Skip to content

Conversation

tagboola
Copy link
Contributor

@tagboola tagboola commented Oct 9, 2025

Description

The build was failing with the following error

Error: src/mcp/tools/apptesting/tests.ts(50,9): error TS2345: Argument of type '{ version?: string; locale?: string; model?: string; orientation?: "portrait" | "landscape"; }[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'TestDevice[]'.
  Type '{ version?: string; locale?: string; model?: string; orientation?: "portrait" | "landscape"; }' is not assignable to type 'TestDevice'.
    Property 'model' is optional in type '{ version?: string; locale?: string; model?: string; orientation?: "portrait" | "landscape"; }' but required in type 'TestDevice'.

So I made all the fields in TestDeviceSchema required.

Scenarios Tested

Sample Commands

Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @tagboola, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a potential error by refining the schema definition for TestDevice within the application testing tools. By transitioning from an explicit object definition to leveraging z.custom with an imported TestDevice type, the change aims to enhance type consistency and prevent validation issues, ensuring that the TestDevice schema accurately reflects its intended structure.

Highlights

  • Schema Definition Refinement: The TestDeviceSchema in src/mcp/tools/apptesting/tests.ts has been updated to utilize z.custom<TestDevice>(). This change replaces an inline z.object definition, aligning the schema with the canonical TestDevice type imported from ../../../appdistribution/types.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request addresses an error by changing the Zod schema for TestDevice. It replaces a z.object with z.custom<TestDevice>(). While this fixes the type conflict that likely caused the error, it also removes validation of the object's structure. My review includes a suggestion to use a corrected z.object schema instead. This approach maintains type safety and validation, which is important when dealing with data from external sources.

@tagboola tagboola changed the title Prefer z.custom for TestDevice type to fix error Make fields in TestDeviceSchema required Oct 9, 2025
@tagboola tagboola requested a review from jrothfeder October 9, 2025 18:04
@tagboola tagboola closed this Oct 14, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Approved [PR] to Done in [Cloud] Extensions + Functions Oct 14, 2025
@tagboola tagboola deleted the tagboola/prefer-custom branch October 14, 2025 16:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants