing proposal s-draft This EIP is a Draft s-review This EIP is in Review t-core labels Feb 15, 2023
@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Feb 15, 2023

File EIPS/eip-4844.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @adietrichs, @asn-d6, @dankrad, @Inphi, @lightclient, @protolambda, @vbuterin

@etan-status etan-status marked this pull request as ready for review April 27, 2023 20:32
@etan-status etan-status requested a review from eth-bot as a code owner April 27, 2023 20:32
@eth-bot eth-bot added the a-review Waiting on author to review label Apr 27, 2023
| `MIN_DATA_GASPRICE` | `1` |
| `DATA_GASPRICE_UPDATE_FRACTION` | `2225652` |
| `MAX_VERSIONED_HASHES_LIST_SIZE` | `2**24` |
| `MAX_VERSIONED_HASHES_LIST_SIZE` | `2**12` |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
| `MAX_VERSIONED_HASHES_LIST_SIZE` | `2**12` |
| `MAX_TX_VERSIONED_HASHES_LIST_SIZE` | `2**12` |

should we also add _TX_ to sort of correspond with other limits?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, I think aligning the values and renaming them should be separate discussions / PRs.

@g11tech
Copy link
Contributor

g11tech commented May 2, 2023

I think an approval is required from one of the authors

@lightclient
Copy link
Member

closing this as we are no longer pursuing SSZ in 4844

@etan-status etan-status deleted the tx-syncblobslimit branch May 30, 2023 09:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

a-review Waiting on author to review c-update Modifies an existing proposal s-draft This EIP is a Draft s-review This EIP is in Review t-core

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants