Update high_level_multiplayer.rst #7748
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
classref: Sync with current 4.1 branch (6884be6)
Update documentation to reflect the newest multiplayer API changes. In specific, multiplayer methods from get_tree() were moved to get_multiplayer(). It is possible to use get_tree().get_multiplayer, but I find that would be overly verbose. In addition, not all code updates here were tested. Feedback appreciated.
Member
Contributor
Author
|
Thank you! I will do! Glad it was already reported. |
Member
|
What I mean is that there is already a PR open for this, this is a duplicate |
Contributor
Author
|
Closed. Sorry for the confusion. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update documentation to reflect the newest multiplayer API changes. In specific, multiplayer methods from get_tree() were moved to get_multiplayer(). It is possible to use get_tree().get_multiplayer(), but I find that would be overly verbose. In addition, not all code updates here were tested. Feedback appreciated.