Skip to content

Conversation

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer commented Oct 27, 2025

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer [email protected]

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Part of #12291

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels Oct 27, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 27, 2025
@sbueringer sbueringer changed the title ✨ KCP: implement trigger in-place update [WIP] ✨ KCP: implement trigger in-place update Oct 27, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 27, 2025
@sbueringer sbueringer added the area/provider/control-plane-kubeadm Issues or PRs related to KCP label Oct 27, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label label Oct 27, 2025
@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-kcp-trigger-in-place branch from 07b1d8f to 68408cd Compare October 27, 2025 13:30
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-kcp-trigger-in-place branch 4 times, most recently from a9146fd to 8d46ae0 Compare October 27, 2025 14:42
@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-kcp-trigger-in-place branch from 8d46ae0 to ea9da88 Compare October 27, 2025 15:58
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 27, 2025
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

@sbueringer sbueringer changed the title [WIP] ✨ KCP: implement trigger in-place update ✨ KCP: implement trigger in-place update Oct 27, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 27, 2025
Copy link
Member

@furkatgofurov7 furkatgofurov7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mostly suggestions for code improvement, great work otherwise!

Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, great work in transition KCP from the original state to where we will be at the end of this PR!

@sbueringer sbueringer added the tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. label Oct 28, 2025
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

@fabriziopandini @furkatgofurov7 Thx for the reviews

Findings should be all addressed now, PTAL :)

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 28, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: cd310783a4e0b08e5ce2795ba6a291c81a6286de

Copy link
Member

@furkatgofurov7 furkatgofurov7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work!

/lgtm

@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

/approve
yay!

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 28, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit f63f444 into kubernetes-sigs:main Oct 28, 2025
19 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.12 milestone Oct 28, 2025
@sbueringer sbueringer deleted the pr-kcp-trigger-in-place branch October 28, 2025 16:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/provider/control-plane-kubeadm Issues or PRs related to KCP cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants