- 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 44
 
apis: conformance: add traffic distribution and internal traffic policies fields #131
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
apis: conformance: add traffic distribution and internal traffic policies fields #131
Conversation
| 
           [APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: MrFreezeex The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. 
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
 
      Approvers can indicate their approval by writing   | 
    
0dada84    to
    0afcfec      
    Compare
  
    | 
           /sig multicluster  | 
    
0afcfec    to
    5b86030      
    Compare
  
    | 
               | 
          ||
| Context("", func() { | ||
| BeforeEach(func() { | ||
| t.helloService.Spec.TrafficDistribution = ptr.To(corev1.ServiceTrafficDistributionPreferClose) | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As a heads up, this API is in a bit of flux for Service, see KEP-3015 and kubernetes/kubernetes#130844
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be fine no? It's already graduating to stable in kube 1.35 and was already beta/enabled by default in kube 1.34.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is graduating, but also being replaced by PreferSameZone and PreferSameNode is being added for more explicit semantics.
| 
           Triage note: 
  | 
    
Signed-off-by: Arthur Outhenin-Chalandre <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arthur Outhenin-Chalandre <[email protected]>
5b86030    to
    aa9f56f      
    Compare
  
    Signed-off-by: Arthur Outhenin-Chalandre <[email protected]>
Related KEP PR: kubernetes/enhancements#5588