Skip to content

Conversation

@rawlingsj
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@rawlingsj
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR includes the upgrade of kubernetes-model to using openshift and kubernetes 1.5.x

@rawlingsj
Copy link
Contributor Author

@iocanel @jimmidyson I've rebased this PR, would you be able to review when you get 2 mins and we can release it, I'll then take care of fabric8, fabric8-maven-plugin and downstream projects. Thanks

Copy link
Contributor

@jimmidyson jimmidyson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK let's go for it.

import io.fabric8.kubernetes.api.model.extensions.IngressList;
import io.fabric8.kubernetes.api.model.extensions.Job;
import io.fabric8.kubernetes.api.model.extensions.JobList;
import io.fabric8.kubernetes.api.model.Job;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These packages shouldn't have changed. Let me take a look at the model again - will do that now.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm this is really a breaking change in kube model that would affect anyone using the existing Job stuff, but this is caused by the change in go package to batch from apps. Thoughts on what to do here? I'm kind of thinking this is OK now but we should at least bump model version to 1.1 with this change (strictly speaking it should be 2 as breaking change).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

how about we go for version 2?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

version 2 sounds good to me

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done - can you bump version to 2.0-SNAPSHOT then please

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure thing

@jimmidyson
Copy link
Contributor

@iocanel Any concerns with this before I merge?

@iocanel
Copy link
Member

iocanel commented Feb 7, 2017

@jimmidyson: No concerns from my side.

@jimmidyson
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @rawlingsj - [merge]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants