enable DDR50 for tegra30 in nvquirks of sdhci driver #28
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
# Conflicts: # arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c
# Conflicts: # arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
# Conflicts: # drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
# Conflicts: # drivers/of/property.c
# Conflicts: # drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c # drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
# Conflicts: # net/nfc/nci/uart.c
# Conflicts: # drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
digetx
force-pushed
the
master
branch
8 times, most recently
from
3b743c4 to
1649e78
Compare
digetx
force-pushed
the
master
branch
3 times, most recently
from
d6f9f6e to
ea24140
Compare
digetx
force-pushed
the
master
branch
2 times, most recently
from
d32ec4b to
53a0c25
Compare
|
Wouldn't adding the |
digetx
force-pushed
the
master
branch
2 times, most recently
from
dde5676 to
d43dd42
Compare
I don't think that would be enough, as I can't see how this: linux/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c Lines 406 to 407 in d43dd42 can be triggered just by using a device-tree property… But correct me if I am mistaken. |
|
The |
|
Well, then I agree on the device-tree entry being the best solution, thank you very much! |
digetx
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2021
…xtent When cloning an inline extent there are a few cases, such as when we have an implicit hole at file offset 0, where we start a transaction while holding a read lock on a leaf. Starting the transaction results in a call to sb_start_intwrite(), which results in doing a read lock on a percpu semaphore. Lockdep doesn't like this and complains about it: [46.580704] ====================================================== [46.580752] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [46.580799] 5.13.0-rc1 #28 Not tainted [46.580832] ------------------------------------------------------ [46.580877] cloner/3835 is trying to acquire lock: [46.580918] c00000001301d638 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: clone_copy_inline_extent+0xe4/0x5a0 [46.581167] [46.581167] but task is already holding lock: [46.581217] c000000007fa2550 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x70/0x1d0 [46.581293] [46.581293] which lock already depends on the new lock. [46.581293] [46.581351] [46.581351] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [46.581410] [46.581410] -> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: [46.581464] down_read_nested+0x68/0x200 [46.581536] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x70/0x1d0 [46.581577] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x88/0x200 [46.581623] btrfs_search_slot+0x298/0xb70 [46.581665] btrfs_set_inode_index+0xfc/0x260 [46.581708] btrfs_new_inode+0x26c/0x950 [46.581749] btrfs_create+0xf4/0x2b0 [46.581782] lookup_open.isra.57+0x55c/0x6a0 [46.581855] path_openat+0x418/0xd20 [46.581888] do_filp_open+0x9c/0x130 [46.581920] do_sys_openat2+0x2ec/0x430 [46.581961] do_sys_open+0x90/0xc0 [46.581993] system_call_exception+0x3d4/0x410 [46.582037] system_call_common+0xec/0x278 [46.582078] [46.582078] -> #0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: [46.582135] __lock_acquire+0x1e90/0x2c50 [46.582176] lock_acquire+0x2b4/0x5b0 [46.582263] start_transaction+0x3cc/0x950 [46.582308] clone_copy_inline_extent+0xe4/0x5a0 [46.582353] btrfs_clone+0x5fc/0x880 [46.582388] btrfs_clone_files+0xd8/0x1c0 [46.582434] btrfs_remap_file_range+0x3d8/0x590 [46.582481] do_clone_file_range+0x10c/0x270 [46.582558] vfs_clone_file_range+0x1b0/0x310 [46.582605] ioctl_file_clone+0x90/0x130 [46.582651] do_vfs_ioctl+0x874/0x1ac0 [46.582697] sys_ioctl+0x6c/0x120 [46.582733] system_call_exception+0x3d4/0x410 [46.582777] system_call_common+0xec/0x278 [46.582822] [46.582822] other info that might help us debug this: [46.582822] [46.582888] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [46.582888] [46.582942] CPU0 CPU1 [46.582984] ---- ---- [46.583028] lock(btrfs-tree-00); [46.583062] lock(sb_internal#2); [46.583119] lock(btrfs-tree-00); [46.583174] lock(sb_internal#2); [46.583212] [46.583212] *** DEADLOCK *** [46.583212] [46.583266] 6 locks held by cloner/3835: [46.583299] #0: c00000001301d448 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ioctl_file_clone+0x90/0x130 [46.583382] #1: c00000000f6d3768 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_two_nondirectories+0x58/0xc0 [46.583477] #2: c00000000f6d72a8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15/4){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_two_nondirectories+0x9c/0xc0 [46.583574] #3: c00000000f6d7138 (&ei->i_mmap_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_remap_file_range+0xd0/0x590 [46.583657] #4: c00000000f6d35f8 (&ei->i_mmap_lock/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_remap_file_range+0xe0/0x590 [46.583743] #5: c000000007fa2550 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x70/0x1d0 [46.583828] [46.583828] stack backtrace: [46.583872] CPU: 1 PID: 3835 Comm: cloner Not tainted 5.13.0-rc1 #28 [46.583931] Call Trace: [46.583955] [c0000000167c7200] [c000000000c1ee78] dump_stack+0xec/0x144 (unreliable) [46.584052] [c0000000167c7240] [c000000000274058] print_circular_bug.isra.32+0x3a8/0x400 [46.584123] [c0000000167c72e0] [c0000000002741f4] check_noncircular+0x144/0x190 [46.584191] [c0000000167c73b0] [c000000000278fc0] __lock_acquire+0x1e90/0x2c50 [46.584259] [c0000000167c74f0] [c00000000027aa94] lock_acquire+0x2b4/0x5b0 [46.584317] [c0000000167c75e0] [c000000000a0d6cc] start_transaction+0x3cc/0x950 [46.584388] [c0000000167c7690] [c000000000af47a4] clone_copy_inline_extent+0xe4/0x5a0 [46.584457] [c0000000167c77c0] [c000000000af525c] btrfs_clone+0x5fc/0x880 [46.584514] [c0000000167c7990] [c000000000af5698] btrfs_clone_files+0xd8/0x1c0 [46.584583] [c0000000167c7a00] [c000000000af5b58] btrfs_remap_file_range+0x3d8/0x590 [46.584652] [c0000000167c7ae0] [c0000000005d81dc] do_clone_file_range+0x10c/0x270 [46.584722] [c0000000167c7b40] [c0000000005d84f0] vfs_clone_file_range+0x1b0/0x310 [46.584793] [c0000000167c7bb0] [c00000000058bf80] ioctl_file_clone+0x90/0x130 [46.584861] [c0000000167c7c10] [c00000000058c894] do_vfs_ioctl+0x874/0x1ac0 [46.584922] [c0000000167c7d10] [c00000000058db4c] sys_ioctl+0x6c/0x120 [46.584978] [c0000000167c7d60] [c0000000000364a4] system_call_exception+0x3d4/0x410 [46.585046] [c0000000167c7e10] [c00000000000d45c] system_call_common+0xec/0x278 [46.585114] --- interrupt: c00 at 0x7ffff7e22990 [46.585160] NIP: 00007ffff7e22990 LR: 00000001000010ec CTR: 0000000000000000 [46.585224] REGS: c0000000167c7e80 TRAP: 0c00 Not tainted (5.13.0-rc1) [46.585280] MSR: 800000000280f033 <SF,VEC,VSX,EE,PR,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 28000244 XER: 00000000 [46.585374] IRQMASK: 0 [46.585374] GPR00: 0000000000000036 00007fffffffdec0 00007ffff7f17100 0000000000000004 [46.585374] GPR04: 000000008020940d 00007fffffffdf40 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR08: 0000000000000004 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR12: 0000000000000000 00007ffff7ffa940 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR20: 0000000000000000 000000009123683e 00007fffffffdf40 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR24: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 [46.585374] GPR28: 0000000100030260 0000000100030280 0000000000000003 000000000000005f [46.585919] NIP [00007ffff7e22990] 0x7ffff7e22990 [46.585964] LR [00000001000010ec] 0x1000010ec [46.586010] --- interrupt: c00 This should be a false positive, as both locks are acquired in read mode. Nevertheless, we don't need to hold a leaf locked when we start the transaction, so just release the leaf (path) before starting it. Reported-by: Ritesh Harjani <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20210513214404.xks77p566fglzgum@riteshh-domain/ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
