Skip to content

Conversation

@loewenheim
Copy link
Contributor

We stopped routing events to the process_event_proguard task (and therefore the events.process_event_proguard queue) in #74075. The store.separate-proguard-queue-rate option was removed from the options automator in https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-options-automator/pull/1895.

@loewenheim loewenheim requested a review from a team July 12, 2024 13:19
@loewenheim loewenheim self-assigned this Jul 12, 2024
@loewenheim loewenheim requested a review from Swatinem July 12, 2024 13:19
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Scope: Backend Automatically applied to PRs that change backend components label Jul 12, 2024
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.19%. Comparing base (2a0df0c) to head (0c0d977).
Report is 6 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #74198   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.19%   78.19%           
=======================================
  Files        6659     6659           
  Lines      297424   297420    -4     
  Branches    51184    51183    -1     
=======================================
- Hits       232584   232582    -2     
+ Misses      58525    58523    -2     
  Partials     6315     6315           
Files Coverage Δ
src/sentry/conf/server.py 87.80% <ø> (ø)
src/sentry/options/defaults.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/sentry/tasks/store.py 82.32% <ø> (+0.19%) ⬆️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Member

@Swatinem Swatinem left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉 next step, kill the deployment, then profit

@loewenheim loewenheim merged commit 1b13e98 into master Jul 15, 2024
@loewenheim loewenheim deleted the ref/proguard-remove-separate-queue branch July 15, 2024 09:28
@loewenheim loewenheim added the Trigger: Revert Add to a merged PR to revert it (skips CI) label Jul 15, 2024
@loewenheim
Copy link
Contributor Author

Reverting this, the worker first needs to be removed in ops.

@getsentry-bot
Copy link
Contributor

PR reverted: a1ab12d

getsentry-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2024
@loewenheim loewenheim restored the ref/proguard-remove-separate-queue branch July 15, 2024 12:57
loewenheim added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2024
@loewenheim loewenheim deleted the ref/proguard-remove-separate-queue branch July 15, 2024 13:33
priscilawebdev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2024
We stopped routing events to the `process_event_proguard` task (and
therefore the `events.process_event_proguard` queue) in
#74075. The
`store.separate-proguard-queue-rate` option was removed from the options
automator in
getsentry/sentry-options-automator#1895.
priscilawebdev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2024
priscilawebdev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 11, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Scope: Backend Automatically applied to PRs that change backend components Trigger: Revert Add to a merged PR to revert it (skips CI)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants