Revert " Closes #10 from gengliangwang/revert." #11
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
gengliangwang
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2024
…n properly
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make `ResolveRelations` handle plan id properly
### Why are the changes needed?
bug fix for Spark Connect, it won't affect classic Spark SQL
before this PR:
```
from pyspark.sql import functions as sf
spark.range(10).withColumn("value_1", sf.lit(1)).write.saveAsTable("test_table_1")
spark.range(10).withColumnRenamed("id", "index").withColumn("value_2", sf.lit(2)).write.saveAsTable("test_table_2")
df1 = spark.read.table("test_table_1")
df2 = spark.read.table("test_table_2")
df3 = spark.read.table("test_table_1")
join1 = df1.join(df2, on=df1.id==df2.index).select(df2.index, df2.value_2)
join2 = df3.join(join1, how="left", on=join1.index==df3.id)
join2.schema
```
fails with
```
AnalysisException: [CANNOT_RESOLVE_DATAFRAME_COLUMN] Cannot resolve dataframe column "id". It's probably because of illegal references like `df1.select(df2.col("a"))`. SQLSTATE: 42704
```
That is due to existing plan caching in `ResolveRelations` doesn't work with Spark Connect
```
=== Applying Rule org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveRelations ===
'[#12]Join LeftOuter, '`==`('index, 'id) '[#12]Join LeftOuter, '`==`('index, 'id)
!:- '[#9]UnresolvedRelation [test_table_1], [], false :- '[#9]SubqueryAlias spark_catalog.default.test_table_1
!+- '[#11]Project ['index, 'value_2] : +- 'UnresolvedCatalogRelation `spark_catalog`.`default`.`test_table_1`, [], false
! +- '[#10]Join Inner, '`==`('id, 'index) +- '[#11]Project ['index, 'value_2]
! :- '[#7]UnresolvedRelation [test_table_1], [], false +- '[#10]Join Inner, '`==`('id, 'index)
! +- '[#8]UnresolvedRelation [test_table_2], [], false :- '[#9]SubqueryAlias spark_catalog.default.test_table_1
! : +- 'UnresolvedCatalogRelation `spark_catalog`.`default`.`test_table_1`, [], false
! +- '[#8]SubqueryAlias spark_catalog.default.test_table_2
! +- 'UnresolvedCatalogRelation `spark_catalog`.`default`.`test_table_2`, [], false
Can not resolve 'id with plan 7
```
`[#7]UnresolvedRelation [test_table_1], [], false` was wrongly resolved to the cached one
```
:- '[#9]SubqueryAlias spark_catalog.default.test_table_1
+- 'UnresolvedCatalogRelation `spark_catalog`.`default`.`test_table_1`, [], false
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
yes, bug fix
### How was this patch tested?
added ut
### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
ci
Closes apache#45214 from zhengruifeng/connect_fix_read_join.
Authored-by: Ruifeng Zheng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
gengliangwang
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 1, 2024
…plan properly ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Make `ResolveRelations` handle plan id properly cherry-pick bugfix apache#45214 to 3.5 ### Why are the changes needed? bug fix for Spark Connect, it won't affect classic Spark SQL before this PR: ``` from pyspark.sql import functions as sf spark.range(10).withColumn("value_1", sf.lit(1)).write.saveAsTable("test_table_1") spark.range(10).withColumnRenamed("id", "index").withColumn("value_2", sf.lit(2)).write.saveAsTable("test_table_2") df1 = spark.read.table("test_table_1") df2 = spark.read.table("test_table_2") df3 = spark.read.table("test_table_1") join1 = df1.join(df2, on=df1.id==df2.index).select(df2.index, df2.value_2) join2 = df3.join(join1, how="left", on=join1.index==df3.id) join2.schema ``` fails with ``` AnalysisException: [CANNOT_RESOLVE_DATAFRAME_COLUMN] Cannot resolve dataframe column "id". It's probably because of illegal references like `df1.select(df2.col("a"))`. SQLSTATE: 42704 ``` That is due to existing plan caching in `ResolveRelations` doesn't work with Spark Connect ``` === Applying Rule org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveRelations === '[#12]Join LeftOuter, '`==`('index, 'id) '[#12]Join LeftOuter, '`==`('index, 'id) !:- '[#9]UnresolvedRelation [test_table_1], [], false :- '[#9]SubqueryAlias spark_catalog.default.test_table_1 !+- '[#11]Project ['index, 'value_2] : +- 'UnresolvedCatalogRelation `spark_catalog`.`default`.`test_table_1`, [], false ! +- '[#10]Join Inner, '`==`('id, 'index) +- '[#11]Project ['index, 'value_2] ! :- '[#7]UnresolvedRelation [test_table_1], [], false +- '[#10]Join Inner, '`==`('id, 'index) ! +- '[#8]UnresolvedRelation [test_table_2], [], false :- '[#9]SubqueryAlias spark_catalog.default.test_table_1 ! : +- 'UnresolvedCatalogRelation `spark_catalog`.`default`.`test_table_1`, [], false ! +- '[#8]SubqueryAlias spark_catalog.default.test_table_2 ! +- 'UnresolvedCatalogRelation `spark_catalog`.`default`.`test_table_2`, [], false Can not resolve 'id with plan 7 ``` `[#7]UnresolvedRelation [test_table_1], [], false` was wrongly resolved to the cached one ``` :- '[#9]SubqueryAlias spark_catalog.default.test_table_1 +- 'UnresolvedCatalogRelation `spark_catalog`.`default`.`test_table_1`, [], false ``` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? yes, bug fix ### How was this patch tested? added ut ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? ci Closes apache#46291 from zhengruifeng/connect_fix_read_join_35. Authored-by: Ruifeng Zheng <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Zheng <[email protected]>
gengliangwang
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 18, 2024
…r `postgreSQL/float4.sql` and `postgreSQL/int8.sql` ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This pr regenerate Java 21 golden file for `postgreSQL/float4.sql` and `postgreSQL/int8.sql` to fix Java 21 daily test. ### Why are the changes needed? Fix Java 21 daily test: - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/10823897095/job/30030200710 ``` [info] - postgreSQL/float4.sql *** FAILED *** (1 second, 100 milliseconds) [info] postgreSQL/float4.sql [info] Expected "...arameters" : { [info] "[ansiConfig" : "\"spark.sql.ansi.enabled\"", [info] "]expression" : "'N A ...", but got "...arameters" : { [info] "[]expression" : "'N A ..." Result did not match for query #11 [info] SELECT float('N A N') (SQLQueryTestSuite.scala:663) ... [info] - postgreSQL/int8.sql *** FAILED *** (2 seconds, 474 milliseconds) [info] postgreSQL/int8.sql [info] Expected "...arameters" : { [info] "[ansiConfig" : "\"spark.sql.ansi.enabled\"", [info] "]sourceType" : "\"BIG...", but got "...arameters" : { [info] "[]sourceType" : "\"BIG..." Result did not match for query apache#66 [info] SELECT CAST(q1 AS int) FROM int8_tbl WHERE q2 <> 456 (SQLQueryTestSuite.scala:663) ... [info] *** 2 TESTS FAILED *** [error] Failed: Total 3559, Failed 2, Errors 0, Passed 3557, Ignored 4 [error] Failed tests: [error] org.apache.spark.sql.SQLQueryTestSuite [error] (sql / Test / test) sbt.TestsFailedException: Tests unsuccessful ``` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? - Pass Github Acitons - Manual checked: `build/sbt "sql/testOnly org.apache.spark.sql.SQLQueryTestSuite" with Java 21, all test passed ` ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No Closes apache#48089 from LuciferYang/SPARK-49578-FOLLOWUP. Authored-by: yangjie01 <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
gengliangwang
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2025
…e` building ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR aims to add `libwebp-dev` to recover `spark-rm/Dockerfile` building. ### Why are the changes needed? `Apache Spark` release docker image compilation has been broken for last 7 days due to the SparkR package compilation. - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/workflows/release.yml - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/17425825244 ``` #11 559.4 No package 'libwebpmux' found ... #11 559.4 -------------------------- [ERROR MESSAGE] --------------------------- #11 559.4 <stdin>:1:10: fatal error: ft2build.h: No such file or directory #11 559.4 compilation terminated. #11 559.4 -------------------------------------------------------------------- #11 559.4 ERROR: configuration failed for package 'ragg' ``` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No, this is a fix for Apache Spark release tool. ### How was this patch tested? Manually build. ``` $ cd dev/create-release/spark-rm $ docker build . ``` **BEFORE** ``` ... Dockerfile:83 -------------------- 82 | # See more in SPARK-39959, roxygen2 < 7.2.1 83 | >>> RUN Rscript -e "install.packages(c('devtools', 'knitr', 'markdown', \ 84 | >>> 'rmarkdown', 'testthat', 'devtools', 'e1071', 'survival', 'arrow', \ 85 | >>> 'ggplot2', 'mvtnorm', 'statmod', 'xml2'), repos='https://cloud.r-project.org/')" && \ 86 | >>> Rscript -e "devtools::install_version('roxygen2', version='7.2.0', repos='https://cloud.r-project.org')" && \ 87 | >>> Rscript -e "devtools::install_version('lintr', version='2.0.1', repos='https://cloud.r-project.org')" && \ 88 | >>> Rscript -e "devtools::install_version('pkgdown', version='2.0.1', repos='https://cloud.r-project.org')" && \ 89 | >>> Rscript -e "devtools::install_version('preferably', version='0.4', repos='https://cloud.r-project.org')" 90 | -------------------- ERROR: failed to build: failed to solve: ``` **AFTER** ``` ... => [ 6/22] RUN add-apt-repository 'deb https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu jammy-cran40/' 3.8s => [ 7/22] RUN Rscript -e "install.packages(c('devtools', 'knitr', 'markdown', 'rmarkdown', 'testthat', 'devtools', 'e1071', 'survival', 'arrow', 892.2s => [ 8/22] RUN add-apt-repository ppa:pypy/ppa 15.3s ... ``` After merging this PR, we can validate via the daily release dry-run CI. - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/workflows/release.yml ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes apache#52290 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-53539. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This reverts commit b72c63e.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Why are the changes needed?
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
How was this patch tested?