digetx
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2021
…xtent When cloning an inline extent there are a few cases, such as when we have an implicit hole at file offset 0, where we start a transaction while holding a read lock on a leaf. Starting the transaction results in a call to sb_start_intwrite(), which results in doing a read lock on a percpu semaphore. Lockdep doesn't like this and complains about it: [46.580704] ====================================================== [46.580752] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [46.580799] 5.13.0-rc1 #28 Not tainted [46.580832] ------------------------------------------------------ [46.580877] cloner/3835 is trying to acquire lock: [46.580918] c00000001301d638 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: clone_copy_inline_extent+0xe4/0x5a0 [46.581167] [46.581167] but task is already holding lock: [46.581217] c000000007fa2550 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x70/0x1d0 [46.581293] [46.581293] which lock already depends on the new lock. [46.581293] [46.581351] [46.581351] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [46.581410] [46.581410] -> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: [46.581464] down_read_nested+0x68/0x200 [46.581536] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x70/0x1d0 [46.581577] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x88/0x200 [46.581623] btrfs_search_slot+0x298/0xb70 [46.581665] btrfs_set_inode_index+0xfc/0x260 [46.581708] btrfs_new_inode+0x26c/0x950 [46.581749] btrfs_create+0xf4/0x2b0 [46.581782] lookup_open.isra.57+0x55c/0x6a0 [46.581855] path_openat+0x418/0xd20 [46.581888] do_filp_open+0x9c/0x130 [46.581920] do_sys_openat2+0x2ec/0x430 [46.581961] do_sys_open+0x90/0xc0 [46.581993] system_call_exception+0x3d4/0x410 [46.582037] system_call_common+0xec/0x278 [46.582078] [46.582078] -> #0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: [46.582135] __lock_acquire+0x1e90/0x2c50 [46.582176] lock_acquire+0x2b4/0x5b0 [46.582263] start_transaction+0x3cc/0x950 [46.582308] clone_copy_inline_extent+0xe4/0x5a0 [46.582353] btrfs_clone+0x5fc/0x880 [46.582388] btrfs_clone_files+0xd8/0x1c0 [46.582434] btrfs_remap_file_range+0x3d8/0x590 [46.582481] do_clone_file_range+0x10c/0x270 [46.582558] vfs_clone_file_range+0x1b0/0x310 [46.582605] ioctl_file_clone+0x90/0x130 [46.582651] do_vfs_ioctl+0x874/0x1ac0 [46.582697] sys_ioctl+0x6c/0x120 [46.582733] system_call_exception+0x3d4/0x410 [46.582777] system_call_common+0xec/0x278 [46.582822] [46.582822] other info that might help us debug this: [46.582822] [46.582888] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [46.582888] [46.582942] CPU0 CPU1 [46.582984] ---- ---- [46.583028] lock(btrfs-tree-00); [46.583062] lock(sb_internal#2); [46.583119] lock(btrfs-tree-00); [46.583174] lock(sb_internal#2); [46.583212] [46.583212] *** DEADLOCK *** [46.583212] [46.583266] 6 locks held by cloner/3835: [46.583299] #0: c00000001301d448 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ioctl_file_clone+0x90/0x130 [46.583382] #1: c00000000f6d3768 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_two_nondirectories+0x58/0xc0 [46.583477] #2: c00000000f6d72a8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15/4){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_two_nondirectories+0x9c/0xc0 [46.583574] #3: c00000000f6d7138 (&ei->i_mmap_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_remap_file_range+0xd0/0x590 [46.583657] #4: c00000000f6d35f8 (&ei->i_mmap_lock/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_remap_file_range+0xe0/0x590 [46.583743] #5: c000000007fa2550 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x70/0x1d0 [46.583828] [46.583828] stack backtrace: [46.583872] CPU: 1 PID: 3835 Comm: cloner Not tainted 5.13.0-rc1 #28 [46.583931] Call Trace: [46.583955] [c0000000167c7200] [c000000000c1ee78] dump_stack+0xec/0x144 (unreliable) [46.584052] [c0000000167c7240] [c000000000274058] print_circular_bug.isra.32+0x3a8/0x400 [46.584123] [c0000000167c72e0] [c0000000002741f4] check_noncircular+0x144/0x190 [46.584191] [c0000000167c73b0] [c000000000278fc0] __lock_acquire+0x1e90/0x2c50 [46.584259] [c0000000167c74f0] [c00000000027aa94] lock_acquire+0x2b4/0x5b0 [46.584317] [c0000000167c75e0] [c000000000a0d6cc] start_transaction+0x3cc/0x950 [46.584388] [c0000000167c7690] [c000000000af47a4] clone_copy_inline_extent+0xe4/0x5a0 [46.584457] [c0000000167c77c0] [c000000000af525c] btrfs_clone+0x5fc/0x880 [46.584514] [c0000000167c7990] [c000000000af5698] btrfs_clone_files+0xd8/0x1c0 [46.584583] [c0000000167c7a00] [c000000000af5b58] btrfs_remap_file_range+0x3d8/0x590 [46.584652] [c0000000167c7ae0] [c0000000005d81dc] do_clone_file_range+0x10c/0x270 [46.584722] [c0000000167c7b40] [c0000000005d84f0] vfs_clone_file_range+0x1b0/0x310 [46.584793] [c0000000167c7bb0] [c00000000058bf80] ioctl_file_clone+0x90/0x130 [46.584861] [c0000000167c7c10] [c00000000058c894] do_vfs_ioctl+0x874/0x1ac0 [46.584922] [c0000000167c7d10] [c00000000058db4c] sys_ioctl+0x6c/0x120 [46.584978] [c0000000167c7d60] [c0000000000364a4] system_call_exception+0x3d4/0x410 [46.585046] [c0000000167c7e10] [c00000000000d45c] system_call_common+0xec/0x278 [46.585114] --- interrupt: c00 at 0x7ffff7e22990 [46.585160] NIP: 00007ffff7e22990 LR: 00000001000010ec CTR: 0000000000000000 [46.585224] REGS: c0000000167c7e80 TRAP: 0c00 Not tainted (5.13.0-rc1) [46.585280] MSR: 800000000280f033 <SF,VEC,VSX,EE,PR,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 28000244 XER: 00000000 [46.585374] IRQMASK: 0 [46.585374] GPR00: 0000000000000036 00007fffffffdec0 00007ffff7f17100 0000000000000004 [46.585374] GPR04: 000000008020940d 00007fffffffdf40 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR08: 0000000000000004 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR12: 0000000000000000 00007ffff7ffa940 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR20: 0000000000000000 000000009123683e 00007fffffffdf40 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR24: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 [46.585374] GPR28: 0000000100030260 0000000100030280 0000000000000003 000000000000005f [46.585919] NIP [00007ffff7e22990] 0x7ffff7e22990 [46.585964] LR [00000001000010ec] 0x1000010ec [46.586010] --- interrupt: c00 This should be a false positive, as both locks are acquired in read mode. Nevertheless, we don't need to hold a leaf locked when we start the transaction, so just release the leaf (path) before starting it. Reported-by: Ritesh Harjani <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20210513214404.xks77p566fglzgum@riteshh-domain/ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
digetx
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2021
When setting up a read or write to the OPB memory space, we must perform
five or six AHB writes. The ordering of these up until the trigger write
does not matter, so use writel_relaxed.
