This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2020. It is now read-only.
Feature go to definition SDL - input, enum, type #237
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
asiandrummer
approved these changes
Jun 2, 2018
README.md
Outdated
| - Diagnostics (GraphQL syntax linting/validations) (**spec-compliant**) | ||
| - Autocomplete suggestions (**spec-compliant**) | ||
| - Hyperlink to fragment definitions (**spec-compliant**) | ||
| - Hyperlink to named types (type, input, enum) definitions (**spec-compliant**) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Lets just merge it above:
Hyperlink to fragment and named types (type, input, enum) definitions
Merged
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implement go to definition for input, enum, type in SDL with some test cases
Support live file reload
Fixes a related test case in
getDefinitionthat was found while implementing this part of code i.e. I think it belongs hereThanks! :)