Minor fixes after recent API changes #1

weliveindetail · 2020-09-25T13:46:18Z

LLVM doesn't prefer to work with pull requests. What's your opinion? It could be a pragmatic way for me to contribute.

LLVMOrcError was removed and OrcError.cpp is now part of LLVMOrcShared

…argetProcessControl

lhames · 2020-09-25T18:32:46Z

Great stuff -- thanks Stefan!

lhames · 2020-09-25T18:33:53Z

As for PRs: Lets give them a try. I think I'm going to cherry-pick this stuff back to the mainline by hand so we don't want this branch acquiring too many changes, but a handful seems fine.

This reverts commit 9be8f8b. This breaks tsan on Ubuntu 16.04: $ cat tiny_race.c #include <pthread.h> int Global; void *Thread1(void *x) { Global = 42; return x; } int main() { pthread_t t; pthread_create(&t, NULL, Thread1, NULL); Global = 43; pthread_join(t, NULL); return Global; } $ out/gn/bin/clang -fsanitize=thread -g -O1 tiny_race.c --sysroot ~/src/chrome/src/build/linux/debian_sid_amd64-sysroot/ $ docker run -v $PWD:/foo ubuntu:xenial /foo/a.out FATAL: ThreadSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_platform_linux.cpp:447 "((thr_beg)) >= ((tls_addr))" (0x7fddd76beb80, 0xfffffffffffff980) #0 <null> <null> (a.out+0x4960b6) #1 <null> <null> (a.out+0x4b677f) #2 <null> <null> (a.out+0x49cf94) #3 <null> <null> (a.out+0x499bd2) #4 <null> <null> (a.out+0x42aaf1) swiftlang#5 <null> <null> (libpthread.so.0+0x76b9) swiftlang#6 <null> <null> (libc.so.6+0x1074dc) (Get the sysroot from here: https://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/chrome-linux-sysroot/toolchain/500976182686961e34974ea7bdc0a21fca32be06/debian_sid_amd64_sysroot.tar.xz) Also reverts follow-on commits: This reverts commit 58c62fd. This reverts commit 31e541e.

This adds support for swapping comparison operands when it may introduce new folding opportunities. This is roughly the same as the code added to AArch64ISelLowering in 162435e. For an example of a testcase which exercises this, see llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/swap-compare-operands.ll (Godbolt for that testcase: https://godbolt.org/z/43WEMb) The idea behind this is that sometimes, we may be able to fold away, say, a shift or extend in a compare by swapping its operands. e.g. in the case of this compare: ``` lsl x8, x0, #1 cmp x8, x1 cset w0, lt ``` The following is equivalent: ``` cmp x1, x0, lsl #1 cset w0, gt ``` Most of the code here is just a reimplementation of what already exists in AArch64ISelLowering. (See `getCmpOperandFoldingProfit` and `getAArch64Cmp` for the equivalent code.) Note that most of the AND code in the testcase doesn't actually fold. It seems like we're missing selection support for that sort of fold right now, since SDAG happily folds these away (e.g testSwapCmpWithShiftedZeroExtend8_32 in the original .ll testcase) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89422

…vm#75394) Calling one of pthread join/detach interceptor on an already joined/detached thread causes asserts such as: AddressSanitizer: CHECK failed: sanitizer_thread_arg_retval.cpp:56 "((t)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0) (tid=1236094) #0 0x555555634f8b in __asan::CheckUnwind() compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_rtl.cpp:69:3 #1 0x55555564e06e in __sanitizer::CheckFailed(char const*, int, char const*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long) compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_termination.cpp:86:24 #2 0x5555556491df in __sanitizer::ThreadArgRetval::BeforeJoin(unsigned long) const compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_thread_arg_retval.cpp:56:3 #3 0x5555556198ed in Join<___interceptor_pthread_tryjoin_np(void*, void**)::<lambda()> > compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_thread_arg_retval.h:74:26 #4 0x5555556198ed in pthread_tryjoin_np compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_interceptors.cpp:311:29 The assert are replaced by error codes.

…ext is not fully initialized (llvm#110481) As this comment around target initialization implies: ``` // This can be NULL if we don't know anything about the architecture or if // the target for an architecture isn't enabled in the llvm/clang that we // built ``` There are cases where we might fail to call `InitBuiltinTypes` when creating the backing `ASTContext` for a `TypeSystemClang`. If that happens, the builtins `QualType`s, e.g., `VoidPtrTy`/`IntTy`/etc., are not initialized and dereferencing them as we do in `GetBuiltinTypeForEncodingAndBitSize` (and other places) will lead to nullptr-dereferences. Example backtrace: ``` (lldb) run Assertion failed: (!isNull() && "Cannot retrieve a NULL type pointer"), function getCommonPtr, file Type.h, line 958. Process 2680 stopped * thread swiftlang#15, name = '<lldb.process.internal-state(pid=2712)>', stop reason = hit program assert frame #4: 0x000000010cdf3cdc liblldb.20.0.0git.dylib`DWARFASTParserClang::ExtractIntFromFormValue(lldb_private::CompilerType const&, lldb_private::plugin::dwarf::DWARFFormValue const&) const (.cold.1) + liblldb.20.0.0git.dylib`DWARFASTParserClang::ParseObjCMethod(lldb_private::ObjCLanguage::MethodName const&, lldb_private::plugin::dwarf::DWARFDIE const&, lldb_private::CompilerType, ParsedDWARFTypeAttributes , bool) (.cold.1): -> 0x10cdf3cdc <+0>: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-0x10]! 0x10cdf3ce0 <+4>: mov x29, sp 0x10cdf3ce4 <+8>: adrp x0, 545 0x10cdf3ce8 <+12>: add x0, x0, #0xa25 ; "ParseObjCMethod" Target 0: (lldb) stopped. (lldb) bt * thread swiftlang#15, name = '<lldb.process.internal-state(pid=2712)>', stop reason = hit program assert frame #0: 0x0000000180d08600 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__pthread_kill + 8 frame #1: 0x0000000180d40f50 libsystem_pthread.dylib`pthread_kill + 288 frame #2: 0x0000000180c4d908 libsystem_c.dylib`abort + 128 frame #3: 0x0000000180c4cc1c libsystem_c.dylib`__assert_rtn + 284 * frame #4: 0x000000010cdf3cdc liblldb.20.0.0git.dylib`DWARFASTParserClang::ExtractIntFromFormValue(lldb_private::CompilerType const&, lldb_private::plugin::dwarf::DWARFFormValue const&) const (.cold.1) + frame swiftlang#5: 0x0000000109d30acc liblldb.20.0.0git.dylib`lldb_private::TypeSystemClang::GetBuiltinTypeForEncodingAndBitSize(lldb::Encoding, unsigned long) + 1188 frame swiftlang#6: 0x0000000109aaaed4 liblldb.20.0.0git.dylib`DynamicLoaderMacOS::NotifyBreakpointHit(void*, lldb_private::StoppointCallbackContext*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long) + 384 ``` This patch adds a one-time user-visible warning for when we fail to initialize the AST to indicate that initialization went wrong for the given target. Additionally, we add checks for whether one of the `ASTContext` `QualType`s is invalid before dereferencing any builtin types. The warning would look as follows: ``` (lldb) target create "a.out" Current executable set to 'a.out' (arm64). (lldb) b main warning: Failed to initialize builtin ASTContext types for target 'some-unknown-triple'. Printing variables may behave unexpectedly. Breakpoint 1: where = a.out`main + 8 at stepping.cpp:5:14, address = 0x0000000100003f90 ``` rdar://134869779

When compiling for an SVE target we can use INDEX to generate constant fixed-length step vectors, e.g.: ``` uint32x4_t foo() { return (uint32x4_t){0, 1, 2, 3}; } ``` Currently: ``` foo(): adrp x8, .LCPI1_0 ldr q0, [x8, :lo12:.LCPI1_0] ret ``` With INDEX: ``` foo(): index z0.s, #0, #1 ret ``` The logic for this was already in `LowerBUILD_VECTOR`, though it was hidden under a check for `!Subtarget->isNeonAvailable()`. This patch refactors this to enable the corresponding code path unconditionally for constant step vectors (as long as we can use SVE for them).

…ates explicitly specialized for an implicitly instantiated class template specialization (llvm#113464) Consider the following: ``` template<typename T> struct A { template<typename U> struct B { static constexpr int x = 0; // #1 }; template<typename U> struct B<U*> { static constexpr int x = 1; // #2 }; }; template<> template<typename U> struct A<long>::B { static constexpr int x = 2; // #3 }; static_assert(A<short>::B<int>::y == 0); // uses #1 static_assert(A<short>::B<int*>::y == 1); // uses #2 static_assert(A<long>::B<int>::y == 2); // uses #3 static_assert(A<long>::B<int*>::y == 2); // uses #3 ``` According to [temp.spec.partial.member] p2: > If the primary member template is explicitly specialized for a given (implicit) specialization of the enclosing class template, the partial specializations of the member template are ignored for this specialization of the enclosing class template. If a partial specialization of the member template is explicitly specialized for a given (implicit) specialization of the enclosing class template, the primary member template and its other partial specializations are still considered for this specialization of the enclosing class template. The example above fails to compile because we currently don't implement [temp.spec.partial.member] p2. This patch implements the wording, fixing llvm#51051.

We've found that basic profiling could help improving/optimizing when developing clang-tidy checks. This PR adds an extra command ``` set enable-profile (true|false) Set whether to enable matcher profiling. ``` which enables profiling queries on each file. Sample output: ``` $ cat test.cql set enable-profile true m binaryOperator(isExpansionInMainFile()) $ cat test.c int test(int i, int j) { return i + j; } $ clang-query --track-memory -f test.cql test.c -- Match #1: {{.*}}/test.c:2:10: note: "root" binds here 2 | return i + j; | ^~~~~ 1 match. ===-------------------------------------------------------------------------=== clang-query matcher profiling ===-------------------------------------------------------------------------=== Total Execution Time: 0.0000 seconds (0.0000 wall clock) ---User Time--- --System Time-- --User+System-- ---Wall Time--- ---Mem--- --- Name --- 0.0000 (100.0%) 0.0000 (100.0%) 0.0000 (100.0%) 0.0000 (100.0%) 224 {{.*}}/test.c 0.0000 (100.0%) 0.0000 (100.0%) 0.0000 (100.0%) 0.0000 (100.0%) 224 Total ```

llvm#115376) …15019)" This reverts commit 9f79615. This is breaking compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/... Author knows about the breakage.

## Description This PR fixes a segmentation fault that occurs when passing options requiring arguments via `-Xopenmp-target=<triple>`. The issue was that the function `Driver::getOffloadArchs` did not properly parse the extracted option, but instead assumed it was valid, leading to a crash when incomplete arguments were provided. ## Backtrace ```sh llvm-project/build/bin/clang++ main.cpp -fopenmp=libomp -fopenmp-targets=powerpc64le-ibm-linux-gnu -Xopenmp-target=powerpc64le-ibm-linux-gnu -o PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: llvm-project/build/bin/clang++ main.cpp -fopenmp=libomp -fopenmp-targets=powerpc64le-ibm-linux-gnu -Xopenmp-target=powerpc64le-ibm-linux-gnu -o 1. Compilation construction 2. Building compilation actions #0 0x0000562fb21c363b llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x392f63b) #1 0x0000562fb21c0e3c SignalHandler(int) Signals.cpp:0:0 #2 0x00007fcbf6c81420 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x14420) #3 0x0000562fb1fa5d70 llvm::opt::Option::matches(llvm::opt::OptSpecifier) const (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x3711d70) #4 0x0000562fb2a78e7d clang::driver::Driver::getOffloadArchs(clang::driver::Compilation&, llvm::opt::DerivedArgList const&, clang::driver::Action::OffloadKind, clang::driver::ToolChain const*, bool) const (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x41e4e7d) swiftlang#5 0x0000562fb2a7a9aa clang::driver::Driver::BuildOffloadingActions(clang::driver::Compilation&, llvm::opt::DerivedArgList&, std::pair<clang::driver::types::ID, llvm::opt::Arg const*> const&, clang::driver::Action*) const (.part.1164) Driver.cpp:0:0 swiftlang#6 0x0000562fb2a7c093 clang::driver::Driver::BuildActions(clang::driver::Compilation&, llvm::opt::DerivedArgList&, llvm::SmallVector<std::pair<clang::driver::types::ID, llvm::opt::Arg const*>, 16u> const&, llvm::SmallVector<clang::driver::Action*, 3u>&) const (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x41e8093) swiftlang#7 0x0000562fb2a8395d clang::driver::Driver::BuildCompilation(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>) (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x41ef95d) swiftlang#8 0x0000562faf92684c clang_main(int, char**, llvm::ToolContext const&) (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x109284c) swiftlang#9 0x0000562faf826cc6 main (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0xf92cc6) swiftlang#10 0x00007fcbf6699083 __libc_start_main /build/glibc-LcI20x/glibc-2.31/csu/../csu/libc-start.c:342:3 swiftlang#11 0x0000562faf923a5e _start (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x108fa5e) [1] 2628042 segmentation fault (core dumped) main.cpp -fopenmp=libomp -fopenmp-targets=powerpc64le-ibm-linux-gnu -o ```

llvm#118923) …d reentry. These utilities provide new, more generic and easier to use support for lazy compilation in ORC. LazyReexportsManager is an alternative to LazyCallThroughManager. It takes requests for lazy re-entry points in the form of an alias map: lazy-reexports = { ( <entry point symbol #1>, <implementation symbol #1> ), ( <entry point symbol #2>, <implementation symbol #2> ), ... ( <entry point symbol #n>, <implementation symbol #n> ) } LazyReexportsManager then: 1. binds the entry points to the implementation names in an internal table. 2. creates a JIT re-entry trampoline for each entry point. 3. creates a redirectable symbol for each of the entry point name and binds redirectable symbol to the corresponding reentry trampoline. When an entry point symbol is first called at runtime (which may be on any thread of the JIT'd program) it will re-enter the JIT via the trampoline and trigger a lookup for the implementation symbol stored in LazyReexportsManager's internal table. When the lookup completes the entry point symbol will be updated (via the RedirectableSymbolManager) to point at the implementation symbol, and execution will proceed to the implementation symbol. Actual construction of the re-entry trampolines and redirectable symbols is delegated to an EmitTrampolines functor and the RedirectableSymbolsManager respectively. JITLinkReentryTrampolines.h provides a JITLink-based implementation of the EmitTrampolines functor. (AArch64 only in this patch, but other architectures will be added in the near future). Register state save and reentry functionality is added to the ORC runtime in the __orc_rt_sysv_resolve and __orc_rt_resolve_implementation functions (the latter is generic, the former will need custom implementations for each ABI and architecture to be supported, however this should be much less effort than the existing OrcABISupport approach, since the ORC runtime allows this code to be written as native assembly). The resulting system: 1. Works equally well for in-process and out-of-process JIT'd code. 2. Requires less boilerplate to set up. Given an ObjectLinkingLayer and PlatformJD (JITDylib containing the ORC runtime), setup is just: ```c++ auto RSMgr = JITLinkRedirectableSymbolManager::Create(OLL); if (!RSMgr) return RSMgr.takeError(); auto LRMgr = createJITLinkLazyReexportsManager(OLL, **RSMgr, PlatformJD); if (!LRMgr) return LRMgr.takeError(); ``` after which lazy reexports can be introduced with: ```c++ JD.define(lazyReexports(LRMgr, <alias map>)); ``` LazyObectLinkingLayer is updated to use this new method, but the LLVM-IR level CompileOnDemandLayer will continue to use LazyCallThroughManager and OrcABISupport until the new system supports a wider range of architectures and ABIs. The llvm-jitlink utility's -lazy option now uses the new scheme. Since it depends on the ORC runtime, the lazy-link.ll testcase and associated helpers are moved to the ORC runtime.

According to the documentation described at https://github.com/loongson/la-abi-specs/blob/release/ladwarf.adoc, the dwarf numbers for floating-point registers range from 32 to 63. An incorrect dwarf number will prevent the register values from being properly restored during unwinding. This test reflects this problem: ``` loongson@linux:~$ cat test.c void foo() { asm volatile ("movgr2fr.d $fs2, $ra":::"$fs2"); } int main() { asm volatile ("movgr2fr.d $fs2, $sp":::"$fs2"); foo(); return 0; } loongson@linux:~$ clang -g test.c -o test ``` Without this patch: ``` loongson@linux:~$ ./_build/bin/lldb ./t (lldb) target create "./t" Current executable set to '/home/loongson/llvm-project/_build_lldb/t' (loongarch64). (lldb) b foo Breakpoint 1: where = t`foo + 20 at test.c:4:1, address = 0x0000000000000714 (lldb) r Process 2455626 launched: '/home/loongson/llvm-project/_build_lldb/t' (loongarch64) Process 2455626 stopped * thread #1, name = 't', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x0000555555554714 t`foo at test.c:4:1 1 #include <stdio.h> 2 3 void foo() { -> 4 asm volatile ("movgr2fr.d $fs2, $ra":::"$fs2"); 5 } 6 int main() { 7 asm volatile ("movgr2fr.d $fs2, $sp":::"$fs2"); (lldb) si Process 2455626 stopped * thread #1, name = 't', stop reason = instruction step into frame #0: 0x0000555555554718 t`foo at test.c:4:1 1 #include <stdio.h> 2 3 void foo() { -> 4 asm volatile ("movgr2fr.d $fs2, $ra":::"$fs2"); 5 } 6 int main() { 7 asm volatile ("movgr2fr.d $fs2, $sp":::"$fs2"); (lldb) f 1 frame #1: 0x0000555555554768 t`main at test.c:8:1 5 } 6 int main() { 7 asm volatile ("movgr2fr.d $fs2, $sp":::"$fs2"); -> 8 foo(); 9 return 0; 10 } (lldb) register read -a General Purpose Registers: r1 = 0x0000555555554768 t`main + 40 at test.c:8:1 r3 = 0x00007ffffffef780 r22 = 0x00007ffffffef7b0 r23 = 0x00007ffffffef918 r24 = 0x0000000000000001 r25 = 0x0000000000000000 r26 = 0x000055555555be08 t`__do_global_dtors_aux_fini_array_entry r27 = 0x0000555555554740 t`main at test.c:6 r28 = 0x00007ffffffef928 r29 = 0x00007ffff7febc88 ld-linux-loongarch-lp64d.so.1`_rtld_global_ro r30 = 0x000055555555be08 t`__do_global_dtors_aux_fini_array_entry pc = 0x0000555555554768 t`main + 40 at test.c:8:1 33 registers were unavailable. Floating Point Registers: f13 = 0x00007ffffffef780 !!!!! wrong register f24 = 0xffffffffffffffff f25 = 0xffffffffffffffff f26 = 0x0000555555554768 t`main + 40 at test.c:8:1 f27 = 0xffffffffffffffff f28 = 0xffffffffffffffff f29 = 0xffffffffffffffff f30 = 0xffffffffffffffff f31 = 0xffffffffffffffff 32 registers were unavailable. ``` With this patch: ``` The previous operations are the same. (lldb) register read -a General Purpose Registers: r1 = 0x0000555555554768 t`main + 40 at test.c:8:1 r3 = 0x00007ffffffef780 r22 = 0x00007ffffffef7b0 r23 = 0x00007ffffffef918 r24 = 0x0000000000000001 r25 = 0x0000000000000000 r26 = 0x000055555555be08 t`__do_global_dtors_aux_fini_array_entry r27 = 0x0000555555554740 t`main at test.c:6 r28 = 0x00007ffffffef928 r29 = 0x00007ffff7febc88 ld-linux-loongarch-lp64d.so.1`_rtld_global_ro r30 = 0x000055555555be08 t`__do_global_dtors_aux_fini_array_entry pc = 0x0000555555554768 t`main + 40 at test.c:8:1 33 registers were unavailable. Floating Point Registers: f24 = 0xffffffffffffffff f25 = 0xffffffffffffffff f26 = 0x00007ffffffef780 f27 = 0xffffffffffffffff f28 = 0xffffffffffffffff f29 = 0xffffffffffffffff f30 = 0xffffffffffffffff f31 = 0xffffffffffffffff 33 registers were unavailable. ``` Reviewed By: SixWeining Pull Request: llvm#120391

This will be sent by Arm's Guarded Control Stack extension when an invalid return is executed. The signal does have an address we could show, but it's the PC at which the fault occured. The debugger has plenty of ways to show you that already, so I've left it out. ``` (lldb) c Process 460 resuming Process 460 stopped * thread #1, name = 'test', stop reason = signal SIGSEGV: control protection fault frame #0: 0x0000000000400784 test`main at main.c:57:1 54 afunc(); 55 printf("return from main\n"); 56 return 0; -> 57 } (lldb) dis <...> -> 0x400784 <+100>: ret ``` The new test case generates the signal by corrupting the link register then attempting to return. This will work whether we manually enable GCS or the C library does it for us. (in the former case you could just return from main and it would fault)

llvm#123877) Reverts llvm#122811 due to buildbot breakage e.g., https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/52/builds/5421/steps/11/logs/stdio ASan output from local re-run: ``` ==2780289==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: use-after-poison on address 0x7e0b87e28d28 at pc 0x55a979a99e7e bp 0x7ffe4b18f0b0 sp 0x7ffe4b18f0a8 READ of size 1 at 0x7e0b87e28d28 thread T0 #0 0x55a979a99e7d in getStorageClass /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Object/COFF.h:344 #1 0x55a979a99e7d in isSectionDefinition /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Object/COFF.h:429:9 #2 0x55a979a99e7d in getSymbols /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/LLDMapFile.cpp:54:42 #3 0x55a979a99e7d in lld::coff::writeLLDMapFile(lld::coff::COFFLinkerContext const&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/LLDMapFile.cpp:103:40 #4 0x55a979a16879 in (anonymous namespace)::Writer::run() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Writer.cpp:810:3 swiftlang#5 0x55a979a00aac in lld::coff::writeResult(lld::coff::COFFLinkerContext&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Writer.cpp:354:15 swiftlang#6 0x55a97985f7ed in lld::coff::LinkerDriver::linkerMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Driver.cpp:2826:3 swiftlang#7 0x55a97984cdd3 in lld::coff::link(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, bool, bool) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Driver.cpp:97:15 swiftlang#8 0x55a9797f9793 in lld::unsafeLldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>, bool) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:163:12 swiftlang#9 0x55a9797fa3b6 in operator() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:188:15 swiftlang#10 0x55a9797fa3b6 in void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<lld::lldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>)::$_0>(long) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:46:12 swiftlang#11 0x55a97966cb93 in operator() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:69:12 swiftlang#12 0x55a97966cb93 in llvm::CrashRecoveryContext::RunSafely(llvm::function_ref<void ()>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/CrashRecoveryContext.cpp:426:3 swiftlang#13 0x55a9797f9dc3 in lld::lldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:187:14 swiftlang#14 0x55a979627512 in lld_main(int, char**, llvm::ToolContext const&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/tools/lld/lld.cpp:103:14 swiftlang#15 0x55a979628731 in main /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm_build_asan/tools/lld/tools/lld/lld-driver.cpp:17:10 swiftlang#16 0x7ffb8b202c89 in __libc_start_call_main csu/../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58:16 swiftlang#17 0x7ffb8b202d44 in __libc_start_main csu/../csu/libc-start.c:360:3 swiftlang#18 0x55a97953ef60 in _start (/usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm_build_asan/bin/lld+0x8fd1f60) ```

We can't guaranty that underlying string is 0-terminated and [String.size()] is even in the same allocation. https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/94/builds/4152/steps/17/logs/stdio ``` ==c-index-test==1846256==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 in clang::cxstring::createRef(llvm::StringRef) llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CXString.cpp:96:36 #1 in DumpCXCommentInternal llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:521:39 #2 in DumpCXCommentInternal llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:674:7 #3 in DumpCXCommentInternal llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:674:7 #4 in DumpCXComment llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:685:3 swiftlang#5 in PrintCursorComments llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:768:7 Memory was marked as uninitialized #0 in __msan_allocated_memory llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_interceptors.cpp:1023:5 #1 in Allocate llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Allocator.h:172:7 #2 in Allocate llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Allocator.h:216:12 #3 in Allocate llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/AllocatorBase.h:53:43 #4 in Allocate<char> llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/AllocatorBase.h:76:29 swiftlang#5 in convertCodePointToUTF8 llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentLexer.cpp:42:30 swiftlang#6 in clang::comments::Lexer::resolveHTMLDecimalCharacterReference(llvm::StringRef) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentLexer.cpp:76:10 swiftlang#7 in clang::comments::Lexer::lexHTMLCharacterReference(clang::comments::Token&) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentLexer.cpp:615:16 swiftlang#8 in consumeToken llvm-project/clang/include/clang/AST/CommentParser.h:62:9 swiftlang#9 in clang::comments::Parser::parseParagraphOrBlockCommand() llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentParser.cpp swiftlang#10 in clang::comments::Parser::parseFullComment() llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentParser.cpp:925:22 swiftlang#11 in clang::RawComment::parse(clang::ASTContext const&, clang::Preprocessor const*, clang::Decl const*) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/RawCommentList.cpp:221:12 swiftlang#12 in clang::ASTContext::getCommentForDecl(clang::Decl const*, clang::Preprocessor const*) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp:714:35 swiftlang#13 in clang_Cursor_getParsedComment llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CXComment.cpp:36:35 swiftlang#14 in PrintCursorComments llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:756:25 ```

Reverts llvm#125020 https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/24/builds/5252/steps/12/logs/stdio ``` ==c-index-test==2512295==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0xe19338c27992 at pc 0xc66be4784830 bp 0xe0e33660df00 sp 0xe0e33660d6e8 READ of size 23 at 0xe19338c27992 thread T1 #0 0xc66be478482c in printf_common(void*, char const*, std::__va_list) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors_format.inc:563:9 #1 0xc66be478643c in vprintf /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:1699:1 #2 0xc66be478643c in printf /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:1757:1 #3 0xc66be4839384 in FilteredPrintingVisitor /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:1359:5 #4 0xe4e3454f12e8 in clang::cxcursor::CursorVisitor::Visit(CXCursor, bool) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CIndex.cpp:227:11 swiftlang#5 0xe4e3454f48a8 in bool clang::cxcursor::CursorVisitor::visitPreprocessedEntities<clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator>(clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator, clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator, clang::PreprocessingRecord&, clang::FileID) CIndex.cpp 0xe19338c27992 is located 82 bytes inside of 105-byte region [0xe19338c27940,0xe19338c279a9) freed by thread T1 here: #0 0xc66be480040c in free /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:51:3 #1 0xc66be4839728 in GetCursorSource c-index-test.c #2 0xc66be4839368 in FilteredPrintingVisitor /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:1360:12 #3 0xe4e3454f12e8 in clang::cxcursor::CursorVisitor::Visit(CXCursor, bool) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CIndex.cpp:227:11 #4 0xe4e3454f48a8 in bool clang::cxcursor::CursorVisitor::visitPreprocessedEntities<clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator>(clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator, clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator, clang::PreprocessingRecord&, clang::FileID) CIndex.cpp previously allocated by thread T1 here: #0 0xc66be4800680 in malloc /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:67:3 #1 0xe4e3456379b0 in safe_malloc /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/MemAlloc.h:26:18 #2 0xe4e3456379b0 in createDup /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CXString.cpp:95:40 #3 0xe4e3456379b0 in clang::cxstring::createRef(llvm::StringRef) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CXString.cpp:90:10 ```

…127087) Fixes the following crash in clang-repl ```c++ clang-repl> try { throw 1; } catch { 0; } In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1: input_line_1:1:23: error: expected '(' 1 | try { throw 1; } catch { 0; } | ^ | ( clang-repl: /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/AST/DeclBase.cpp:1757: void clang::DeclContext::addHiddenDecl(clang::Decl*): Assertion `D->getLexicalDeclContext() == this && "Decl inserted into wrong lexical context"' failed. #0 0x000059b28459e6da llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:804:22 #1 0x000059b28459eaed PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:880:1 #2 0x000059b28459bf7f llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:105:20 #3 0x000059b28459df8e SignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:418:13 #4 0x000077cdf444ea50 (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x42a50) swiftlang#5 0x000077cdf44aee3b pthread_kill (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0xa2e3b) swiftlang#6 0x000077cdf444e928 raise (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x42928) swiftlang#7 0x000077cdf443156c abort (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x2556c) swiftlang#8 0x000077cdf44314d2 __assert_perror_fail (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x254d2) swiftlang#9 0x000077cdf4444c56 (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x38c56) swiftlang#10 0x000059b28495bfc4 clang::DeclContext::addHiddenDecl(clang::Decl*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/AST/DeclBase.cpp:1759:3 swiftlang#11 0x000059b28495c0f5 clang::DeclContext::addDecl(clang::Decl*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/AST/DeclBase.cpp:1785:37 swiftlang#12 0x000059b28773cc2a clang::Sema::ActOnStartTopLevelStmtDecl(clang::Scope*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:20302:18 swiftlang#13 0x000059b286f1efdf clang::Parser::ParseTopLevelStmtDecl() /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:6024:62 swiftlang#14 0x000059b286ef18ee clang::Parser::ParseExternalDeclaration(clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1065:35 swiftlang#15 0x000059b286ef0702 clang::Parser::ParseTopLevelDecl(clang::OpaquePtr<clang::DeclGroupRef>&, clang::Sema::ModuleImportState&) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:758:36 swiftlang#16 0x000059b28562dff2 clang::IncrementalParser::ParseOrWrapTopLevelDecl() /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Interpreter/IncrementalParser.cpp:66:36 swiftlang#17 0x000059b28562e5b7 clang::IncrementalParser::Parse(llvm::StringRef) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Interpreter/IncrementalParser.cpp:132:8 swiftlang#18 0x000059b28561832b clang::Interpreter::Parse(llvm::StringRef) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp:570:8 swiftlang#19 0x000059b285618cbd clang::Interpreter::ParseAndExecute(llvm::StringRef, clang::Value*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp:649:8 swiftlang#20 0x000059b2836f9343 main /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/tools/clang-repl/ClangRepl.cpp:255:59 swiftlang#21 0x000077cdf443388e (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x2788e) swiftlang#22 0x000077cdf443394a __libc_start_main (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x2794a) swiftlang#23 0x000059b2836f7965 _start (./bin/clang-repl+0x73b8965) fish: Job 1, './bin/clang-repl' terminated by signal SIGABRT (Abort) ``` With this change: ```c++ clang-repl> try { throw 1; } catch { 0; } In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1: input_line_1:1:23: error: expected '(' 1 | try { throw 1; } catch { 0; } | ^ | ( error: Parsing failed. clang-repl> 1; clang-repl> %quit ```

