bpf, sockmap: Add sk_rmem_alloc check for tcp_bpf_ingress() #170
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Author
|
Master branch: 6091197 |
Author
|
Master branch: 63cc8e2 |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/624575=>bpf-next
branch
from
deb941d to
34115f6
Compare
Author
|
Master branch: 63cc8e2 |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/624575=>bpf-next
branch
from
34115f6 to
374e577
Compare
Author
|
Master branch: 08063b4 |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/624575=>bpf-next
branch
from
374e577 to
5a78536
Compare
Author
|
Master branch: 9492450 |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/624575=>bpf-next
branch
from
5a78536 to
e25e90d
Compare
Author
|
Master branch: a8fee96 |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/624575=>bpf-next
branch
from
e25e90d to
cafcde7
Compare
Author
|
Master branch: 46e9244 |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/624575=>bpf-next
branch
from
cafcde7 to
a320bf1
Compare
Author
|
Master branch: ef07860 |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/624575=>bpf-next
branch
from
a320bf1 to
1403644
Compare
Author
|
Master branch: 7ada378 |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/624575=>bpf-next
branch
from
1403644 to
ca095ec
Compare
Author
|
Master branch: ec80906 |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/624575=>bpf-next
branch
from
ca095ec to
9d7cce9
Compare
Author
|
Master branch: f709869 |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/624575=>bpf-next
branch
from
9d7cce9 to
59bcf0d
Compare
Author
|
Master branch: d0f325c |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/624575=>bpf-next
branch
from
59bcf0d to
83f121d
Compare
Author
|
Master branch: d8dc09a |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/624575=>bpf-next
branch
from
83f121d to
bc9e18c
Compare
Author
|
Master branch: d56c9fe |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/624575=>bpf-next
branch
from
bc9e18c to
631a105
Compare
Author
|
Master branch: e52b8f5 |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/624575=>bpf-next
branch
from
5469819 to
22fe71a
Compare
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
bpf-next
branch
from
e52b8f5 to
7f0059b
Compare
Author
|
Master branch: 7f0059b |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/624575=>bpf-next
branch
from
22fe71a to
0d20a65
Compare
Author
|
Master branch: 7f0059b |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/624575=>bpf-next
branch
from
0d20a65 to
d9d6257
Compare
Author
|
Master branch: 2af7e56 |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/624575=>bpf-next
branch
from
d9d6257 to
ca96733
Compare
We use sk_msg to redirect with sock hash, like this: skA redirect skB Tx <-----------> Rx And construct a scenario where the packet sending speed is high, the packet receiving speed is slow, so the packets are stacked in the ingress queue on the receiving side. After a period of time, the memory is exhausted and the system ooms. To fix, we add sk_rmem_alloc while sk_msg queued in the ingress queue and subtract sk_rmem_alloc while sk_msg dequeued from the ingress queue and check sk_rmem_alloc at the beginning of bpf_tcp_ingress(). Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <[email protected]>
Author
|
Master branch: 169e777 |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/624575=>bpf-next
branch
from
ca96733 to
8928912
Compare
Author
|
At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=624575 expired. Closing PR. |
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2023
Currently, there are two test cases with same name "ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1", the first one is right, the second one should be ALU64_SMOD_K because its code is BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_K. Before: test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS After: test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2023
Currently, there are two test cases with same name "ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1", the first one is right, the second one should be ALU64_SMOD_K because its code is BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_K. Before: test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS After: test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2023
Currently, there are two test cases with same name "ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1", the first one is right, the second one should be ALU64_SMOD_K because its code is BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_K. Before: test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS After: test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2023
Currently, there are two test cases with same name "ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1", the first one is right, the second one should be ALU64_SMOD_K because its code is BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_K. Before: test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS After: test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2023
Currently, there are two test cases with same name "ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1", the first one is right, the second one should be ALU64_SMOD_K because its code is BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_K. Before: test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS After: test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2023
Currently, there are two test cases with same name "ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1", the first one is right, the second one should be ALU64_SMOD_K because its code is BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_K. Before: test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS After: test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2023
Currently, there are two test cases with same name "ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1", the first one is right, the second one should be ALU64_SMOD_K because its code is BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_K. Before: test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS After: test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2023
Currently, there are two test cases with same name "ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1", the first one is right, the second one should be ALU64_SMOD_K because its code is BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_K. Before: test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS After: test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2023
Currently, there are two test cases with same name "ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1", the first one is right, the second one should be ALU64_SMOD_K because its code is BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_K. Before: test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS After: test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2023
Currently, there are two test cases with same name "ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1", the first one is right, the second one should be ALU64_SMOD_K because its code is BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_K. Before: test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS After: test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2024
Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module exhibits the following failures: test_bpf: #82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 301 PASS test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 555 PASS test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 268 PASS test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 269 PASS test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 460 PASS test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 320 PASS test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 222 PASS test_bpf: #320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 273 PASS test_bpf: #344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported jited:0 432 PASS test_bpf: #345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported jited:0 381 PASS test_bpf: #346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported jited:0 505 PASS test_bpf: #490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1 eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported jited:0 261 PASS test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed] Fix them by adding missing processing. Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2025
A chain/flowtable update with duplicated devices in the same batch is possible. Unfortunately, netdev event path only removes the first device that is found, leaving unregistered the hook of the duplicated device. Check if a duplicated device exists in the transaction batch, bail out with EEXIST in such case. WARNING is hit when unregistering the hook: [49042.221275] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 8425 at net/netfilter/core.c:340 nf_hook_entry_head+0xaa/0x150 [49042.221375] CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 8425 Comm: nft Tainted: G S 6.16.0+ #170 PREEMPT(full) [...] [49042.221382] RIP: 0010:nf_hook_entry_head+0xaa/0x150 Fixes: 78d9f48 ("netfilter: nf_tables: add devices to existing flowtable") Fixes: b9703ed ("netfilter: nf_tables: support for adding new devices to an existing netdev chain") Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull request for series with
subject: bpf, sockmap: Add sk_rmem_alloc check for tcp_bpf_ingress()
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=624575