-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 23
[EVM] Unfold signextend(c, x) -> ashr(shl(x, 256 - (c + 1) * 8), 256 - (c + 1) * 8) #875
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
0943a29 to
28ecd89
Compare
|
0f7085f to
7796f2f
Compare
|
📊 Excel Report Available Benchmarks measured for:
|
7796f2f to
1e20245
Compare
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #875 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 30.09% 30.11% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 2430 2430
Lines 806613 806688 +75
Branches 176243 176259 +16
==========================================
+ Hits 242781 242902 +121
+ Misses 521685 521622 -63
- Partials 42147 42164 +17 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
0b13d0d to
d86b664
Compare
…- (c + 1) * 8) This transform does unfold to canonical InstCombine form, instead to sext(trunc(x, (c + 1) * 8), 256). Unfold signextend to LLVM instructions, iff c is constant, so LLVM can optimize it better. Do the folding back just before ISel, since we can do cross BB boundaries. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Radosavljevic <[email protected]>
…nd(b, x)), x Signed-off-by: Vladimir Radosavljevic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Radosavljevic <[email protected]>
d86b664 to
045a7f4
Compare
No description provided.