EasyCLA Feedback & Issues

[mrbobbytables]

This issue will be used to collect feedback and issues encountered by the Community during the EasyCLA rollout.

Please post issues encountered here with as much supporting information as possible (screenshots etc).

---

/area github-integration

[MadhavJivrajani]

/cc @anusha94
fyi since you were working on adding support to the cla plugin in prow :)

[uablrek]

I have a signed CLA since 2018 (I think), now I get;

[reylejano]

This came up on the k/website Official 1.23 Release Docs PR we use to merge PRs from the k/website dev-1.23 branch into k/website main

[Huang-Wei]

I've signed CLA since mid-2018, but got this error on EasyCLA today:

kubernetes-sigs/scheduler-plugins#290 (comment)

---

Updated: My company's CLA approver approved my easyCLA request, and the above CR shows green. However, another PR doesn't, even I tried the "Not Covered" button for a few times.

[olemarkus]

I am covered by a corporate CLA, but I am getting this error kubernetes/kops#12743 (comment)

[wangchen615]

I am also covered by a corporate CLA, but I am getting this error for kubernetes/autoscaler#4131 (comment)

[dims]

one more kubernetes/kubernetes#106436

[bradtopol]

@mrbobbytables It appears there was no automatic migration of existing folks who had approval. I am having to manually add each person to the new easyCLA access list. For all IBM employees that are running into this issue please contact me on our internal slack and I will add you to the easyCLA.
@mrbobbytables if there is an easier way for me to handle this please let me know. Thanks!

[mrbobbytables]

@bradtopol For now, don't worry about adding them 1-by-1, its non-blocking and they can ignore it til the issues are sorted out.

[dims]

@pranab-bajpai is there working going on to fix this? I'd like to follow along, looks like slack channel is totally silent and no updates from the easycla team on this issue either. Could we please work in the open?

cc @caniszczyk

[bradtopol]

@bradtopol For now, don't worry about adding them 1-by-1, its non-blocking and they can ignore it til the issues are sorted out.

Really? Folks keep telling me its blocking their PRs.

[mrbobbytables]

@bradtopol yup. It's been rolled out in non-blocking mode. The old CLA is still the source of truth. If they have the label cncf-cla: yes it'll merge.