Fine grained directive filtering in printing #1721
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bbakerman
approved these changes
Jan 5, 2020
Member
bbakerman
left a comment
bbakerman
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for this.
I like how you kept backwards compatibility while enhancing the API. Nice one!
This was referenced Jan 18, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Further ability to filter what directives get printed. My use-case is hiding individual internal directives (while exposing the rest) from SDL processing tools, like Apollo Federation. It potentially helps with #1017 as well. Relates to #1587 too.
Not sure if this is ready to merge, opened it more as a discussion point.