fix(querier): Support multi-tenant queries in Patterns API #19809
+120
−4
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
|
thanks for the contribution! I'll take a look at this today or tomorrow. |
Contributor
Author
|
Many thanks @trevorwhitney 🙏 |
trevorwhitney
approved these changes
Nov 14, 2025
Collaborator
trevorwhitney
left a comment
trevorwhitney
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
clean and simple, looks great, thanks for the contribution!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR enables support for multi-tenant queries into the Patterns API, which currently does not work when multiple tenants are sent in the
X-Scope-OrgIdheader.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #13528
Special notes for your reviewer:
Checklist
CONTRIBUTING.mdguide (required)featPRs are unlikely to be accepted unless a case can be made for the feature actually being a bug fix to existing behavior.