MOI 1.0

[joaquimg]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #159 (58c1e44) into master (a9bc4e0) will increase coverage by 1.09%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 58c1e44 differs from pull request most recent head fe005cf. Consider uploading reports for the commit fe005cf to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #159      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   54.46%   55.55%   +1.09%     
==========================================
  Files           9        9              
  Lines        4030     4156     +126     
==========================================
+ Hits         2195     2309     +114     
- Misses       1835     1847      +12     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/Xpress.jl	85.71% <0.00%> (-14.29%)	⬇️
src/license.jl	65.95% <0.00%> (-3.61%)	⬇️
src/MOI/MOI_wrapper.jl	86.81% <0.00%> (+0.11%)	⬆️
src/MOI/MOI_callbacks.jl	86.48% <0.00%> (+0.37%)	⬆️
src/helper.jl	42.23% <0.00%> (+1.09%)	⬆️
src/api.jl	24.46% <0.00%> (+1.15%)	⬆️
src/xprs_callbacks.jl	62.74% <0.00%> (+2.32%)	⬆️
src/lib.jl	15.63% <0.00%> (+3.46%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a9bc4e0...fe005cf. Read the comment docs.

[joaquimg]

@odow I noted you still want to do "things" in gurobi em cplex. Should we consider some "things" for xpress?

[odow]

Gurobi and CPLEX still have excluded tests, like the infeasibility certificate stuff. And they're missing a copy-to thing. I also don't know if we should tag a 1.0 without official support. (It's an incentive. Hey, your software is still in beta)

[joaquimg]

I would be fine not tagging this as 1.0