The generated code goes from (Debian GCC 10.2.1-6):
mov r8, r3
mcr 15, 0, sl, cr7, cr10, {4}
str sl, [r6, #20]
mcr 15, 0, sl, cr7, cr10, {4}
str r3, [r6, #24]
mcr 15, 0, sl, cr7, cr10, {4}
str r1, [r6, #28]
mcr 15, 0, sl, cr7, cr10, {4}
str r2, [r6, #32]
mcr 15, 0, sl, cr7, cr10, {4}
mov r1, #1
str r1, [r6, #64] ; 0x40
mcr 15, 0, sl, cr7, cr10, {4}
str r1, [r6, #4]
to this:
str r3, [r7, #20]
str r2, [r7, #24]
str r1, [r7, #28]
str r3, [r7, #64]
mov r8, #0
mcr 15, 0, r8, cr7, cr10, {4}
str r3, [r7, #4]
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jeremy Kerr <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Eddie James <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <[email protected]>
okias
pushed a commit
to okias/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2021
[ Upstream commit b5befe8 ] An srcu_struct structure that is initialized before rcu_init_geometry() will have its srcu_node hierarchy based on CONFIG_NR_CPUS. Once rcu_init_geometry() is called, this hierarchy is compressed as needed for the actual maximum number of CPUs for this system. Later on, that srcu_struct structure is confused, sometimes referring to its initial CONFIG_NR_CPUS-based hierarchy, and sometimes instead to the new num_possible_cpus() hierarchy. For example, each of its ->mynode fields continues to reference the original leaf rcu_node structures, some of which might no longer exist. On the other hand, srcu_for_each_node_breadth_first() traverses to the new node hierarchy. There are at least two bad possible outcomes to this: 1) a) A callback enqueued early on an srcu_data structure (call it *sdp) is recorded pending on sdp->mynode->srcu_data_have_cbs in srcu_funnel_gp_start() with sdp->mynode pointing to a deep leaf (say 3 levels). b) The grace period ends after rcu_init_geometry() shrinks the nodes level to a single one. srcu_gp_end() walks through the new srcu_node hierarchy without ever reaching the old leaves so the callback is never executed. This is easily reproduced on an 8 CPUs machine with CONFIG_NR_CPUS >= 32 and "rcupdate.rcu_self_test=1". The srcu_barrier() after early tests verification never completes and the boot hangs: [ 5413.141029] INFO: task swapper/0:1 blocked for more than 4915 seconds. [ 5413.147564] Not tainted 5.12.0-rc4+ grate-driver#28 [ 5413.151927] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 5413.159753] task:swapper/0 state:D stack: 0 pid: 1 ppid: 0 flags:0x00004000 [ 5413.168099] Call Trace: [ 5413.170555] __schedule+0x36c/0x930 [ 5413.174057] ? wait_for_completion+0x88/0x110 [ 5413.178423] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [ 5413.181575] schedule_timeout+0x284/0x380 [ 5413.185591] ? wait_for_completion+0x88/0x110 [ 5413.189957] ? mark_held_locks+0x61/0x80 [ 5413.193882] ? mark_held_locks+0x61/0x80 [ 5413.197809] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 [ 5413.202173] ? wait_for_completion+0x88/0x110 [ 5413.206535] wait_for_completion+0xb4/0x110 [ 5413.210724] ? srcu_torture_stats_print+0x110/0x110 [ 5413.215610] srcu_barrier+0x187/0x200 [ 5413.219277] ? rcu_tasks_verify_self_tests+0x50/0x50 [ 5413.224244] ? rdinit_setup+0x2b/0x2b [ 5413.227907] rcu_verify_early_boot_tests+0x2d/0x40 [ 5413.232700] do_one_initcall+0x63/0x310 [ 5413.236541] ? rdinit_setup+0x2b/0x2b [ 5413.240207] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x52/0x80 [ 5413.244912] kernel_init_freeable+0x253/0x28f [ 5413.249273] ? rest_init+0x250/0x250 [ 5413.252846] kernel_init+0xa/0x110 [ 5413.256257] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 2) An srcu_struct structure that is initialized before rcu_init_geometry() and used afterward will always have stale rdp->mynode references, resulting in callbacks to be missed in srcu_gp_end(), just like in the previous scenario. This commit therefore causes init_srcu_struct_nodes to initialize the geometry, if needed. This ensures that the srcu_node hierarchy is properly built and distributed from the get-go. Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Cc: Boqun Feng <[email protected]> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]> Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <[email protected]> Cc: Josh Triplett <[email protected]> Cc: Joel Fernandes <[email protected]> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
okias
pushed a commit
to okias/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 19, 2021
[ Upstream commit b5befe8 ] An srcu_struct structure that is initialized before rcu_init_geometry() will have its srcu_node hierarchy based on CONFIG_NR_CPUS. Once rcu_init_geometry() is called, this hierarchy is compressed as needed for the actual maximum number of CPUs for this system. Later on, that srcu_struct structure is confused, sometimes referring to its initial CONFIG_NR_CPUS-based hierarchy, and sometimes instead to the new num_possible_cpus() hierarchy. For example, each of its ->mynode fields continues to reference the original leaf rcu_node structures, some of which might no longer exist. On the other hand, srcu_for_each_node_breadth_first() traverses to the new node hierarchy. There are at least two bad possible outcomes to this: 1) a) A callback enqueued early on an srcu_data structure (call it *sdp) is recorded pending on sdp->mynode->srcu_data_have_cbs in srcu_funnel_gp_start() with sdp->mynode pointing to a deep leaf (say 3 levels). b) The grace period ends after rcu_init_geometry() shrinks the nodes level to a single one. srcu_gp_end() walks through the new srcu_node hierarchy without ever reaching the old leaves so the callback is never executed. This is easily reproduced on an 8 CPUs machine with CONFIG_NR_CPUS >= 32 and "rcupdate.rcu_self_test=1". The srcu_barrier() after early tests verification never completes and the boot hangs: [ 5413.141029] INFO: task swapper/0:1 blocked for more than 4915 seconds. [ 5413.147564] Not tainted 5.12.0-rc4+ grate-driver#28 [ 5413.151927] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 5413.159753] task:swapper/0 state:D stack: 0 pid: 1 ppid: 0 flags:0x00004000 [ 5413.168099] Call Trace: [ 5413.170555] __schedule+0x36c/0x930 [ 5413.174057] ? wait_for_completion+0x88/0x110 [ 5413.178423] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [ 5413.181575] schedule_timeout+0x284/0x380 [ 5413.185591] ? wait_for_completion+0x88/0x110 [ 5413.189957] ? mark_held_locks+0x61/0x80 [ 5413.193882] ? mark_held_locks+0x61/0x80 [ 5413.197809] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 [ 5413.202173] ? wait_for_completion+0x88/0x110 [ 5413.206535] wait_for_completion+0xb4/0x110 [ 5413.210724] ? srcu_torture_stats_print+0x110/0x110 [ 5413.215610] srcu_barrier+0x187/0x200 [ 5413.219277] ? rcu_tasks_verify_self_tests+0x50/0x50 [ 5413.224244] ? rdinit_setup+0x2b/0x2b [ 5413.227907] rcu_verify_early_boot_tests+0x2d/0x40 [ 5413.232700] do_one_initcall+0x63/0x310 [ 5413.236541] ? rdinit_setup+0x2b/0x2b [ 5413.240207] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x52/0x80 [ 5413.244912] kernel_init_freeable+0x253/0x28f [ 5413.249273] ? rest_init+0x250/0x250 [ 5413.252846] kernel_init+0xa/0x110 [ 5413.256257] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 2) An srcu_struct structure that is initialized before rcu_init_geometry() and used afterward will always have stale rdp->mynode references, resulting in callbacks to be missed in srcu_gp_end(), just like in the previous scenario. This commit therefore causes init_srcu_struct_nodes to initialize the geometry, if needed. This ensures that the srcu_node hierarchy is properly built and distributed from the get-go. Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Cc: Boqun Feng <[email protected]> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]> Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <[email protected]> Cc: Josh Triplett <[email protected]> Cc: Joel Fernandes <[email protected]> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
okias
pushed a commit
to okias/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 19, 2021
[ Upstream commit b5befe8 ] An srcu_struct structure that is initialized before rcu_init_geometry() will have its srcu_node hierarchy based on CONFIG_NR_CPUS. Once rcu_init_geometry() is called, this hierarchy is compressed as needed for the actual maximum number of CPUs for this system. Later on, that srcu_struct structure is confused, sometimes referring to its initial CONFIG_NR_CPUS-based hierarchy, and sometimes instead to the new num_possible_cpus() hierarchy. For example, each of its ->mynode fields continues to reference the original leaf rcu_node structures, some of which might no longer exist. On the other hand, srcu_for_each_node_breadth_first() traverses to the new node hierarchy. There are at least two bad possible outcomes to this: 1) a) A callback enqueued early on an srcu_data structure (call it *sdp) is recorded pending on sdp->mynode->srcu_data_have_cbs in srcu_funnel_gp_start() with sdp->mynode pointing to a deep leaf (say 3 levels). b) The grace period ends after rcu_init_geometry() shrinks the nodes level to a single one. srcu_gp_end() walks through the new srcu_node hierarchy without ever reaching the old leaves so the callback is never executed. This is easily reproduced on an 8 CPUs machine with CONFIG_NR_CPUS >= 32 and "rcupdate.rcu_self_test=1". The srcu_barrier() after early tests verification never completes and the boot hangs: [ 5413.141029] INFO: task swapper/0:1 blocked for more than 4915 seconds. [ 5413.147564] Not tainted 5.12.0-rc4+ grate-driver#28 [ 5413.151927] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 5413.159753] task:swapper/0 state:D stack: 0 pid: 1 ppid: 0 flags:0x00004000 [ 5413.168099] Call Trace: [ 5413.170555] __schedule+0x36c/0x930 [ 5413.174057] ? wait_for_completion+0x88/0x110 [ 5413.178423] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [ 5413.181575] schedule_timeout+0x284/0x380 [ 5413.185591] ? wait_for_completion+0x88/0x110 [ 5413.189957] ? mark_held_locks+0x61/0x80 [ 5413.193882] ? mark_held_locks+0x61/0x80 [ 5413.197809] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 [ 5413.202173] ? wait_for_completion+0x88/0x110 [ 5413.206535] wait_for_completion+0xb4/0x110 [ 5413.210724] ? srcu_torture_stats_print+0x110/0x110 [ 5413.215610] srcu_barrier+0x187/0x200 [ 5413.219277] ? rcu_tasks_verify_self_tests+0x50/0x50 [ 5413.224244] ? rdinit_setup+0x2b/0x2b [ 5413.227907] rcu_verify_early_boot_tests+0x2d/0x40 [ 5413.232700] do_one_initcall+0x63/0x310 [ 5413.236541] ? rdinit_setup+0x2b/0x2b [ 5413.240207] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x52/0x80 [ 5413.244912] kernel_init_freeable+0x253/0x28f [ 5413.249273] ? rest_init+0x250/0x250 [ 5413.252846] kernel_init+0xa/0x110 [ 5413.256257] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 2) An srcu_struct structure that is initialized before rcu_init_geometry() and used afterward will always have stale rdp->mynode references, resulting in callbacks to be missed in srcu_gp_end(), just like in the previous scenario. This commit therefore causes init_srcu_struct_nodes to initialize the geometry, if needed. This ensures that the srcu_node hierarchy is properly built and distributed from the get-go. Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Cc: Boqun Feng <[email protected]> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]> Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <[email protected]> Cc: Josh Triplett <[email protected]> Cc: Joel Fernandes <[email protected]> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
okias
pushed a commit
to okias/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 30, 2021
