docs: 3453/helm env updates

[hajjimo]

Addresses #3453

Map Helm variable names to the updated Helm chart in https://github.com/interledger/charts/tree/main/charts/rafiki/values.yaml

Required

• Used LinkOut component on external links
• Reviewed Vale errors and made changes where appropriate
• Ran Prettier
• Previewed updates in Netlify
• Received SME and/or peer approval if updates are significant
• Included a "fixes #" comment

Conditional

• Ensured sequence diagrams follow our style guide
• Included code samples where appropriate
• Updated related READMEs

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for brilliant-pasca-3e80ec ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	3391fdc
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/brilliant-pasca-3e80ec/deploys/68dfb764b1a84e0008e89600
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-3679--brilliant-pasca-3e80ec.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[github-actions]

🚀 Performance Test Results

Test Configuration:

• VUs: 4
• Duration: 1m0s

Test Metrics:

• Requests/s: 38.26
• Iterations/s: 12.78
• Failed Requests: 0.00% (0 of 2302)

📜 Logs

> [email protected] run-tests:testenv /home/runner/work/rafiki/rafiki/test/performance
> ./scripts/run-tests.sh -e test "-k" "-q" "--vus" "4" "--duration" "1m"

Cloud Nine GraphQL API is up: http://localhost:3101/graphql
Cloud Nine Wallet Address is up: http://localhost:3100/
Happy Life Bank Address is up: http://localhost:4100/
cloud-nine-wallet-test-backend already set
cloud-nine-wallet-test-auth already set
happy-life-bank-test-backend already set
happy-life-bank-test-auth already set
     data_received..................: 831 kB 14 kB/s
     data_sent......................: 1.8 MB 29 kB/s
     http_req_blocked...............: avg=8.07µs   min=2.28µs   med=5.74µs  max=1.15ms   p(90)=7.02µs   p(95)=7.7µs   
     http_req_connecting............: avg=1.6µs    min=0s       med=0s      max=1.09ms   p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      
     http_req_duration..............: avg=103.9ms  min=11.1ms   med=82.95ms max=579.14ms p(90)=183.48ms p(95)=206.54ms
       { expected_response:true }...: avg=103.9ms  min=11.1ms   med=82.95ms max=579.14ms p(90)=183.48ms p(95)=206.54ms
     http_req_failed................: 0.00%  ✓ 0         ✗ 2302
     http_req_receiving.............: avg=105.06µs min=28.08µs  med=90.06µs max=2.83ms   p(90)=132.43µs p(95)=166.02µs
     http_req_sending...............: avg=39.4µs   min=10.48µs  med=30.3µs  max=1.81ms   p(90)=43.67µs  p(95)=60.58µs 
     http_req_tls_handshaking.......: avg=0s       min=0s       med=0s      max=0s       p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      
     http_req_waiting...............: avg=103.76ms min=10.84ms  med=82.83ms max=578.92ms p(90)=183.23ms p(95)=206.23ms
     http_reqs......................: 2302   38.262852/s
     iteration_duration.............: avg=312.73ms min=195.55ms med=301.7ms max=1.14s    p(90)=376.02ms p(95)=443.17ms
     iterations.....................: 769    12.781987/s
     vus............................: 4      min=4       max=4 
     vus_max........................: 4      min=4       max=4 

[melissahenderson]

I can't speak to the veracity, but otherwise it looks good :)

I did want to call out that you changed some tables to list the variables in alphabetical order, while others stayed the way they are. You can leave them as is, but I wanted to point that out in case alphabetizing all of them was your intent.