revert #1464 #1497
Merged
revert #1464 #1497
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
styfle
approved these changes
Jun 12, 2019
joshbruce
approved these changes
Jun 12, 2019
This was referenced Aug 30, 2019
This was referenced Oct 26, 2019
This was referenced Nov 18, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Marked version: master
Markdown flavor: Markdown.pl|CommonMark|GitHub Flavored Markdown|n/a
Description
Revert #1464
Fixes #1494
#1464 fixes recursion limit for fully nested blockquotes
but it doesn't solve recursion for partially nested blockquotes
I'm not sure that we should have a special case for fully nested blockquotes.
Contributor
Committer
In most cases, this should be a different person than the contributor.