markup/org: add custom org link resolve function for denote
#13865
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The go-org library used by hugo to parse `.org` files now supports custom link resolvers. This PR uses the new functionality to add support for [denote](https://protesilaos.com/emacs/denote) style links. This can be used to publish note libraries as-is using hugo. I've written about the details in a blog post [here](https://dominik.suess.wtf/posts/2025/01/02/denote-hugo/). I don't know if this functionality is too specific to my usecase so I'm happy to discuss alternatives which could be more modular/adaptable to other systems.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The go-org library used by hugo to parse
.orgfiles now supports custom link resolvers. This PR uses the new functionality to add support for denote style links.This can be used to publish notes as-is using hugo.
I've written about the details in a blog post here.
I don't know if this functionality is too specific to my use case, so I'm happy to discuss alternatives which could be more modular/adaptable to other systems.