-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
Add SearchResult.forEachHit #386
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6a8a2d1
wip
Aschen 1292c73
Add SearchResult.forEachHit
Aschen 5c0aa31
Merge branch '6-dev' into for-each-hit
Aschen 0a79b38
Does not mutate original instance
Aschen 06404f7
Merge branch 'for-each-hit' of github.com:kuzzleio/sdk-javascript int…
Aschen 57703ee
Node.js 6 support
Aschen 3303b76
Merge branch '6-dev' into for-each-hit
Aschen File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why do we need to instantiate a new
SearchResult
object here ?Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
next
method does not return a newSearchResult
but instead it modify his properties.I instantiate a new
SearchResult
to avoid mutating the original one when callingforEachHit
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, the
next
method should return a newSearchResult
instance, as it is done in other SDK, instead of mutating the current object.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, so it's
next
method that should return a new instance.Instead of a complex recursive code with
firstCall
, I'd rather fix thenext
method first.Once done, you will only need to loop into
this.hits
and then callthis.next().forEachHit(actions)