Skip to content

Order of columns during copy_to #2493

@odow

Description

@odow

@mlubin and I have been discussing the following example:

julia> using JuMP

julia> function main()
           model = Model()
           @variable(model, x)
           @variable(model, y >= 0)
           @objective(model, Min, x + y)
           write_to_file(model, "file.mps")
           print(read("file.mps", String))
       end
main (generic function with 1 method)

julia> main()
NAME
ROWS
 N  OBJ
COLUMNS
    y         OBJ       1
    x         OBJ       1
RHS
RANGES
BOUNDS
 LO bounds    y         0
 PL bounds    y
 FR bounds    x
ENDATA

In JuMP, the columns are ordered x, y, but the MPS file, they are ordered as y, x.

Since the behavior of MIP solvers can depend on the column (and row) ordering, this can be undesirable.

The problem is:

"""
_try_constrain_variables_on_creation(
dest::MOI.ModelLike,
src::MOI.ModelLike,
index_map::IndexMap,
::Type{S},
) where {S<:MOI.AbstractScalarSet}
Copy the constraints of type `MOI.VariableIndex`-in-`S` from the model `src` to
the model `dest` and fill `index_map` accordingly. The copy is only done when the
variables to be copied are not already keys of `index_map`.
It returns a list of the constraints that were not added.
"""
function _try_constrain_variables_on_creation(
dest::MOI.ModelLike,
src::MOI.ModelLike,
index_map::IndexMap,
::Type{S},
) where {S<:MOI.AbstractScalarSet}
not_added = MOI.ConstraintIndex{MOI.VariableIndex,S}[]
for ci_src in
MOI.get(src, MOI.ListOfConstraintIndices{MOI.VariableIndex,S}())
f_src = MOI.get(src, MOI.ConstraintFunction(), ci_src)
if haskey(index_map, f_src)
# Can't add it because it contains a variable previously added
push!(not_added, ci_src)
else
set = MOI.get(src, MOI.ConstraintSet(), ci_src)::S
vi_dest, ci_dest = MOI.add_constrained_variable(dest, set)
index_map[ci_src] = ci_dest
index_map[f_src] = vi_dest
end
end
return not_added
end

else
Any[
_try_constrain_variables_on_creation(dest, src, index_map, S)
for S in sorted_variable_sets_by_cost(dest, src)
]

which eagerly tries to constrain variables on creation based on their set type.

I wonder if we should:

  1. not do this for scalar variables; or
  2. use a better heuristic, that adds variables in the correct order, but puts them in a set iff they are consecutive in the VectorOfVariables function.

The original motivation for doing this is so that variable bridges can be preferentially used.

I don't really have an answer yet. I'll explore some stuff and report here.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions