-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
fix get assets #17385
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
fix get assets #17385
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We were skipping tasks in `kops get assets`; but this meant we would not discover assets for skipped tasks. We are doing a dry-run here, so introduce a dry-run mode that does not look for existing resources. That is essentially as fast as skipping the task, but means we visit all tasks.
Member
|
/retest |
hakman
approved these changes
May 3, 2025
Contributor
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hakman The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
This was referenced May 3, 2025
Closed
k8s-ci-robot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 3, 2025
…-upstream-release-1.32 Automated cherry pick of #17385: tests: add tests for kubectl get assets
k8s-ci-robot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 3, 2025
…-upstream-release-1.31 Automated cherry pick of #17385: tests: add tests for kubectl get assets
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
approved
Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.
area/provider/aws
Issues or PRs related to aws provider
area/provider/gcp
Issues or PRs related to gcp provider
cncf-cla: yes
Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA.
lgtm
"Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
size/L
Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
tests: add tests for kubectl get assets
fix kops get cluster for files
We were skipping tasks in
kops get assets; but thismeant we would not discover assets for skipped tasks.
We are doing a dry-run here, so introduce a dry-run mode that
does not look for existing resources. That is essentially as fast
as skipping the task, but means we visit all tasks.