For function declarations (i.e. func op has no entry block), the FunctionOpInterface method `insertArgument` and `eraseArgument` will cause segfault. This PR guards against manipulation of empty entry block by checking whether func op is external. An example can be seen in google/heir#1324 The segfault trace ``` #1 0x0000560f1289d9db PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) /proc/self/cwd/external/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:874:1 #2 0x0000560f1289b116 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /proc/self/cwd/external/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:105:5 #3 0x0000560f1289e145 SignalHandler(int) /proc/self/cwd/external/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:415:1 #4 0x00007f829a3d9520 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x42520) swiftlang#5 0x0000560f1257f8bc void __gnu_cxx::new_allocator<mlir::BlockArgument>::construct<mlir::BlockArgument, mlir::BlockArgument>(mlir::BlockArgument*, mlir::BlockArgument&&) /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/ext/new_allocator.h:162:23 swiftlang#6 0x0000560f1257f84d void std::allocator_traits<std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> >::construct<mlir::BlockArgument, mlir::BlockArgument>(std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument>&, mlir::BlockArgument*, mlir::BlockArgument&&) /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/alloc_traits.h:520:2 swiftlang#7 0x0000560f12580498 void std::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> >::_M_insert_aux<mlir::BlockArgument>(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<mlir::BlockArgument*, std::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> > >, mlir::BlockArgument&&) /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/vector.tcc:405:7 swiftlang#8 0x0000560f1257cf7e std::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> >::insert(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<mlir::BlockArgument const*, std::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> > >, mlir::BlockArgument const&) /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/vector.tcc:154:6 swiftlang#9 0x0000560f1257b349 mlir::Block::insertArgument(unsigned int, mlir::Type, mlir::Location) /proc/self/cwd/external/llvm-project/mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:178:13 swiftlang#10 0x0000560f123d2a1c mlir::function_interface_impl::insertFunctionArguments(mlir::FunctionOpInterface, llvm::ArrayRef<unsigned int>, mlir::TypeRange, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::DictionaryAttr>, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Location>, unsigned int, mlir::Type) /proc/self/cwd/external/llvm-project/mlir/lib/Interfaces/FunctionInterfaces.cpp:232:11 swiftlang#11 0x0000560f0be6b727 mlir::detail::FunctionOpInterfaceTrait<mlir::func::FuncOp>::insertArguments(llvm::ArrayRef<unsigned int>, mlir::TypeRange, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::DictionaryAttr>, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Location>) /proc/self/cwd/bazel-out/k8-dbg/bin/external/llvm-project/mlir/include/mlir/Interfaces/FunctionInterfaces.h.inc:809:7 swiftlang#12 0x0000560f0be6b536 mlir::detail::FunctionOpInterfaceTrait<mlir::func::FuncOp>::insertArgument(unsigned int, mlir::Type, mlir::DictionaryAttr, mlir::Location) /proc/self/cwd/bazel-out/k8-dbg/bin/external/llvm-project/mlir/include/mlir/Interfaces/FunctionInterfaces.h.inc:796:7 ```

When compiling VLS SVE, the compiler often replaces VL-based offsets with immediate-based ones. This leads to a mismatch in the allowed addressing modes due to SVE loads/stores generally expecting immediate offsets relative to VL. For example, given: ```c svfloat64_t foo(const double *x) { svbool_t pg = svptrue_b64(); return svld1_f64(pg, x+svcntd()); } ``` When compiled with `-msve-vector-bits=128`, we currently generate: ```gas foo: ptrue p0.d mov x8, #2 ld1d { z0.d }, p0/z, [x0, x8, lsl #3] ret ``` Instead, we could be generating: ```gas foo: ldr z0, [x0, #1, mul vl] ret ``` Likewise for other types, stores, and other VLS lengths. This patch achieves the above by extending `SelectAddrModeIndexedSVE` to let constants through when `vscale` is known.

`TestReportData.py` is failing on the macOS CI with: ``` Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py", line 1784, in test_method return attrvalue(self) File "/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/decorators.py", line 148, in wrapper return func(*args, **kwargs) File "/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/asan/TestReportData.py", line 28, in test_libsanitizers_asan self.asan_tests(libsanitizers=True) File "/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/asan/TestReportData.py", line 60, in asan_tests self.expect( File "/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py", line 2490, in expect self.fail(log_msg) AssertionError: Ran command: "thread list" Got output: Process 3474 stopped * thread #1: tid = 0x38b5e9, 0x00007ff80f563b52 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__pthread_kill + 10, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = signal SIGABRT Expecting sub string: "stopped" (was found) Expecting sub string: "stop reason = Use of deallocated memory" (was not found) Process should be stopped due to ASan report ``` There isn't much to go off of in the log, so adding more to help us debug this.

These are macOS tests only and are currently failing on the x86_64 CI and on arm64 on recent versions of macOS/Xcode. The tests are failing because we're stopping in: ``` Process 17458 stopped * thread #1: tid = 0xbda69a, 0x00000002735bd000 libsystem_malloc.dylib`purgeable_print_self.cold.1, stop reason = EXC_BREAKPOINT (code=1, subcode=0x2735bd000) ``` instead of the libsanitizers library. This seems to be related to `-fsanitize-trivial-abi` support Skip these for now until we figure out the root cause.

…lvm#152156) With this new A320 in-order core, we follow adding the FeatureUseFixedOverScalableIfEqualCost feature to A510 and A520 (llvm#132246), which reaps the same code generation benefits of preferring fixed over scalable when the cost is equal. So when we have: ``` void foo(float* a, float* b, float* dst, unsigned n) { for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i) dst[i] = a[i] + b[i]; } ``` When compiling without the feature enabled, we get: ``` ... ld1b { z0.b }, p0/z, [x0, x10] ld1b { z2.b }, p0/z, [x1, x10] add x12, x0, x10 ldr z1, [x12, #1, mul vl] add x12, x1, x10 ldr z3, [x12, #1, mul vl] fadd z0.s, z2.s, z0.s add x12, x2, x10 fadd z1.s, z3.s, z1.s dech x11 st1b { z0.b }, p0, [x2, x10] incb x10, all, mul #2 str z1, [x12, #1, mul vl] ... ``` When compiling with, we get: ``` ... ldp q0, q1, [x12, #-16] ldp q2, q3, [x11, #-16] subs x13, x13, swiftlang#8 fadd v0.4s, v2.4s, v0.4s fadd v1.4s, v3.4s, v1.4s add x11, x11, swiftlang#32 add x12, x12, swiftlang#32 stp q0, q1, [x10, #-16] add x10, x10, swiftlang#32 ... ```

M68k's SETCC instruction (`scc`) distinctly fills the destination byte with all 1s. If boolean contents are set to `ZeroOrOneBooleanContent`, LLVM can mistakenly think the destination holds `0x01` instead of `0xff` and emit broken code as a result. This change corrects the boolean content type to `ZeroOrNegativeOneBooleanContent`. For example, this IR: ```llvm define dso_local signext range(i8 0, 2) i8 @testBool(i32 noundef %a) local_unnamed_addr #0 { entry: %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, 4660 %. = zext i1 %cmp to i8 ret i8 %. } ``` would previously build as: ```asm testBool: ; @testBool cmpi.l swiftlang#4660, (4,%sp) seq %d0 and.l swiftlang#255, %d0 rts ``` Notice the `zext` is erroneously not clearing the low bits, and thus the register returns with 255 instead of 1. This patch fixes the issue: ```asm testBool: ; @testBool cmpi.l swiftlang#4660, (4,%sp) seq %d0 and.l #1, %d0 rts ``` Most of the tests containing `scc` suffered from the same value error as described above, so those tests have been updated to match the new output (which also logically corrects them).

## Problem When the new setting ``` set target.parallel-module-load true ``` was added, lldb began fetching modules from the devices from multiple threads simultaneously. This caused crashes of lldb when debugging on android devices. The top of the stack in the crash look something like this: ``` #0 0x0000555aaf2b27fe llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/opt/llvm/bin/lldb-dap+0xb87fe) #1 0x0000555aaf2b0a99 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/opt/llvm/bin/lldb-dap+0xb6a99) #2 0x0000555aaf2b2fda SignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) (/opt/llvm/bin/lldb-dap+0xb8fda) #3 0x00007f9c02444560 __restore_rt /home/engshare/third-party2/glibc/2.34/src/glibc-2.34/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/libc_sigaction.c:13:0 #4 0x00007f9c04ea7707 lldb_private::ConnectionFileDescriptor::Disconnect(lldb_private::Status*) (usr/bin/../lib/liblldb.so.15+0x22a7707) swiftlang#5 0x00007f9c04ea5b41 lldb_private::ConnectionFileDescriptor::~ConnectionFileDescriptor() (usr/bin/../lib/liblldb.so.15+0x22a5b41) swiftlang#6 0x00007f9c04ea5c1e lldb_private::ConnectionFileDescriptor::~ConnectionFileDescriptor() (usr/bin/../lib/liblldb.so.15+0x22a5c1e) swiftlang#7 0x00007f9c052916ff lldb_private::platform_android::AdbClient::SyncService::Stat(lldb_private::FileSpec const&, unsigned int&, unsigned int&, unsigned int&) (usr/bin/../lib/liblldb.so.15+0x26916ff) swiftlang#8 0x00007f9c0528b9dc lldb_private::platform_android::PlatformAndroid::GetFile(lldb_private::FileSpec const&, lldb_private::FileSpec const&) (usr/bin/../lib/liblldb.so.15+0x268b9dc) ``` Our workaround was to set `set target.parallel-module-load ` to `false` to avoid the crash. ## Background PlatformAndroid creates two different classes with one stateful adb connection shared between the two -- one through AdbClient and another through AdbClient::SyncService. The connection management and state is complex, and seems to be responsible for the segfault we are seeing. The AdbClient code resets these connections at times, and re-establishes connections if they are not active. Similarly, PlatformAndroid caches its SyncService, which uses an AdbClient class, but the SyncService puts its connection into a different 'sync' state that is incompatible with a standard connection. ## Changes in this diff * This diff refactors the code to (hopefully) have clearer ownership of the connection, clearer separation of AdbClient and SyncService by making a new class for clearer separations of concerns, called AdbSyncService. * New unit tests are added * Additional logs were added (see llvm#145382 (comment) for details)

…namic (llvm#153420) Canonicalizing the following IR: ``` func.func @mul_zero_dynamic_nofold(%arg0: tensor<?x17xf32>) -> tensor<?x17xf32> { %0 = "tosa.const"() <{values = dense<0.000000e+00> : tensor<1x1xf32>}> : () -> tensor<1x1xf32> %1 = "tosa.const"() <{values = dense<0> : tensor<1xi8>}> : () -> tensor<1xi8> %2 = tosa.mul %arg0, %0, %1 : (tensor<?x17xf32>, tensor<1x1xf32>, tensor<1xi8>) -> tensor<?x17xf32> return %2 : tensor<?x17xf32> } ``` resulted in a crash ``` #0 0x000056513187e8db backtrace (./build-release/bin/mlir-opt+0x9d698db) #1 0x0000565131b17737 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /local-ssd/sayans/Softwares/llvm-repo/llvm-project-latest/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:838:8 #2 0x0000565131b187f3 PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) /local-ssd/sayans/Softwares/llvm-repo/llvm-project-latest/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:918:1 #3 0x0000565131b18c30 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /local-ssd/sayans/Softwares/llvm-repo/llvm-project-latest/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:105:18 #4 0x0000565131b18c30 SignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) /local-ssd/sayans/Softwares/llvm-repo/llvm-project-latest/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:409:3 swiftlang#5 0x00007f2e4165b050 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x3c050) swiftlang#6 0x00007f2e416a9eec __pthread_kill_implementation ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44:76 swiftlang#7 0x00007f2e4165afb2 raise ./signal/../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:27:6 swiftlang#8 0x00007f2e41645472 abort ./stdlib/abort.c:81:7 swiftlang#9 0x00007f2e41645395 _nl_load_domain ./intl/loadmsgcat.c:1177:9 swiftlang#10 0x00007f2e41653ec2 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x34ec2) swiftlang#11 0x00005651443ec4ba mlir::DenseIntOrFPElementsAttr::getRaw(mlir::ShapedType, llvm::ArrayRef<char>) /local-ssd/sayans/Softwares/llvm-repo/llvm-project-latest/mlir/lib/IR/BuiltinAttributes.cpp:1361:3 swiftlang#12 0x00005651443f1209 mlir::DenseElementsAttr::resizeSplat(mlir::ShapedType) /local-ssd/sayans/Softwares/llvm-repo/llvm-project-latest/mlir/lib/IR/BuiltinAttributes.cpp:0:10 swiftlang#13 0x000056513f76f2b6 mlir::tosa::MulOp::fold(mlir::tosa::MulOpGenericAdaptor<llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Attribute>>) /local-ssd/sayans/Softwares/llvm-repo/llvm-project-latest/mlir/lib/Dialect/Tosa/IR/TosaCanonicalizations.cpp:0:0 ``` from the folder for `tosa::mul` since the zero value was being reshaped to `?x17` size which isn't supported. AFAIK, `tosa.const` requires all dimensions to be static. So in this case, the fix is to not to fold the op.

…vm#153560) Fixes llvm#153157 The proposed solution has been discussed here (llvm#153157 (comment)) This is what we would be seeing now ``` base) anutosh491@Anutoshs-MacBook-Air bin % ./lldb /Users/anutosh491/work/xeus-cpp/a.out (lldb) target create "/Users/anutosh491/work/xeus-cpp/a.out" Current executable set to '/Users/anutosh491/work/xeus-cpp/a.out' (arm64). (lldb) b main Breakpoint 1: where = a.out`main, address = 0x0000000100003f90 (lldb) r Process 71227 launched: '/Users/anutosh491/work/xeus-cpp/a.out' (arm64) Process 71227 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x0000000100003f90 a.out`main a.out`main: -> 0x100003f90 <+0>: sub sp, sp, #0x10 0x100003f94 <+4>: str wzr, [sp, #0xc] 0x100003f98 <+8>: str w0, [sp, #0x8] 0x100003f9c <+12>: str x1, [sp] (lldb) expression --repl -l c -- 1> 1 + 1 (int) $0 = 2 2> 2 + 2 (int) $1 = 4 ``` ``` base) anutosh491@Anutoshs-MacBook-Air bin % ./lldb /Users/anutosh491/work/xeus-cpp/a.out (lldb) target create "/Users/anutosh491/work/xeus-cpp/a.out" Current executable set to '/Users/anutosh491/work/xeus-cpp/a.out' (arm64). (lldb) b main Breakpoint 1: where = a.out`main, address = 0x0000000100003f90 (lldb) r Process 71355 launched: '/Users/anutosh491/work/xeus-cpp/a.out' (arm64) Process 71355 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x0000000100003f90 a.out`main a.out`main: -> 0x100003f90 <+0>: sub sp, sp, #0x10 0x100003f94 <+4>: str wzr, [sp, #0xc] 0x100003f98 <+8>: str w0, [sp, #0x8] 0x100003f9c <+12>: str x1, [sp] (lldb) expression --repl -l c -- 3 + 3 Warning: trailing input is ignored in --repl mode 1> 1 + 1 (int) $0 = 2 ```

This can happen when JIT code is run, and we can't symbolize those frames, but they should remain numbered in the stack. An example spidermonkey trace: ``` #0 0x564ac90fb80f (/builds/worker/dist/bin/js+0x240e80f) (BuildId: 5d053c76aad4cfbd08259f8832e7ac78bbeeab58) #1 0x564ac9223a64 (/builds/worker/dist/bin/js+0x2536a64) (BuildId: 5d053c76aad4cfbd08259f8832e7ac78bbeeab58) #2 0x564ac922316f (/builds/worker/dist/bin/js+0x253616f) (BuildId: 5d053c76aad4cfbd08259f8832e7ac78bbeeab58) #3 0x564ac9eac032 (/builds/worker/dist/bin/js+0x31bf032) (BuildId: 5d053c76aad4cfbd08259f8832e7ac78bbeeab58) #4 0x0dec477ca22e (<unknown module>) ``` Without this change, the following symbolization is output: ``` #0 0x55a6d72f980f in MOZ_CrashSequence /builds/worker/workspace/obj-build/dist/include/mozilla/Assertions.h:248:3 #1 0x55a6d72f980f in Crash(JSContext*, unsigned int, JS::Value*) /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/js/src/shell/js.cpp:4223:5 #2 0x55a6d7421a64 in CallJSNative(JSContext*, bool (*)(JSContext*, unsigned int, JS::Value*), js::CallReason, JS::CallArgs const&) /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/js/src/vm/Interpreter.cpp:501:13 #3 0x55a6d742116f in js::InternalCallOrConstruct(JSContext*, JS::CallArgs const&, js::MaybeConstruct, js::CallReason) /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/js/src/vm/Interpreter.cpp:597:12 #4 0x55a6d80aa032 in js::jit::DoCallFallback(JSContext*, js::jit::BaselineFrame*, js::jit::ICFallbackStub*, unsigned int, JS::Value*, JS::MutableHandle<JS::Value>) /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/js/src/jit/BaselineIC.cpp:1705:10 #4 0x2c803bd8f22e (<unknown module>) ``` The last frame has a duplicate number. With this change the numbering is correct: ``` #0 0x5620c58ec80f in MOZ_CrashSequence /builds/worker/workspace/obj-build/dist/include/mozilla/Assertions.h:248:3 #1 0x5620c58ec80f in Crash(JSContext*, unsigned int, JS::Value*) /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/js/src/shell/js.cpp:4223:5 #2 0x5620c5a14a64 in CallJSNative(JSContext*, bool (*)(JSContext*, unsigned int, JS::Value*), js::CallReason, JS::CallArgs const&) /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/js/src/vm/Interpreter.cpp:501:13 #3 0x5620c5a1416f in js::InternalCallOrConstruct(JSContext*, JS::CallArgs const&, js::MaybeConstruct, js::CallReason) /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/js/src/vm/Interpreter.cpp:597:12 #4 0x5620c669d032 in js::jit::DoCallFallback(JSContext*, js::jit::BaselineFrame*, js::jit::ICFallbackStub*, unsigned int, JS::Value*, JS::MutableHandle<JS::Value>) /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/js/src/jit/BaselineIC.cpp:1705:10 swiftlang#5 0x349f24c7022e (<unknown module>) ```

…gic (llvm#153086) Given the test case: ```llvm define fastcc i16 @testbtst(i16 %a) nounwind { entry: switch i16 %a, label %no [ i16 11, label %yes i16 10, label %yes i16 9, label %yes i16 4, label %yes i16 3, label %yes i16 2, label %yes ] yes: ret i16 1 no: ret i16 0 } ``` We currently get this result: ```asm testbtst: ; @testbtst ; %bb.0: ; %entry move.l %d0, %d1 and.l llvm#65535, %d1 sub.l swiftlang#11, %d1 bhi .LBB0_3 ; %bb.1: ; %entry and.l llvm#65535, %d0 move.l swiftlang#3612, %d1 btst %d0, %d1 bne .LBB0_3 ; <------- Erroneous condition ; %bb.2: ; %yes moveq #1, %d0 rts .LBB0_3: ; %no moveq #0, %d0 rts ``` The cause of this is a line that explicitly reverses the `btst` condition code. But on M68k, `btst` sets condition codes the same as `and` with a bitmask, meaning `EQ` indicates failure (bit is zero) and not success, so the condition does not need to be reversed. In my testing, I've only been able to get switch statements to lower to `btst`, so I wasn't able to explicitly test other options for lowering. But (if possible to trigger) I believe they have the same logical error. For example, in `LowerAndToBTST()`, a comment specifies that it's lowering a case where the `and` result is compared against zero, which means the corresponding `btst` condition should also not be reversed. This patch simply flips the ternary expression in `getBitTestCondition()` to match the ISD condition code with the same M68k code, instead of the opposite.

llvm#137975) An authenticated pointer can be explicitly checked by the compiler via a sequence of instructions that executes BRK on failure. It is important to recognize such BRK instruction as checking every register (as it is expected to immediately trigger an abnormal program termination) to prevent false positive reports about authentication oracles: autia x2, x3 autia x0, x1 ; neither x0 nor x2 are checked at this point eor x16, x0, x0, lsl #1 tbz x16, swiftlang#62, on_success ; marks x0 as checked ; end of BB: for x2 to be checked here, it must be checked in both ; successor basic blocks on_failure: brk 0xc470 on_success: ; x2 is checked ldr x1, [x2] ; marks x2 as checked

…build breakage from llvm#155943) (llvm#156103) ASan now detects dereferences of zero-sized allocations (llvm#155943; the corresponding MSan change is llvm#155944). This appears to have detected a bug in CrossOverTest.cpp, causing a buildbot breakage. This patch fixes the test. Buildbot report: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/4/builds/8732 ``` 7: ==949882==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0xf169cfbe0010 at pc 0xb5f45efc6d1c bp 0xffffd933e460 sp 0xffffd933e458 check:20'0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 8: READ of size 1 at 0xf169cfbe0010 thread T0 check:20'0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 9: #0 0xb5f45efc6d18 in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/llvm/compiler-rt/test/fuzzer/CrossOverTest.cpp:48:7 check:20'0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ check:20'1 ? possible intended match 10: #1 0xb5f45eec7288 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::ExecuteCallback(unsigned char const*, unsigned long) /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/fuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp:619:13 check:20'0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 11: #2 0xb5f45eec85d4 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::ReadAndExecuteSeedCorpora(std::vector<fuzzer::SizedFile, std::allocator<fuzzer::SizedFile>>&) /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/fuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp:812:3 check:20'0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 12: #3 0xb5f45eec8c60 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::Loop(std::vector<fuzzer::SizedFile, std::allocator<fuzzer::SizedFile>>&) /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/fuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp:872:3 check:20'0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 13: #4 0xb5f45eeb5c64 in fuzzer::FuzzerDriver(int*, char***, int (*)(unsigned char const*, unsigned long)) /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/fuzzer/FuzzerDriver.cpp:923:6 check:20'0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 14: swiftlang#5 0xb5f45eee09d0 in main /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/fuzzer/FuzzerMain.cpp:20:10 check:20'0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ``` For context, FuzzerLoop.cpp:812 tries empty input: ``` 810 // Test the callback with empty input and never try it again. 811 uint8_t dummy = 0; 812 ExecuteCallback(&dummy, 0); ```

Reverts llvm#154949 due to suspected buildbot breakage (https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/55/builds/16630/steps/11/logs/stdio). Previously commented on the original pull request: llvm#154949 (comment) ``` ******************** TEST 'MLIR :: Dialect/XeGPU/subgroup-distribute.mlir' FAILED ******************** ... # | PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. # | Stack dump: # | 0. Program arguments: /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm_build_hwasan/bin/mlir-opt -xegpu-subgroup-distribute -allow-unregistered-dialect -canonicalize -cse -split-input-file /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/mlir/test/Dialect/XeGPU/subgroup-distribute.mlir # | #0 0x0000c0af4b066df0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:834:13 # | #1 0x0000c0af4b060e20 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:105:18 # | #2 0x0000c0af4b0691b4 SignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:426:38 # | #3 0x0000ee25a3dcb8f8 (linux-vdso.so.1+0x8f8) # | #4 0x0000ee25a36c7608 (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x87608) # | swiftlang#5 0x0000ee25a367cb3c raise (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x3cb3c) # | swiftlang#6 0x0000ee25a3667e00 abort (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x27e00) # | swiftlang#7 0x0000c0af4ae7e4b0 __sanitizer::Atexit(void (*)()) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_posix_libcdep.cpp:168:10 # | swiftlang#8 0x0000c0af4ae7c354 __sanitizer::Die() /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_termination.cpp:52:5 # | swiftlang#9 0x0000c0af4ae66a30 Unlock /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/hwasan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:250:16 # | swiftlang#10 0x0000c0af4ae66a30 ~GenericScopedLock /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/hwasan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:386:51 # | swiftlang#11 0x0000c0af4ae66a30 __hwasan::ScopedReport::~ScopedReport() /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/hwasan/hwasan_report.cpp:54:5 # | swiftlang#12 0x0000c0af4ae661b8 __hwasan::(anonymous namespace)::BaseReport::~BaseReport() /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/hwasan/hwasan_report.cpp:477:7 # | swiftlang#13 0x0000c0af4ae63f5c __hwasan::ReportTagMismatch(__sanitizer::StackTrace*, unsigned long, unsigned long, bool, bool, unsigned long*) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/hwasan/hwasan_report.cpp:1094:1 # | swiftlang#14 0x0000c0af4ae4f8e0 Destroy /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/hwasan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common.h:532:31 # | swiftlang#15 0x0000c0af4ae4f8e0 ~InternalMmapVector /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/hwasan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common.h:642:56 # | swiftlang#16 0x0000c0af4ae4f8e0 __hwasan::HandleTagMismatch(__hwasan::AccessInfo, unsigned long, unsigned long, void*, unsigned long*) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/hwasan/hwasan.cpp:245:1 # | swiftlang#17 0x0000c0af4ae51e8c __hwasan_tag_mismatch4 /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/hwasan/hwasan.cpp:764:1 # | swiftlang#18 0x0000c0af4ae67b30 __interception::InterceptFunction(char const*, unsigned long*, unsigned long, unsigned long) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_linux.cpp:60:0 # | swiftlang#19 0x0000c0af5641cd24 getNumResults /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/mlir/include/mlir/IR/Operation.h:404:37 # | swiftlang#20 0x0000c0af5641cd24 getOpResultImpl /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/mlir/include/mlir/IR/Operation.h:1010:5 # | swiftlang#21 0x0000c0af5641cd24 getResult /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/mlir/include/mlir/IR/Operation.h:407:54 # | swiftlang#22 0x0000c0af5641cd24 mlir::OpTrait::detail::MultiResultTraitBase<mlir::gpu::WarpExecuteOnLane0Op, mlir::OpTrait::VariadicResults>::getResult(unsigned int) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/mlir/include/mlir/IR/OpDefinition.h:638:62 # | swiftlang#23 0x0000c0af56426b60 getType /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/mlir/include/mlir/IR/Value.h:63:33 # | swiftlang#24 0x0000c0af56426b60 getType /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/mlir/include/mlir/IR/Value.h:105:39 # | swiftlang#25 0x0000c0af56426b60 (anonymous namespace)::LoadDistribution::matchAndRewrite(mlir::gpu::WarpExecuteOnLane0Op, mlir::PatternRewriter&) const /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/mlir/lib/Dialect/XeGPU/Transforms/XeGPUSubgroupDistribute.cpp:991:55 ... ```

Some downstream work broke these tests because the attribute number changed. Refactor these tests to be more resilient in the face of changes like this * `instrument-objc-method.m` * `#1` was never checked, I think it was trying to check that `__cyg_profile_func_enter` was not used, so I added `--implicit-check-not="__cyg_profile_func_enter"` * Use `[[#ATTR:]]` so the test doesn't fail if the number changes * `address-safety-attr.mm` * Check attributes in `Function Attrs:` so it's independent of the attribute number

A recent change adding a new sanitizer kind (via Sanitizers.def) was reverted in c74fa20 ("Revert "[Clang][CodeGen] Introduce the AllocToken SanitizerKind" (llvm#162413)"). The reason was this ASan report, when running the test cases in clang/test/Preprocessor/print-header-json.c: ``` ==clang==483265==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x7d82b97e8b58 at pc 0x562cd432231f bp 0x7fff3fad0850 sp 0x7fff3fad0848 READ of size 16 at 0x7d82b97e8b58 thread T0 #0 0x562cd432231e in __copy_non_overlapping_range<const unsigned long *, const unsigned long *> zorg-test/libcxx_install_asan_ubsan/include/c++/v1/string:2144:38 #1 0x562cd432231e in void std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>::__init_with_size[abi:nn220000]<unsigned long const*, unsigned long const*>(unsigned long const*, unsigned long const*, unsigned long) zorg-test/libcxx_install_asan_ubsan/include/c++/v1/string:2685:18 #2 0x562cd41e2797 in __init<const unsigned long *, 0> zorg-test/libcxx_install_asan_ubsan/include/c++/v1/string:2673:3 #3 0x562cd41e2797 in basic_string<const unsigned long *, 0> zorg-test/libcxx_install_asan_ubsan/include/c++/v1/string:1174:5 #4 0x562cd41e2797 in clang::ASTReader::ReadString(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<unsigned long> const&, unsigned int&) clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:10171:15 swiftlang#5 0x562cd41fd89a in clang::ASTReader::ParseLanguageOptions(llvm::SmallVector<unsigned long, 64u> const&, llvm::StringRef, bool, clang::ASTReaderListener&, bool) clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:6475:28 swiftlang#6 0x562cd41eea53 in clang::ASTReader::ReadOptionsBlock(llvm::BitstreamCursor&, llvm::StringRef, unsigned int, bool, clang::ASTReaderListener&, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&) clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:3069:11 swiftlang#7 0x562cd4204ab8 in clang::ASTReader::ReadControlBlock(clang::serialization::ModuleFile&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<clang::ASTReader::ImportedModule>&, clang::serialization::ModuleFile const*, unsigned int) clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:3249:15 swiftlang#8 0x562cd42097d2 in clang::ASTReader::ReadASTCore(llvm::StringRef, clang::serialization::ModuleKind, clang::SourceLocation, clang::serialization::ModuleFile*, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<clang::ASTReader::ImportedModule>&, long, long, clang::ASTFileSignature, unsigned int) clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:5182:15 swiftlang#9 0x562cd421ec77 in clang::ASTReader::ReadAST(llvm::StringRef, clang::serialization::ModuleKind, clang::SourceLocation, unsigned int, clang::serialization::ModuleFile**) clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:4828:11 swiftlang#10 0x562cd3d07b74 in clang::CompilerInstance::findOrCompileModuleAndReadAST(llvm::StringRef, clang::SourceLocation, clang::SourceLocation, bool) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:1805:27 swiftlang#11 0x562cd3d0b2ef in clang::CompilerInstance::loadModule(clang::SourceLocation, llvm::ArrayRef<clang::IdentifierLoc>, clang::Module::NameVisibilityKind, bool) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:1956:31 swiftlang#12 0x562cdb04eb1c in clang::Preprocessor::HandleHeaderIncludeOrImport(clang::SourceLocation, clang::Token&, clang::Token&, clang::SourceLocation, clang::detail::SearchDirIteratorImpl<true>, clang::FileEntry const*) clang/lib/Lex/PPDirectives.cpp:2423:49 swiftlang#13 0x562cdb042222 in clang::Preprocessor::HandleIncludeDirective(clang::SourceLocation, clang::Token&, clang::detail::SearchDirIteratorImpl<true>, clang::FileEntry const*) clang/lib/Lex/PPDirectives.cpp:2101:17 swiftlang#14 0x562cdb043366 in clang::Preprocessor::HandleDirective(clang::Token&) clang/lib/Lex/PPDirectives.cpp:1338:14 swiftlang#15 0x562cdafa84bc in clang::Lexer::LexTokenInternal(clang::Token&, bool) clang/lib/Lex/Lexer.cpp:4512:7 swiftlang#16 0x562cdaf9f20b in clang::Lexer::Lex(clang::Token&) clang/lib/Lex/Lexer.cpp:3729:24 swiftlang#17 0x562cdb0d4ffa in clang::Preprocessor::Lex(clang::Token&) clang/lib/Lex/Preprocessor.cpp:896:11 swiftlang#18 0x562cd77da950 in clang::ParseAST(clang::Sema&, bool, bool) clang/lib/Parse/ParseAST.cpp:163:7 [...] 0x7d82b97e8b58 is located 0 bytes after 3288-byte region [0x7d82b97e7e80,0x7d82b97e8b58) allocated by thread T0 here: #0 0x562cca76f604 in malloc zorg-test/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:67:3 #1 0x562cd1cce452 in safe_malloc llvm/include/llvm/Support/MemAlloc.h:26:18 #2 0x562cd1cce452 in llvm::SmallVectorBase<unsigned int>::grow_pod(void*, unsigned long, unsigned long) llvm/lib/Support/SmallVector.cpp:151:15 #3 0x562cdbe1768b in grow_pod llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:139:11 #4 0x562cdbe1768b in grow llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:525:41 swiftlang#5 0x562cdbe1768b in reserve llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:665:13 swiftlang#6 0x562cdbe1768b in llvm::BitstreamCursor::readRecord(unsigned int, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<unsigned long>&, llvm::StringRef*) llvm/lib/Bitstream/Reader/BitstreamReader.cpp:230:10 swiftlang#7 0x562cd41ee8ab in clang::ASTReader::ReadOptionsBlock(llvm::BitstreamCursor&, llvm::StringRef, unsigned int, bool, clang::ASTReaderListener&, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&) clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:3060:49 swiftlang#8 0x562cd4204ab8 in clang::ASTReader::ReadControlBlock(clang::serialization::ModuleFile&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<clang::ASTReader::ImportedModule>&, clang::serialization::ModuleFile const*, unsigned int) clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:3249:15 swiftlang#9 0x562cd42097d2 in clang::ASTReader::ReadASTCore(llvm::StringRef, clang::serialization::ModuleKind, clang::SourceLocation, clang::serialization::ModuleFile*, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<clang::ASTReader::ImportedModule>&, long, long, clang::ASTFileSignature, unsigned int) clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:5182:15 swiftlang#10 0x562cd421ec77 in clang::ASTReader::ReadAST(llvm::StringRef, clang::serialization::ModuleKind, clang::SourceLocation, unsigned int, clang::serialization::ModuleFile**) clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:4828:11 swiftlang#11 0x562cd3d07b74 in clang::CompilerInstance::findOrCompileModuleAndReadAST(llvm::StringRef, clang::SourceLocation, clang::SourceLocation, bool) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:1805:27 swiftlang#12 0x562cd3d0b2ef in clang::CompilerInstance::loadModule(clang::SourceLocation, llvm::ArrayRef<clang::IdentifierLoc>, clang::Module::NameVisibilityKind, bool) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:1956:31 swiftlang#13 0x562cdb04eb1c in clang::Preprocessor::HandleHeaderIncludeOrImport(clang::SourceLocation, clang::Token&, clang::Token&, clang::SourceLocation, clang::detail::SearchDirIteratorImpl<true>, clang::FileEntry const*) clang/lib/Lex/PPDirectives.cpp:2423:49 swiftlang#14 0x562cdb042222 in clang::Preprocessor::HandleIncludeDirective(clang::SourceLocation, clang::Token&, clang::detail::SearchDirIteratorImpl<true>, clang::FileEntry const*) clang/lib/Lex/PPDirectives.cpp:2101:17 swiftlang#15 0x562cdb043366 in clang::Preprocessor::HandleDirective(clang::Token&) clang/lib/Lex/PPDirectives.cpp:1338:14 swiftlang#16 0x562cdafa84bc in clang::Lexer::LexTokenInternal(clang::Token&, bool) clang/lib/Lex/Lexer.cpp:4512:7 swiftlang#17 0x562cdaf9f20b in clang::Lexer::Lex(clang::Token&) clang/lib/Lex/Lexer.cpp:3729:24 swiftlang#18 0x562cdb0d4ffa in clang::Preprocessor::Lex(clang::Token&) clang/lib/Lex/Preprocessor.cpp:896:11 swiftlang#19 0x562cd77da950 in clang::ParseAST(clang::Sema&, bool, bool) clang/lib/Parse/ParseAST.cpp:163:7 [...] SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:10171:15 in clang::ASTReader::ReadString(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<unsigned long> const&, unsigned int&) ``` The reason is this particular RUN line: ``` // RUN: env CC_PRINT_HEADERS_FORMAT=json CC_PRINT_HEADERS_FILTERING=direct-per-file CC_PRINT_HEADERS_FILE=%t.txt %clang -fsyntax-only -I %S/Inputs/print-header-json -isystem %S/Inputs/print-header-json/system -fmodules -fimplicit-module-maps -fmodules-cache-path=%t %s -o /dev/null ``` which was added in 8df194f ("[Clang] Support includes translated to module imports in -header-include-filtering=direct-per-file (llvm#156756)"). The problem is caused by an incremental build reusing stale cached module files (.pcm) that are no longer binary-compatible with the updated compiler. Adding a new sanitizer option altered the implicit binary layout of the serialized LangOptions data structure. The build + test system is oblivious to such changes. When the new compiler attempted to read the old module file (from the previous test invocation), it misinterpreted the data due to the layout mismatch, resulting in a heap-buffer-overflow. Unfortunately Clang's PCM format does not encode nor detect version mismatches here; a more graceful failure mode would be preferable. For now, fix the test to be more robust with incremental build + test.

Otherwise debug-info is stripped, which influences the language of the current frame. Also, set explicit breakpoint because Windows seems to not obey the debugtrap. Log from failing test on Windows: ``` (lldb) command source -s 0 'lit-lldb-init-quiet' Executing commands in 'D:\test\lit-lldb-init-quiet'. (lldb) command source -C --silent-run true lit-lldb-init (lldb) target create "main.out" Current executable set to 'D:\test\main.out' (x86_64). (lldb) settings set interpreter.stop-command-source-on-error false (lldb) command source -s 0 'with-target.input' Executing commands in 'D:\test\with-target.input'. (lldb) expr blah ^ error: use of undeclared identifier 'blah' note: Falling back to default language. Ran expression as 'Objective C++'. (lldb) run Process 29404 launched: 'D:\test\main.out' (x86_64) Process 29404 stopped * thread #1, stop reason = Exception 0x80000003 encountered at address 0x7ff7b3df7189 frame #0: 0x00007ff7b3df718a main.out -> 0x7ff7b3df718a: xorl %eax, %eax 0x7ff7b3df718c: popq %rcx 0x7ff7b3df718d: retq 0x7ff7b3df718e: int3 (lldb) expr blah ^ error: use of undeclared identifier 'blah' note: Falling back to default language. Ran expression as 'Objective C++'. (lldb) expr -l objc -- blah ^ error: use of undeclared identifier 'blah' note: Expression evaluation in pure Objective-C not supported. Ran expression as 'Objective C++'. (lldb) expr -l c -- blah ^ error: use of undeclared identifier 'blah' note: Expression evaluation in pure C not supported. Ran expression as 'ISO C++'. ```

The Tkinter module was renamed to tkinter in Python 3.0. https://docs.python.org/2/library/tkinter.html https://docs.python.org/3/library/tkinter.html Rest of it appears to work when imported inside of LLDB: ``` $ ./bin/lldb /tmp/test.o (lldb) target create "/tmp/test.o" Current executable set to '/tmp/test.o' (x86_64). (lldb) b main Breakpoint 1: where = test.o`main + 8 at test.c:1:18, address = 0x0000000000001131 (lldb) run Process 121572 launched: '/tmp/test.o' (x86_64) Process 121572 stopped * thread #1, name = 'test.o', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x0000555555555131 test.o`main at test.c:1:18 -> 1 int main() { int a = 1; char b = '?'; return 0; } (lldb) command script import <...>/llvm-project/lldb/examples/python/lldbtk.py (lldb) tk- Available completions: tk-process -- For more information run 'help tk-process' tk-target -- For more information run 'help tk-target' tk-variables -- For more information run 'help tk-variables' (lldb) tk-process (lldb) tk-target (lldb) tk-variables ```

…ypes (llvm#162278) When we take the following C program: ``` int main() { return 0; } ``` and create a statically-linked executable from it: ``` clang -static -g -o main main.c ``` Then we can observe the following `lldb` behavior: ``` $ lldb (lldb) target create main Current executable set to '.../main' (x86_64). (lldb) breakpoint set --name main Breakpoint 1: where = main`main + 11 at main.c:2:3, address = 0x000000000022aa7b (lldb) process launch Process 3773637 launched: '/home/me/tmp/built-in/main' (x86_64) Process 3773637 stopped * thread #1, name = 'main', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x000000000022aa7b main`main at main.c:2:3 1 int main() { -> 2 return 0; 3 } (lldb) script lldb.debugger.GetSelectedTarget().FindFirstType("__int128").size 0 (lldb) script lldb.debugger.GetSelectedTarget().FindFirstType("unsigned __int128").size 0 (lldb) quit ``` The value return by the `SBTarget::FindFirstType` method is wrong for the `__int128` and `unsigned __int128` basic types. The proposed changes make the `TypeSystemClang::GetBasicTypeEnumeration` method consistent with `gcc` and `clang` C [language extension](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fint128.html) related to 128-bit integer types as well as with the `BuiltinType::getName` method in the LLVM codebase itself. When the above change is applied, the behavior of the `lldb` changes in the following (desired) way: ``` $ lldb (lldb) target create main Current executable set to '.../main' (x86_64). (lldb) breakpoint set --name main Breakpoint 1: where = main`main + 11 at main.c:2:3, address = 0x000000000022aa7b (lldb) process launch Process 3773637 launched: '/home/me/tmp/built-in/main' (x86_64) Process 3773637 stopped * thread #1, name = 'main', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x000000000022aa7b main`main at main.c:2:3 1 int main() { -> 2 return 0; 3 } (lldb) script lldb.debugger.GetSelectedTarget().FindFirstType("__int128").size 16 (lldb) script lldb.debugger.GetSelectedTarget().FindFirstType("unsigned __int128").size 16 (lldb) quit ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Matej Košík <[email protected]>