cpu_cpu_map holds all the CPUs in the DIE. However in PowerPC, when onlining/offlining of CPUs, this mask doesn't get updated. This mask is however updated when CPUs are added/removed. So when both operations like online/offline of CPUs and adding/removing of CPUs are done simultaneously, then cpumaps end up broken. WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 1142 at kernel/sched/topology.c:898 build_sched_domains+0xd48/0x1720 Modules linked in: rpadlpar_io rpaphp mptcp_diag xsk_diag tcp_diag udp_diag raw_diag inet_diag unix_diag af_packet_diag netlink_diag bonding tls nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject nft_ct nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_set rfkill nf_tables nfnetlink pseries_rng xts vmx_crypto uio_pdrv_genirq uio binfmt_misc ip_tables xfs libcrc32c dm_service_time sd_mod t10_pi sg ibmvfc scsi_transport_fc ibmveth dm_multipath dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod fuse CPU: 13 PID: 1142 Comm: kworker/13:2 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc6+ grate-driver#28 Workqueue: events cpuset_hotplug_workfn NIP: c0000000001caac8 LR: c0000000001caac4 CTR: 00000000007088ec REGS: c00000005596f220 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (5.13.0-rc6+) MSR: 8000000000029033 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 48828222 XER: 00000009 CFAR: c0000000001ea698 IRQMASK: 0 GPR00: c0000000001caac4 c00000005596f4c0 c000000001c4a400 0000000000000036 GPR04: 00000000fffdffff c00000005596f1d0 0000000000000027 c0000018cfd07f90 GPR08: 0000000000000023 0000000000000001 0000000000000027 c0000018fe68ffe8 GPR12: 0000000000008000 c00000001e9d1880 c00000013a047200 0000000000000800 GPR16: c000000001d3c7d0 0000000000000240 0000000000000048 c000000010aacd18 GPR20: 0000000000000001 c000000010aacc18 c00000013a047c00 c000000139ec2400 GPR24: 0000000000000280 c000000139ec2520 c000000136c1b400 c000000001c93060 GPR28: c00000013a047c20 c000000001d3c6c0 c000000001c978a0 000000000000000d NIP [c0000000001caac8] build_sched_domains+0xd48/0x1720 LR [c0000000001caac4] build_sched_domains+0xd44/0x1720 Call Trace: [c00000005596f4c0] [c0000000001caac4] build_sched_domains+0xd44/0x1720 (unreliable) [c00000005596f670] [c0000000001cc5ec] partition_sched_domains_locked+0x3ac/0x4b0 [c00000005596f710] [c0000000002804e4] rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x404/0x9e0 [c00000005596f810] [c000000000283e60] rebuild_sched_domains+0x40/0x70 [c00000005596f840] [c000000000284124] cpuset_hotplug_workfn+0x294/0xf10 [c00000005596fc60] [c000000000175040] process_one_work+0x290/0x590 [c00000005596fd00] [c0000000001753c8] worker_thread+0x88/0x620 [c00000005596fda0] [c000000000181704] kthread+0x194/0x1a0 [c00000005596fe10] [c00000000000ccec] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x70 Instruction dump: 485af049 60000000 2fa30800 409e0028 80fe0000 e89a00f8 e86100e8 38da0120 7f88e378 7ce53b78 4801fb91 60000000 <0fe00000> 39000000 38e00000 38c00000 Fix this by updating cpu_cpu_map aka cpumask_of_node() on every CPU online/offline. Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
So I just wanted to give the recent changes a try but compilation of device trees fails with |
|
This is a python error. I haven't encountered that problem, apparently it should come from some build script. Need more context. |
digetx
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2021
The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus: # test_progs -t perf_buffer test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec skipping offline CPU #24 skipping offline CPU #25 skipping offline CPU #26 skipping offline CPU #27 skipping offline CPU #28 skipping offline CPU #29 skipping offline CPU #30 skipping offline CPU #31 test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:FAIL:buf_cnt got 24, expected 32 Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Changing the test to check online cpus instead of possible. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It works on my device at least…