-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
bpf: mptcp: Support for mptcp_sock and is_mptcp #399
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
is_mptcp is a field from struct tcp_sock used to indicate that the current tcp_sock is part of the MPTCP protocol. In this protocol, a first socket (mptcp_sock) is created with sk_protocol set to IPPROTO_MPTCP (=262) for control purpose but it isn't directly on the wire. This is the role of the subflow (kernel) sockets which are classical tcp_sock with sk_protocol set to IPPROTO_TCP. The only way to differentiate such sockets from plain TCP sockets is the is_mptcp field from tcp_sock. Such an exposure in BPF is thus required to be able to differentiate plain TCP sockets from MPTCP subflow sockets in BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS programs. The choice has been made to silently pass the case when CONFIG_MPTCP is unset by defaulting is_mptcp to 0 in order to make BPF independent of the MPTCP configuration. Another solution is to make the verifier fail in 'bpf_tcp_sock_is_valid_ctx_access' but this will add an additional '#ifdef CONFIG_MPTCP' in the BPF code and a same injected BPF program will not run if MPTCP is not set. An example use-case is provided in https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/tree/scripts/bpf/examples Suggested-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Acked-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Rybowski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
This patch implements a new struct bpf_func_proto, named bpf_skc_to_mptcp_sock_proto. Define a new bpf_id BTF_SOCK_TYPE_MPTCP, and a new helper bpf_skc_to_mptcp_sock(), which invokes another new helper bpf_mptcp_sock_from_subflow() in net/mptcp/bpf.c to get struct mptcp_sock from a given subflow socket. v2: Emit BTF type, add func_id checks in verifier.c and bpf_trace.c, remove build check for CONFIG_BPF_JIT Co-developed-by: Nicolas Rybowski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Rybowski <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
CONFIG_IKCONFIG_PROC is required by BPF selftests, otherwise we get
errors like this:
libbpf: failed to open system Kconfig
libbpf: failed to load object 'kprobe_multi'
libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'kprobe_multi': -22
It's because /proc/config.gz is opened in bpf_object__read_kconfig_file()
in tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c:
file = gzopen("/proc/config.gz", "r");
So this patch enables CONFIG_IKCONFIG and CONFIG_IKCONFIG_PROC in
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config.
Suggested-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
This patch adds a base for MPTCP specific tests. It is currently limited to the is_mptcp field in case of plain TCP connection because there is no easy way to get the subflow sk from a msk in userspace. This implies that we cannot lookup the sk_storage attached to the subflow sk in the sockops program. Acked-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Geliang Tang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Rybowski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
This patch extends the MPTCP test base, to test the new helper bpf_skc_to_mptcp_sock(). Define struct mptcp_sock in bpf_tcp_helpers.h, use bpf_skc_to_mptcp_sock to get the msk socket in progs/mptcp_sock.c and store the infos in socket_storage_map. Get the infos from socket_storage_map in prog_tests/mptcp.c. Add a new function verify_msk() to verify the infos of MPTCP socket, and rename verify_sk() to verify_tsk() to verify TCP socket only. v2: Add CONFIG_MPTCP check for clearer error messages Acked-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
This patch verifies the struct member token of struct mptcp_sock. Add a new function get_msk_token() to parse the msk token from the output of the command 'ip mptcp monitor', and verify it in verify_msk(). Acked-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
This patch verifies another member of struct mptcp_sock, ca_name. Add a new function get_msk_ca_name() to read the sysctl tcp_congestion_control and verify it in verify_msk(). v3: Access the sysctl through the filesystem to avoid compatibility issues with the busybox sysctl command. Acked-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
This patch verifies the 'first' struct member of struct mptcp_sock, which points to the first subflow of msk. Save 'sk' in mptcp_storage, and verify it with 'first' in verify_msk(). Acked-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
|
Master branch: 20b87e7 |
|
At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=637723 expired. Closing PR. |
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2025
Use BPF_TRAMP_F_INDIRECT flag to detect struct ops and emit proper prologue and epilogue for this case. With this patch, all of the struct_ops related testcases (except struct_ops_multi_pages) passed on LoongArch. The testcase struct_ops_multi_pages failed is because the actual image_pages_cnt is 40 which is bigger than MAX_TRAMP_IMAGE_PAGES. Before: $ sudo ./test_progs -t struct_ops -d struct_ops_multi_pages ... WATCHDOG: test case struct_ops_module/struct_ops_load executes for 10 seconds... After: $ sudo ./test_progs -t struct_ops -d struct_ops_multi_pages ... #15 bad_struct_ops:OK ... #399 struct_ops_autocreate:OK ... #400 struct_ops_kptr_return:OK ... #401 struct_ops_maybe_null:OK ... #402 struct_ops_module:OK ... #404 struct_ops_no_cfi:OK ... #405 struct_ops_private_stack:SKIP ... #406 struct_ops_refcounted:OK Summary: 8/25 PASSED, 3 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2025
Use BPF_TRAMP_F_INDIRECT flag to detect struct ops and emit proper prologue and epilogue for this case. With this patch, all of the struct_ops related testcases (except struct_ops_multi_pages) passed on LoongArch. The testcase struct_ops_multi_pages failed is because the actual image_pages_cnt is 40 which is bigger than MAX_TRAMP_IMAGE_PAGES. Before: $ sudo ./test_progs -t struct_ops -d struct_ops_multi_pages ... WATCHDOG: test case struct_ops_module/struct_ops_load executes for 10 seconds... After: $ sudo ./test_progs -t struct_ops -d struct_ops_multi_pages ... #15 bad_struct_ops:OK ... #399 struct_ops_autocreate:OK ... #400 struct_ops_kptr_return:OK ... #401 struct_ops_maybe_null:OK ... #402 struct_ops_module:OK ... #404 struct_ops_no_cfi:OK ... #405 struct_ops_private_stack:SKIP ... #406 struct_ops_refcounted:OK Summary: 8/25 PASSED, 3 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2025
Use BPF_TRAMP_F_INDIRECT flag to detect struct ops and emit proper prologue and epilogue for this case. With this patch, all of the struct_ops related testcases (except struct_ops_multi_pages) passed on LoongArch. The testcase struct_ops_multi_pages failed is because the actual image_pages_cnt is 40 which is bigger than MAX_TRAMP_IMAGE_PAGES. Before: $ sudo ./test_progs -t struct_ops -d struct_ops_multi_pages ... WATCHDOG: test case struct_ops_module/struct_ops_load executes for 10 seconds... After: $ sudo ./test_progs -t struct_ops -d struct_ops_multi_pages ... #15 bad_struct_ops:OK ... #399 struct_ops_autocreate:OK ... #400 struct_ops_kptr_return:OK ... #401 struct_ops_maybe_null:OK ... #402 struct_ops_module:OK ... #404 struct_ops_no_cfi:OK ... #405 struct_ops_private_stack:SKIP ... #406 struct_ops_refcounted:OK Summary: 8/25 PASSED, 3 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2025
Use BPF_TRAMP_F_INDIRECT flag to detect struct ops and emit proper prologue and epilogue for this case. With this patch, all of the struct_ops related testcases (except struct_ops_multi_pages) passed on LoongArch. The testcase struct_ops_multi_pages failed is because the actual image_pages_cnt is 40 which is bigger than MAX_TRAMP_IMAGE_PAGES. Before: $ sudo ./test_progs -t struct_ops -d struct_ops_multi_pages ... WATCHDOG: test case struct_ops_module/struct_ops_load executes for 10 seconds... After: $ sudo ./test_progs -t struct_ops -d struct_ops_multi_pages ... #15 bad_struct_ops:OK ... #399 struct_ops_autocreate:OK ... #400 struct_ops_kptr_return:OK ... #401 struct_ops_maybe_null:OK ... #402 struct_ops_module:OK ... #404 struct_ops_no_cfi:OK ... #405 struct_ops_private_stack:SKIP ... #406 struct_ops_refcounted:OK Summary: 8/25 PASSED, 3 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2025
Use BPF_TRAMP_F_INDIRECT flag to detect struct ops and emit proper prologue and epilogue for this case. With this patch, all of the struct_ops related testcases (except struct_ops_multi_pages) passed on LoongArch. The testcase struct_ops_multi_pages failed is because the actual image_pages_cnt is 40 which is bigger than MAX_TRAMP_IMAGE_PAGES. Before: $ sudo ./test_progs -t struct_ops -d struct_ops_multi_pages ... WATCHDOG: test case struct_ops_module/struct_ops_load executes for 10 seconds... After: $ sudo ./test_progs -t struct_ops -d struct_ops_multi_pages ... #15 bad_struct_ops:OK ... #399 struct_ops_autocreate:OK ... #400 struct_ops_kptr_return:OK ... #401 struct_ops_maybe_null:OK ... #402 struct_ops_module:OK ... #404 struct_ops_no_cfi:OK ... #405 struct_ops_private_stack:SKIP ... #406 struct_ops_refcounted:OK Summary: 8/25 PASSED, 3 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2025
Use BPF_TRAMP_F_INDIRECT flag to detect struct ops and emit proper prologue and epilogue for this case. With this patch, all of the struct_ops related testcases (except struct_ops_multi_pages) passed on LoongArch. The testcase struct_ops_multi_pages failed is because the actual image_pages_cnt is 40 which is bigger than MAX_TRAMP_IMAGE_PAGES. Before: $ sudo ./test_progs -t struct_ops -d struct_ops_multi_pages ... WATCHDOG: test case struct_ops_module/struct_ops_load executes for 10 seconds... After: $ sudo ./test_progs -t struct_ops -d struct_ops_multi_pages ... #15 bad_struct_ops:OK ... #399 struct_ops_autocreate:OK ... #400 struct_ops_kptr_return:OK ... #401 struct_ops_maybe_null:OK ... #402 struct_ops_module:OK ... #404 struct_ops_no_cfi:OK ... #405 struct_ops_private_stack:SKIP ... #406 struct_ops_refcounted:OK Summary: 8/25 PASSED, 3 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 9, 2025
Use BPF_TRAMP_F_INDIRECT flag to detect struct ops and emit proper prologue and epilogue for this case. With this patch, all of the struct_ops related testcases (except struct_ops_multi_pages) passed on LoongArch. The testcase struct_ops_multi_pages failed is because the actual image_pages_cnt is 40 which is bigger than MAX_TRAMP_IMAGE_PAGES. Before: $ sudo ./test_progs -t struct_ops -d struct_ops_multi_pages ... WATCHDOG: test case struct_ops_module/struct_ops_load executes for 10 seconds... After: $ sudo ./test_progs -t struct_ops -d struct_ops_multi_pages ... #15 bad_struct_ops:OK ... #399 struct_ops_autocreate:OK ... #400 struct_ops_kptr_return:OK ... #401 struct_ops_maybe_null:OK ... #402 struct_ops_module:OK ... #404 struct_ops_no_cfi:OK ... #405 struct_ops_private_stack:SKIP ... #406 struct_ops_refcounted:OK Summary: 8/25 PASSED, 3 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull request for series with
subject: bpf: mptcp: Support for mptcp_sock and is_mptcp
version: 3
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=637723