**Mitigation for:** google/sanitizers#749 **Disclosure:** I'm not an ASan compiler expert yet (I'm trying to learn!), I primarily work in the runtime. Some of this PR was developed with the help of AI tools (primarily as a "fuzzy `grep` engine"), but I've manually refined and tested the output, and can speak for every line. In general, I used it only to orient myself and for "rubberducking". **Context:** The msvc ASan team (👋 ) has received an internal request to improve clang's exception handling under ASan for Windows. Namely, we're interested in **mitigating** this bug: google/sanitizers#749 To summarize, today, clang + ASan produces a false-positive error for this program: ```C++ #include <cstdio> #include <exception> int main() { try { throw std::exception("test"); }catch (const std::exception& ex){ puts(ex.what()); } return 0; } ``` The error reads as such: ``` C:\Users\dajusto\source\repros\upstream>type main.cpp #include <cstdio> #include <exception> int main() { try { throw std::exception("test"); }catch (const std::exception& ex){ puts(ex.what()); } return 0; } C:\Users\dajusto\source\repros\upstream>"C:\Users\dajusto\source\repos\llvm-project\build.runtimes\bin\clang.exe" -fsanitize=address -g -O0 main.cpp C:\Users\dajusto\source\repros\upstream>a.exe ================================================================= ==19112==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: access-violation on unknown address 0x000000000000 (pc 0x7ff72c7c11d9 bp 0x0080000ff960 sp 0x0080000fcf50 T0) ==19112==The signal is caused by a READ memory access. ==19112==Hint: address points to the zero page. #0 0x7ff72c7c11d8 in main C:\Users\dajusto\source\repros\upstream\main.cpp:8 #1 0x7ff72c7d479f in _CallSettingFrame C:\repos\msvc\src\vctools\crt\vcruntime\src\eh\amd64\handlers.asm:49 #2 0x7ff72c7c8944 in __FrameHandler3::CxxCallCatchBlock(struct _EXCEPTION_RECORD *) C:\repos\msvc\src\vctools\crt\vcruntime\src\eh\frame.cpp:1567 #3 0x7ffb4a90e3e5 (C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll+0x18012e3e5) #4 0x7ff72c7c1128 in main C:\Users\dajusto\source\repros\upstream\main.cpp:6 swiftlang#5 0x7ff72c7c33db in invoke_main C:\repos\msvc\src\vctools\crt\vcstartup\src\startup\exe_common.inl:78 swiftlang#6 0x7ff72c7c33db in __scrt_common_main_seh C:\repos\msvc\src\vctools\crt\vcstartup\src\startup\exe_common.inl:288 swiftlang#7 0x7ffb49b05c06 (C:\WINDOWS\System32\KERNEL32.DLL+0x180035c06) swiftlang#8 0x7ffb4a8455ef (C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll+0x1800655ef) ==19112==Register values: rax = 0 rbx = 80000ff8e0 rcx = 27d76d00000 rdx = 80000ff8e0 rdi = 80000fdd50 rsi = 80000ff6a0 rbp = 80000ff960 rsp = 80000fcf50 r8 = 100 r9 = 19930520 r10 = 8000503a90 r11 = 80000fd540 r12 = 80000fd020 r13 = 0 r14 = 80000fdeb8 r15 = 0 AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info. SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: access-violation C:\Users\dajusto\source\repros\upstream\main.cpp:8 in main ==19112==ABORTING ``` The root of the issue _appears to be_ that ASan's instrumentation is incompatible with Window's assumptions for instantiating `catch`-block's parameters (`ex` in the snippet above). The nitty gritty details are lost on me, but I understand that to make this work without loss of ASan coverage, a "serious" refactoring is needed. In the meantime, users risk false positive errors when pairing ASan + catch-block parameters on Windows. **To mitigate this** I think we should avoid instrumenting catch-block parameters on Windows. It appears to me this is as "simple" as marking catch block parameters as "uninteresting" in `AddressSanitizer::isInterestingAlloca`. My manual tests seem to confirm this. I believe this is strictly better than today's status quo, where the runtime generates false positives. Although we're now explicitly choosing to instrument less, the benefit is that now more programs can run with ASan without _funky_ macros that disable ASan on exception blocks. **This PR:** implements the mitigation above, and creates a simple new test for it. _Thanks!_ --------- Co-authored-by: Antonio Frighetto <[email protected]>

…nteger registers (llvm#163646) Fix the `RegisterValue::SetValueFromData` method so that it works also for 128-bit registers that contain integers. Without this change, the `RegisterValue::SetValueFromData` method does not work correctly for 128-bit registers that contain (signed or unsigned) integers. --- Steps to reproduce the problem: (1) Create a program that writes a 128-bit number to a 128-bit registers `xmm0`. E.g.: ``` #include <stdint.h> int main() { __asm__ volatile ( "pinsrq $0, %[lo], %%xmm0\n\t" // insert low 64 bits "pinsrq $1, %[hi], %%xmm0" // insert high 64 bits : : [lo]"r"(0x7766554433221100), [hi]"r"(0xffeeddccbbaa9988) ); return 0; } ``` (2) Compile this program with LLVM compiler: ``` $ $YOUR/clang -g -o main main.c ``` (3) Modify LLDB so that when it will be reading value from the `xmm0` register, instead of assuming that it is vector register, it will treat it as if it contain an integer. This can be achieved e.g. this way: ``` diff --git a/lldb/source/Utility/RegisterValue.cpp b/lldb/source/Utility/RegisterValue.cpp index 0e99451..a4b51db3e56d 100644 --- a/lldb/source/Utility/RegisterValue.cpp +++ b/lldb/source/Utility/RegisterValue.cpp @@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ Status RegisterValue::SetValueFromData(const RegisterInfo &reg_info, break; case eEncodingUint: case eEncodingSint: + case eEncodingVector: if (reg_info.byte_size == 1) SetUInt8(src.GetMaxU32(&src_offset, src_len)); else if (reg_info.byte_size <= 2) @@ -217,23 +218,6 @@ Status RegisterValue::SetValueFromData(const RegisterInfo &reg_info, else if (reg_info.byte_size == sizeof(long double)) SetLongDouble(src.GetLongDouble(&src_offset)); break; - case eEncodingVector: { - m_type = eTypeBytes; - assert(reg_info.byte_size <= kMaxRegisterByteSize); - buffer.bytes.resize(reg_info.byte_size); - buffer.byte_order = src.GetByteOrder(); - if (src.CopyByteOrderedData( - src_offset, // offset within "src" to start extracting data - src_len, // src length - buffer.bytes.data(), // dst buffer - buffer.bytes.size(), // dst length - buffer.byte_order) == 0) // dst byte order - { - error = Status::FromErrorStringWithFormat( - "failed to copy data for register write of %s", reg_info.name); - return error; - } - } } if (m_type == eTypeInvalid) ``` (4) Rebuild the LLDB. (5) Observe what happens how LLDB will print the content of this register after it was initialized with 128-bit value. ``` $YOUR/lldb --source ./main (lldb) target create main Current executable set to '.../main' (x86_64). (lldb) breakpoint set --file main.c --line 11 Breakpoint 1: where = main`main + 45 at main.c:11:3, address = 0x000000000000164d (lldb) settings set stop-line-count-before 20 (lldb) process launch Process 2568735 launched: '.../main' (x86_64) Process 2568735 stopped * thread #1, name = 'main', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x000055555555564d main`main at main.c:11:3 1 #include <stdint.h> 2 3 int main() { 4 __asm__ volatile ( 5 "pinsrq $0, %[lo], %%xmm0\n\t" // insert low 64 bits 6 "pinsrq $1, %[hi], %%xmm0" // insert high 64 bits 7 : 8 : [lo]"r"(0x7766554433221100), 9 [hi]"r"(0xffeeddccbbaa9988) 10 ); -> 11 return 0; 12 } (lldb) register read --format hex xmm0 xmm0 = 0x7766554433221100ffeeddccbbaa9988 ``` You can see that the upper and lower 64-bit wide halves are swapped. --------- Co-authored-by: Matej Košík <[email protected]>

…lvm#162993) Early if conversion can create instruction sequences such as ``` mov x1, #1 csel x0, x1, x2, eq ``` which could be simplified into the following instead ``` csinc x0, x2, xzr, ne ``` One notable example that generates code like this is `cmpxchg weak`. This is fixed by handling an immediate value of 1 as `add(wzr, 1)` so that the addition can be folded into CSEL by using CSINC instead.

weliveindetail added 2 commits September 25, 2020 15:28

[ORC] Fix linkage of OrcJITTests target

bce5b0c

LLVMOrcError was removed and OrcError.cpp is now part of LLVMOrcShared

[Examples] Minor adaption for recent ORC-TPC API-change in LLJITWithT…

dbcb79f

…argetProcessControl

lhames merged this pull request into lhames:orcv1-removal-with-remote-tpc Sep 25, 2020

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Minor fixes after recent API changes #1

Minor fixes after recent API changes #1

Uh oh!

weliveindetail commented Sep 25, 2020

Uh oh!

lhames commented Sep 25, 2020

Uh oh!

lhames commented Sep 25, 2020

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Minor fixes after recent API changes #1

Minor fixes after recent API changes #1

Uh oh!

Conversation

weliveindetail commented Sep 25, 2020

Uh oh!

lhames commented Sep 25, 2020

Uh oh!

lhames commented Sep 25, 2020

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants