-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
Description
This issue started out as a proposal to make the "implicit default route for IPv4 autoconf" to be configurable, but CCB decided to remove this implicit route completely. Motivation: It can be added by explicitly by those who want it.
The description below describes the original idea.
Description
It would be good to be able to disable the implicit default route which Infix currently sets up on interfaces with IPv4 autoconfiguration.
Perhaps by an additional no default-route
setting in the autoconf context
admin@infix-00-00-00:/config/interface/e1/ipv4/autoconf/> help
enabled Use a ZeroConf/IPv4LL agent to retrieve an 169.254/16 address.
request-address Try to acquire the specified IP address, if available.
admin@infix-00-00-00:/config/interface/e1/ipv4/autoconf/>
Motivation
When configuring IPv4 autoconfiguration (169.254.x.x/16, also known as zeroconf) for an interface, Infix implicitly adds a default route through that interface. This default route has lowest possible routing PREFerence (254), so any default route learnt elsewhere will override.
The purpose of this default route is to facilitate easy setup with autoconf, even on links where there are units with only routeable addresses. See man page of avahi-autoipd for the following motivation/example of added default route
To allow communication between hosts that have only an IPv4LL address assigned and hosts that only
have a routable IP address assigned you may add the following routes to both network configurations:
route add -net 169.254.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 dev eth0 metric 99
route add default dev eth0 metric 99
Although this implicit default route seems like a good default, it would be good if it can be disabled. In OSPF, you can make a router inject a default route into OSPF, either always
or only when the router itself has an active default route.
The latter is done by set default-route-advertise enabled
in OSPF context, and is good to use to avoid routing to a dead end.
This OSPF use case would be incompatible with use of IPv4 autoconfiguration on the same router, unless we can disable the implicit default route.
Additional Information
A suitable test case would be
- to let router A inject default route into OSPF, while having some interface with IPv4 autoconfig enabled
- to let router B see if it gets a default route via OSPF from router A
Without disabling the implicit default route, B would get a default route from A via OSPF.
If A disables the implicit default route, it will no longer advertise it and B would not get a default route.
General Information
Anyone can help out by sponsoring development of new features or contributing pull requests.
Please use this issue for discussions related to the feature.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Type
Projects
Status